The Cumulative Incidence of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Protocol.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2023.0117
Joshua Z Goldenberg, Richard Davis Batson, Mary Jo Pugh, Heather Zwickey, Jennifer Beardsley, Maurice P Zeegers, Michael Freeman
{"title":"The Cumulative Incidence of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Protocol.","authors":"Joshua Z Goldenberg, Richard Davis Batson, Mary Jo Pugh, Heather Zwickey, Jennifer Beardsley, Maurice P Zeegers, Michael Freeman","doi":"10.1089/neur.2023.0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A precise understanding of the latency to post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is necessary for optimal patient care. This precision is currently lacking despite a surprising number of available data sources that could address this pressing need. Following guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration and Joanna Briggs Institute, we conduct a systematic review to address the research questions: What is the cumulative incidence of PTE following mild TBI (mTBI; concussion), and what is the distribution of the latency to onset? We designed a comprehensive search of medical databases and gray literature sources. Citations will be screened on both abstract and full-text levels, independently and in duplicate. Studies will be evaluated for risk of bias independently and in duplicate using published instruments specific to incidence/prevalence studies. Data will be abstracted independently and in duplicate using piloted extraction forms. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or third-party adjudication. Evidence synthesis will involve pairwise and individual participant data meta-analysis with heterogeneity explored via a set of predetermined subgroups. The robustness of the findings will be subjected to sensitivity analyses based on the risk of bias, outlier studies, and mTBI definitional criteria. The overall certainty in the estimates will be reported using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations). This protocol presents an innovative and impactful approach to build on the growing body of knowledge surrounding post-mTBI PTE. Through a precise understanding of the latency period, this study can contribute to early detection, tailored interventions, and improved outcomes, leading to a substantial impact on patient care and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"522-528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A precise understanding of the latency to post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is necessary for optimal patient care. This precision is currently lacking despite a surprising number of available data sources that could address this pressing need. Following guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration and Joanna Briggs Institute, we conduct a systematic review to address the research questions: What is the cumulative incidence of PTE following mild TBI (mTBI; concussion), and what is the distribution of the latency to onset? We designed a comprehensive search of medical databases and gray literature sources. Citations will be screened on both abstract and full-text levels, independently and in duplicate. Studies will be evaluated for risk of bias independently and in duplicate using published instruments specific to incidence/prevalence studies. Data will be abstracted independently and in duplicate using piloted extraction forms. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus or third-party adjudication. Evidence synthesis will involve pairwise and individual participant data meta-analysis with heterogeneity explored via a set of predetermined subgroups. The robustness of the findings will be subjected to sensitivity analyses based on the risk of bias, outlier studies, and mTBI definitional criteria. The overall certainty in the estimates will be reported using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations). This protocol presents an innovative and impactful approach to build on the growing body of knowledge surrounding post-mTBI PTE. Through a precise understanding of the latency period, this study can contribute to early detection, tailored interventions, and improved outcomes, leading to a substantial impact on patient care and quality of life.

轻度脑外伤后创伤后癫痫的累积发病率:系统综述与个体参与者数据元分析协议》。
准确了解创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 后发生创伤后癫痫 (PTE) 的潜伏期对于优化患者护理非常必要。尽管有数量惊人的可用数据源可以满足这一迫切需求,但目前还缺乏这种精确性。根据 Cochrane 协作组织和乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的指导,我们开展了一项系统性综述,以解决以下研究问题:轻度 TBI(mTBI;脑震荡)后 PTE 的累积发病率是多少?我们对医学数据库和灰色文献资料进行了全面检索。我们将在摘要和全文两个层面对引文进行独立、重复的筛选。将使用已发布的发病率/流行率研究专用工具对研究进行独立评估,评估结果一式两份。将使用试行的数据提取表对数据进行一式两份的独立摘要。出现分歧时,将通过共识或第三方裁定来解决。证据综合将包括配对分析和单个参与者数据荟萃分析,并通过一组预先确定的分组探讨异质性。将根据偏倚风险、离群研究和 mTBI 定义标准对研究结果的稳健性进行敏感性分析。将使用 GRADE(建议、评估、发展和评价分级)报告估算结果的总体确定性。本方案提出了一种创新而有影响力的方法,以不断增长的有关创伤后脑损伤后 PTE 的知识为基础。通过对潜伏期的精确了解,这项研究可有助于早期检测、有针对性的干预和改善预后,从而对患者护理和生活质量产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信