The Efficiency of Introducing Intrauterine Infusion of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Repeated Implantation Failure Patients: An Unblinded Randomised Clinical Trial.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Marzieh Mehrafza, Gholamreza Pourseify, Tahereh Zare Yousefi, Raoufi Azadeh, Sahar Saghati Jalali, Elmira Hosseinzadeh, Sajedeh Samadnia, Maliheh Habibdoost, Amirhossein Tamimi, Ahmad Hosseini
{"title":"The Efficiency of Introducing Intrauterine Infusion of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Repeated Implantation Failure Patients: An Unblinded Randomised Clinical Trial.","authors":"Marzieh Mehrafza, Gholamreza Pourseify, Tahereh Zare Yousefi, Raoufi Azadeh, Sahar Saghati Jalali, Elmira Hosseinzadeh, Sajedeh Samadnia, Maliheh Habibdoost, Amirhossein Tamimi, Ahmad Hosseini","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2024.2013900.1557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repeated implantation failure (RIF) refers to the condition where high quality embryos are unable to successfully implant after multiple cycles of <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of intrauterine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on pregnancy rate in patients with RIF.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present randomised clinical trial study was conducted at the IVF Centre of Mehr Medical Institute in Rasht, Iran, from 2020 to 2022. The research consisted of 200 individuals who had experienced multiple failed cycles. These patients were randomised into two groups: intrauterine infusion of 1 ml of G-CSF and intrauterine infusion of 1 ml autologous PRP at least 48 hours before embryo transfer (ET). The groups were compared in terms of implantation rate, and chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implantation rate was significantly higher in patients who received PRP (P=0.016). Chemical pregnancy in the PRP group was significantly higher than G-CSF group (P=0.003). Both clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the PRP group (P=0.001) compared to the G-CSF group (P=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilisation of PRP via intrauterine infusion is considerably more successful than G-CSF in enhancing pregnancy and live birth rates among patients with RIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"18 Suppl 1","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2013900.1557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Repeated implantation failure (RIF) refers to the condition where high quality embryos are unable to successfully implant after multiple cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of intrauterine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on pregnancy rate in patients with RIF.

Materials and methods: The present randomised clinical trial study was conducted at the IVF Centre of Mehr Medical Institute in Rasht, Iran, from 2020 to 2022. The research consisted of 200 individuals who had experienced multiple failed cycles. These patients were randomised into two groups: intrauterine infusion of 1 ml of G-CSF and intrauterine infusion of 1 ml autologous PRP at least 48 hours before embryo transfer (ET). The groups were compared in terms of implantation rate, and chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy.

Results: The implantation rate was significantly higher in patients who received PRP (P=0.016). Chemical pregnancy in the PRP group was significantly higher than G-CSF group (P=0.003). Both clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the PRP group (P=0.001) compared to the G-CSF group (P=0.02).

Conclusion: The utilisation of PRP via intrauterine infusion is considerably more successful than G-CSF in enhancing pregnancy and live birth rates among patients with RIF.

自体富血小板血浆与粒细胞集落刺激因子在反复植入失败患者中的应用效果:一项非盲随机临床试验。
背景:反复着床失败(RIF)是指优质胚胎在经过多个体外受精(IVF)周期治疗后仍无法成功着床。本研究旨在探讨宫内粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和富血小板血浆(PRP)对 RIF 患者妊娠率的影响:本随机临床试验研究于 2020 年至 2022 年在伊朗拉什特 Mehr 医学院 IVF 中心进行。研究对象包括 200 名经历过多个失败周期的患者。这些患者被随机分为两组:在胚胎移植(ET)前至少 48 小时宫腔内输注 1 毫升 G-CSF 和宫腔内输注 1 毫升自体 PRP。两组在植入率、化学妊娠、临床妊娠和持续妊娠方面进行了比较:结果:接受 PRP 的患者植入率明显更高(P=0.016)。PRP 组的化学妊娠率明显高于 G-CSF 组(P=0.003)。PRP组的临床妊娠率和持续妊娠率均明显高于G-CSF组(P=0.02)(P=0.001):结论:与 G-CSF 相比,通过宫腔内输注 PRP 更能提高 RIF 患者的妊娠率和活产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信