Complicated Pleural Infection is Associated With Prolonged Recovery and Reduced Functional Ability.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Austin M Meggyesy, Candice L Wilshire, Adam J Bograd, Shih Ting Chiu, Christopher R Gilbert, Najib M Rahman, Eihab O Bedawi, Eric Vallieres, Jed A Gorden
{"title":"Complicated Pleural Infection is Associated With Prolonged Recovery and Reduced Functional Ability.","authors":"Austin M Meggyesy, Candice L Wilshire, Adam J Bograd, Shih Ting Chiu, Christopher R Gilbert, Najib M Rahman, Eihab O Bedawi, Eric Vallieres, Jed A Gorden","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of complicated pleural infections (CPIs) had historically been surgical; however, following the publication of the second multicenter intrapleural sepsis trial (MIST-2), combination tissue plasminogen (tPA) and dornase (DNase) offers a less invasive and effective treatment. Our aim was to assess the quality of life (QOL) and functional ability of patients' recovery from a CPI managed with either intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) or surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 565 patients managed for a CPI between January 1, 2013 and March 31, 2018. There were 460 patients eligible for contact, attempted through 2 phone calls and one mailer. Two questionnaires were administered: the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) and a functional ability questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contact was made in 35% (159/460) of patients, and 57% (90/159) completed the survey. Patients had lower QOL scores compared to average US citizens; those managed with surgery had higher scores in physical functioning (surgery: 80, IPFT: 70, P=0.040) but lower pain scores (surgery: 58, IPFT: 68, P=0.045). Of 52 patients who returned to work, 48% (25) reported an impact on their work effectiveness during recovery, similarly between management strategies (IPFT: 50%, 13/26 vs. surgery: 46%, 12/26; P=0.781).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with a CPI had a lower QOL compared with average US citizens. Surgically managed patients reported improved physical functioning but worse pain compared with patients managed with IPFT. Patients returned to work within 4 weeks of discharge, and nearly half reported their ability to work effectively was impacted by their recovery. With further research into recovery timelines, patients may be appropriately counselled for expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of complicated pleural infections (CPIs) had historically been surgical; however, following the publication of the second multicenter intrapleural sepsis trial (MIST-2), combination tissue plasminogen (tPA) and dornase (DNase) offers a less invasive and effective treatment. Our aim was to assess the quality of life (QOL) and functional ability of patients' recovery from a CPI managed with either intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) or surgery.

Methods: We identified 565 patients managed for a CPI between January 1, 2013 and March 31, 2018. There were 460 patients eligible for contact, attempted through 2 phone calls and one mailer. Two questionnaires were administered: the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) and a functional ability questionnaire.

Results: Contact was made in 35% (159/460) of patients, and 57% (90/159) completed the survey. Patients had lower QOL scores compared to average US citizens; those managed with surgery had higher scores in physical functioning (surgery: 80, IPFT: 70, P=0.040) but lower pain scores (surgery: 58, IPFT: 68, P=0.045). Of 52 patients who returned to work, 48% (25) reported an impact on their work effectiveness during recovery, similarly between management strategies (IPFT: 50%, 13/26 vs. surgery: 46%, 12/26; P=0.781).

Conclusion: Patients with a CPI had a lower QOL compared with average US citizens. Surgically managed patients reported improved physical functioning but worse pain compared with patients managed with IPFT. Patients returned to work within 4 weeks of discharge, and nearly half reported their ability to work effectively was impacted by their recovery. With further research into recovery timelines, patients may be appropriately counselled for expectations.

并发胸膜感染与恢复期延长和功能减退有关。
背景:复杂性胸膜感染(CPI)的治疗历来以手术为主;然而,在第二次胸膜腔内脓毒症多中心试验(MIST-2)发表后,组织纤溶酶原(tPA)和多酶(DNase)联合疗法提供了一种创伤较小且有效的治疗方法。我们的目的是评估胸膜腔内纤维蛋白溶解疗法(IPFT)或手术治疗 CPI 患者的生活质量(QOL)和功能恢复能力:我们确定了 565 名在 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日期间接受 CPI 治疗的患者。符合联系条件的患者有 460 名,我们尝试通过两次电话和一次邮件进行联系。我们发放了两份问卷:36项健康调查简表(SF-36)和功能能力问卷:结果:35%(159/460)的患者取得了联系,57%(90/159)的患者完成了调查。与普通美国公民相比,患者的 QOL 评分较低;接受手术治疗的患者身体功能评分较高(手术:80,IPFT:70,P=0.040),但疼痛评分较低(手术:58,IPFT:68,P=0.045)。在52名重返工作岗位的患者中,48%(25人)表示在恢复期间工作效率受到影响,不同管理策略的影响情况类似(IPFT:50%,13/26;手术:46%,12/26;P=0.781):结论:与普通美国公民相比,CPI 患者的 QOL 较低。与接受 IPFT 治疗的患者相比,接受手术治疗的患者身体功能有所改善,但疼痛加剧。患者在出院后 4 周内重返工作岗位,近一半的患者表示他们的工作能力受到了康复的影响。通过对康复时间表的进一步研究,可以为患者提供适当的期望值咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信