A comprehensive evaluation of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
S. Gnanasekaran , V. Jayaraj , Yazhini V.B. , P.S. Mohanraj , C. Babu , N. Rajendran , V. Rajendran
{"title":"A comprehensive evaluation of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"S. Gnanasekaran ,&nbsp;V. Jayaraj ,&nbsp;Yazhini V.B. ,&nbsp;P.S. Mohanraj ,&nbsp;C. Babu ,&nbsp;N. Rajendran ,&nbsp;V. Rajendran","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite global recognition, WHO reports reveal significant gaps, with one in four healthcare facilities lacking basic water services, affecting over 1.8 billion people, and 21% lacking sanitation services, impacting 1.5 billion people, especially prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to critically evaluate the current state of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) facilities across a diverse range of healthcare settings. This review included various databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and grey literature; eligible studies employing various designs were scrutinized for WASH infrastructure and practices. Methodological quality was rigorously evaluated using the QuADS checklist. Data analysis, performed with R software, involved deriving pooled estimates of WASH intervention effects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted, employing statistical methods such as funnel plots to ensure robustness and mitigate biases. Of the 13,250 articles screened, 18 were included in this review. Meta-analyses revealed significant effect sizes for WASH interventions across domains – water (67.38%), sanitation (53.93%), waste management (40.82%), environment (56.58%), hygiene (66.83%), and management (42.30%). Widespread disparities in WASH persist across healthcare facilities, with rural areas facing notable deficits. Challenges in water quality, sanitation and waste management demand comprehensive, multi-sectoral approaches for improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite global recognition, WHO reports reveal significant gaps, with one in four healthcare facilities lacking basic water services, affecting over 1.8 billion people, and 21% lacking sanitation services, impacting 1.5 billion people, especially prevalent in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to critically evaluate the current state of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) facilities across a diverse range of healthcare settings. This review included various databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and grey literature; eligible studies employing various designs were scrutinized for WASH infrastructure and practices. Methodological quality was rigorously evaluated using the QuADS checklist. Data analysis, performed with R software, involved deriving pooled estimates of WASH intervention effects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted, employing statistical methods such as funnel plots to ensure robustness and mitigate biases. Of the 13,250 articles screened, 18 were included in this review. Meta-analyses revealed significant effect sizes for WASH interventions across domains – water (67.38%), sanitation (53.93%), waste management (40.82%), environment (56.58%), hygiene (66.83%), and management (42.30%). Widespread disparities in WASH persist across healthcare facilities, with rural areas facing notable deficits. Challenges in water quality, sanitation and waste management demand comprehensive, multi-sectoral approaches for improvement.

全面评估医疗机构中的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH):系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:尽管全球都认识到了这一点,但世界卫生组织的报告揭示了巨大的差距,每四家医疗机构中就有一家缺乏基本的供水服务,影响超过 18 亿人,21% 的医疗机构缺乏卫生服务,影响 15 亿人,这在中低收入国家(LMICs)尤为普遍。本研究旨在批判性地评估不同医疗环境中讲卫生运动设施的现状:本综述包括各种数据库,如 PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus 和灰色文献。采用 QuADS 核对表对研究方法的质量进行了严格评估。使用 R 软件进行的数据分析包括得出 WASH 干预效果的汇总估计值。采用漏斗图等统计方法进行了敏感性分析,以确保稳健性并减少偏差:在筛选出的 13250 篇文章中,有 18 篇被纳入本综述。元分析显示,讲卫生运动干预措施在各个领域都有显著的效果,包括水(67.38%)、卫生设施(53.93%)、废物管理(40.82%)、环境(56.58%)、个人卫生(66.83%)和管理(42.30%):结论:医疗保健设施(HCFs)在水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)方面普遍存在差异,农村地区面临明显不足。水质、环境卫生和废物管理方面的挑战要求采取全面、多部门的方法加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信