Leonie A Dudda, Magdalena Kozula, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Eva Kormann, René Spijker, Nicholas DeVito, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Veerle Van den Eynden, Patrick Onghena, Florian Naudet, Rita Banzi, Maddalena Fratelli, Monika Varga, Yuri Andrei Gelsleichter, Inge Stegeman, Mariska M Leeflang
{"title":"Scoping review and evidence mapping of interventions aimed at improving reproducible and replicable science: Protocol.","authors":"Leonie A Dudda, Magdalena Kozula, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Eva Kormann, René Spijker, Nicholas DeVito, Gowri Gopalakrishna, Veerle Van den Eynden, Patrick Onghena, Florian Naudet, Rita Banzi, Maddalena Fratelli, Monika Varga, Yuri Andrei Gelsleichter, Inge Stegeman, Mariska M Leeflang","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.16567.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many interventions, especially those linked to open science, have been proposed to improve reproducibility in science. To what extent these propositions are based on scientific evidence from empirical evaluations is not clear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary objective is to identify Open Science interventions that have been formally investigated regarding their influence on reproducibility and replicability. A secondary objective is to list any facilitators or barriers reported and to identify gaps in the evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search broadly by using electronic bibliographic databases, broad internet search, and contacting experts in the field of reproducibility, replicability, and open science. Any study investigating interventions for their influence on the reproducibility and replicability of research will be selected, including those studies additionally investigating drivers and barriers to the implementation and effectiveness of interventions. Studies will first be selected by title and abstract (if available) and then by reading the full text by at least two independent reviewers. We will analyze existing scientific evidence using scoping review and evidence gap mapping methodologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results will be presented in interactive evidence maps, summarized in a narrative synthesis, and serve as input for subsequent research.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>This protocol has been pre-registered on OSF under doi https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/D65YS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"3 ","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16567.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many interventions, especially those linked to open science, have been proposed to improve reproducibility in science. To what extent these propositions are based on scientific evidence from empirical evaluations is not clear.
Aims: The primary objective is to identify Open Science interventions that have been formally investigated regarding their influence on reproducibility and replicability. A secondary objective is to list any facilitators or barriers reported and to identify gaps in the evidence.
Methods: We will search broadly by using electronic bibliographic databases, broad internet search, and contacting experts in the field of reproducibility, replicability, and open science. Any study investigating interventions for their influence on the reproducibility and replicability of research will be selected, including those studies additionally investigating drivers and barriers to the implementation and effectiveness of interventions. Studies will first be selected by title and abstract (if available) and then by reading the full text by at least two independent reviewers. We will analyze existing scientific evidence using scoping review and evidence gap mapping methodologies.
Results: The results will be presented in interactive evidence maps, summarized in a narrative synthesis, and serve as input for subsequent research.
Review registration: This protocol has been pre-registered on OSF under doi https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/D65YS.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
