FireSync EMS: A Novel Mobile Application for Burn Surface Area Calculation.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nicolas Malkoff, Brigette Cannata, Sarah Wang, Artur Manasyan, Joseph Maestas, Trevor A Pickering, Lyle Koegler, Saman Kashani, Maxwell B Johnson, Haig A Yenikomshian, T Justin Gillenwater
{"title":"FireSync EMS: A Novel Mobile Application for Burn Surface Area Calculation.","authors":"Nicolas Malkoff, Brigette Cannata, Sarah Wang, Artur Manasyan, Joseph Maestas, Trevor A Pickering, Lyle Koegler, Saman Kashani, Maxwell B Johnson, Haig A Yenikomshian, T Justin Gillenwater","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The percent total body surface area (TBSA) burned is a critical determinant of the required level of care, initial management, and prognosis in patients with burns. The current gold standard for estimating this measurement, the Lund-Browder (LB) chart, requires familiarity with its construction and may not be practical for use by first responders in the field. In this study, we present a novel burn surface area calculator mobile application developed for first responders and validate its accuracy. Infant, pediatric, and adult manikins were fabricated with 8 simulated burns of varying sizes and distributions. In total, 42 preclinical medical students and firefighters were tasked with estimating the TBSA of each burn using both the FireSync EMS app and LB chart. Univariate analysis and mixed-effects linear regression modeling were performed to compare the accuracy of both methods in relation to user experience, manikin size, and burn size. FireSync EMS significantly reduced overestimation bias (0.11%, SD 2.33 vs 0.91%, SD 4.12, P = .002), particularly for burns on child-size manikins (P < .001) and burns involving <10% (P = .005) and >20% (P = .030) TBSA. Multivariable modeling revealed that the LB chart was an independent determinant of the magnitude of estimation error, with a 1.19 times multiplicative effect relative to FireSync EMS (P < .001). The participants overwhelmingly found FireSync EMS easier, more intuitive, faster, and preferable (P < .001 for all). FireSync EMS may be an easier, faster, and more accurate alternative to the LB chart for estimation of the TBSA burned.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The percent total body surface area (TBSA) burned is a critical determinant of the required level of care, initial management, and prognosis in patients with burns. The current gold standard for estimating this measurement, the Lund-Browder (LB) chart, requires familiarity with its construction and may not be practical for use by first responders in the field. In this study, we present a novel burn surface area calculator mobile application developed for first responders and validate its accuracy. Infant, pediatric, and adult manikins were fabricated with 8 simulated burns of varying sizes and distributions. In total, 42 preclinical medical students and firefighters were tasked with estimating the TBSA of each burn using both the FireSync EMS app and LB chart. Univariate analysis and mixed-effects linear regression modeling were performed to compare the accuracy of both methods in relation to user experience, manikin size, and burn size. FireSync EMS significantly reduced overestimation bias (0.11%, SD 2.33 vs 0.91%, SD 4.12, P = .002), particularly for burns on child-size manikins (P < .001) and burns involving <10% (P = .005) and >20% (P = .030) TBSA. Multivariable modeling revealed that the LB chart was an independent determinant of the magnitude of estimation error, with a 1.19 times multiplicative effect relative to FireSync EMS (P < .001). The participants overwhelmingly found FireSync EMS easier, more intuitive, faster, and preferable (P < .001 for all). FireSync EMS may be an easier, faster, and more accurate alternative to the LB chart for estimation of the TBSA burned.

FireSync EMS:用于烧伤面积计算的新型移动应用程序。
烧伤的体表总面积百分比是决定烧伤患者所需护理水平、初始治疗和预后的关键因素。目前估算烧伤面积的黄金标准--伦德-布朗德烧伤面积计算表需要熟悉其结构,对于现场急救人员来说可能并不实用。在本研究中,我们介绍了一款专为急救人员开发的新型烧伤表面积计算器移动应用程序,并验证了其准确性。我们制作了婴儿、儿童和成人人体模型,模拟了八种不同大小和分布的烧伤。42 名临床前医科学生和消防员负责使用 FireSync-EMS 应用程序和 Lund-Browder 图表估算每种烧伤的总体表面积。通过单变量分析和混合效应线性回归模型,比较了两种方法的准确性与用户经验、人体模型大小和烧伤面积的关系。FireSync-EMS 显著降低了高估偏差(0.11%,SD 2.33 对 0.91%,SD 4.12,p = 0.002),尤其是儿童大小的人体模型上的烧伤(p < 0.001)和涉及 20% 总体表面积的烧伤(p = 0.030)。多变量模型显示,Lund-Browder 图表是估算误差大小的独立决定因素,与 FireSyncEMS 相比具有 1.19 倍的乘法效应(p < 0.001)。绝大多数参与者都认为 FireSync-EMS 更简单、更直观、更快速、更可取(p < 0.001)。FireSync-EMS 可能比 Lund-Browder 图表更简便、更快捷、更准确地估算出烧伤的总体表面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信