Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury: Matched cohort analysis comparing drug classes, medical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics with 24-month follow-up.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nicholas Dietz, Victoria Alkin, Nitin Agarwal, Martin Flores Bjurström, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Dengzhi Wang, Mayur Sharma, Doniel Drazin, Maxwell Boakye
{"title":"Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury: Matched cohort analysis comparing drug classes, medical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics with 24-month follow-up.","authors":"Nicholas Dietz, Victoria Alkin, Nitin Agarwal, Martin Flores Bjurström, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Dengzhi Wang, Mayur Sharma, Doniel Drazin, Maxwell Boakye","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and predisposes patients to increased risk of adverse events. Evaluation of long-term health consequences and economic burden of polypharmacy in patients with SCI is explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IBM Marketscan Research Databases claims-based dataset was queried to search for adult patients with SCI with a 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two matched cohorts were analyzed: those with and without polypharmacy, analyzing index hospitalization, readmissions, payments, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 569 individuals with SCI were included, of which 7235 (63%) were in the polypharmacy group who took a median of 11 separate drugs over two years. Opioid analgesics were the most common medication, present in 57% of patients with SCI meeting the criteria of polypharmacy, followed by antidepressant medications (46%) and muscle relaxants (40%). Risk of pneumonia was increased for the polypharmacy group (58%) compared to the non-polypharmacy group (45%), as were urinary tract infection (79% versus 63%), wound infection (30% versus 21%), depression (76% versus 57%), and adverse drug events (24% versus 15%) at 2 years. Combined median healthcare payments were higher in polypharmacy at 2 years ($44 333 vs. $10 937, P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of individuals with SCI met the criteria for polypharmacy with nearly 60% of those prescribed opioids and taking drugs from high-risk side effect profiles. Polypharmacy in SCI was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia, depression, urinary tract infections, adverse drug events, and emergency room visits over two years with four times higher overall healthcare payments at 1-year post-injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and predisposes patients to increased risk of adverse events. Evaluation of long-term health consequences and economic burden of polypharmacy in patients with SCI is explored.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Methods: The IBM Marketscan Research Databases claims-based dataset was queried to search for adult patients with SCI with a 2-year follow-up.

Participants: Two matched cohorts were analyzed: those with and without polypharmacy, analyzing index hospitalization, readmissions, payments, and health outcomes.

Results: A total of 11 569 individuals with SCI were included, of which 7235 (63%) were in the polypharmacy group who took a median of 11 separate drugs over two years. Opioid analgesics were the most common medication, present in 57% of patients with SCI meeting the criteria of polypharmacy, followed by antidepressant medications (46%) and muscle relaxants (40%). Risk of pneumonia was increased for the polypharmacy group (58%) compared to the non-polypharmacy group (45%), as were urinary tract infection (79% versus 63%), wound infection (30% versus 21%), depression (76% versus 57%), and adverse drug events (24% versus 15%) at 2 years. Combined median healthcare payments were higher in polypharmacy at 2 years ($44 333 vs. $10 937, P < .0001).

Conclusion: Majority of individuals with SCI met the criteria for polypharmacy with nearly 60% of those prescribed opioids and taking drugs from high-risk side effect profiles. Polypharmacy in SCI was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia, depression, urinary tract infections, adverse drug events, and emergency room visits over two years with four times higher overall healthcare payments at 1-year post-injury.

脊髓损伤患者的多重用药:比较药物类别、医疗并发症和医疗保健使用指标的匹配队列分析(24 个月随访)。
目的:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者多药治疗很常见,容易增加不良事件的风险。本文探讨了脊髓损伤患者多药治疗的长期健康后果和经济负担:设计:回顾性队列:方法:查询 IBM Marketscan Research Databases 以索赔为基础的数据集,搜索随访 2 年的 SCI 成年患者:分析了两个匹配队列:有多重药物治疗和没有多重药物治疗的队列,分析了指数住院、再入院、付款和健康结果:共纳入了 11 569 名 SCI 患者,其中 7235 人(63%)属于多药组,他们在两年内服用的药物中位数为 11 种。阿片类镇痛药是最常见的药物,在符合多种药物标准的 SCI 患者中占 57%,其次是抗抑郁药(46%)和肌肉松弛剂(40%)。与非多重用药组(45%)相比,多重用药组的肺炎风险增加(58%),2 年后尿路感染(79% 对 63%)、伤口感染(30% 对 21%)、抑郁(76% 对 57%)和药物不良事件(24% 对 15%)的风险也增加了。2年后,多药治疗的综合医疗费用中位数更高(44 333美元对10 937美元,P 结论:大多数 SCI 患者都符合多药治疗的标准,其中近 60% 的患者服用阿片类药物和副作用风险较高的药物。多药治疗与 SCI 患者在两年内患肺炎、抑郁症、尿路感染、药物不良事件和急诊就诊的更高风险相关,且在伤后一年内的总体医疗费用高出四倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信