Outcomes and Predictors of Success Following Multilevel Surgery in Positional and Nonpositional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1002/ohn.912
Hae E Noh, Min-Seok Rha, Yeonsu Jeong, Chang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho
{"title":"Outcomes and Predictors of Success Following Multilevel Surgery in Positional and Nonpositional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.","authors":"Hae E Noh, Min-Seok Rha, Yeonsu Jeong, Chang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ju Cho","doi":"10.1002/ohn.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the surgical outcomes and identify predictors of surgical success in patients with positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea following multilevel airway surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Singe-tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 158 patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent multilevel airway surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to position dependency: \"positional patients\" group (n = 100), and \"nonpositional patients\" group (n = 58). The characteristics and surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nonpositional group included younger and more obese patients in comparison to the positional group. Moreover, the nonpositional group had more severe disease than the positional group. Both groups showed overall improvement after surgery, and the surgical success rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (nonpositional, 41.4% vs positional, 48.0%; P = .424). Notably, 69.0% of patients belonging to the non-positional group converted to positional group postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that larger tonsil size, female sex, and higher mean O<sub>2</sub> saturation were associated with higher success rate in the positional group, whereas larger tonsil size was associated with surgical success in the nonpositional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both nonpositional and positional groups showed improvements following multilevel airway surgery, and surgery induced a transition from nonpositional to positional group. Given that the factors related to surgical success differed between the two groups, surgeons should consider position dependency and these distinct factors during decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1562-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes and identify predictors of surgical success in patients with positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea following multilevel airway surgery.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Singe-tertiary medical center.

Methods: This study included 158 patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent multilevel airway surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to position dependency: "positional patients" group (n = 100), and "nonpositional patients" group (n = 58). The characteristics and surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared.

Results: The nonpositional group included younger and more obese patients in comparison to the positional group. Moreover, the nonpositional group had more severe disease than the positional group. Both groups showed overall improvement after surgery, and the surgical success rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (nonpositional, 41.4% vs positional, 48.0%; P = .424). Notably, 69.0% of patients belonging to the non-positional group converted to positional group postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that larger tonsil size, female sex, and higher mean O2 saturation were associated with higher success rate in the positional group, whereas larger tonsil size was associated with surgical success in the nonpositional group.

Conclusion: Both nonpositional and positional groups showed improvements following multilevel airway surgery, and surgery induced a transition from nonpositional to positional group. Given that the factors related to surgical success differed between the two groups, surgeons should consider position dependency and these distinct factors during decision-making.

位置性和非位置性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停多层次手术的疗效和成功预测因素。
研究目的评估体位性和非体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者接受多水平气道手术后的手术效果,并确定手术成功的预测因素:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:本研究纳入了158名接受多水平气道手术的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者。根据体位依赖性将患者分为两组:"体位依赖患者 "组(100 人)和 "非体位依赖患者 "组(58 人)。比较了两组患者的特征和手术结果:结果:与体位性组相比,非体位性组的患者更年轻、更肥胖。此外,非体位组的病情比体位组严重。两组患者术后的整体情况都有所改善,手术成功率在两组之间没有明显差异(非体位性,41.4%;体位性,48.0%;P = .424)。值得注意的是,69.0% 的非体位组患者术后转为体位组。逻辑回归分析显示,扁桃体较大、女性和平均氧饱和度较高与体位组的成功率有关,而扁桃体较大与非体位组的手术成功率有关:结论:多水平气道手术后,非体位组和体位组都有所改善,手术促使非体位组向体位组过渡。鉴于两组手术成功的相关因素不同,外科医生在决策时应考虑体位依赖性和这些不同的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信