Evaluation of Turnaround Times of Diagnostic Biopsies: A Metric of Quality in Surgical Pathology.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PATHOLOGY
Anila Sharma, Vikas Nishadham, Prachi Gupta, Gurudutt Gupta, Deepak Sharma, Sneha Goel, Sunil Pasricha, Meenakshi Kamboj, Anurag Mehta
{"title":"Evaluation of Turnaround Times of Diagnostic Biopsies: A Metric of Quality in Surgical Pathology.","authors":"Anila Sharma, Vikas Nishadham, Prachi Gupta, Gurudutt Gupta, Deepak Sharma, Sneha Goel, Sunil Pasricha, Meenakshi Kamboj, Anurag Mehta","doi":"10.1177/10668969241261561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction</i>. Timely and accurate diagnosis of diseases is crucial for effective patient care. Turnaround time (TAT) in surgical pathology, defined as the time between accessioning the sample and reporting results, is a key performance indicator reflecting quality and efficiency. This study explores factors affecting TAT for diagnostic biopsies in a tertiary oncology hospital. <i>Methods.</i> A 1-month pilot study was conducted, focusing on 695 in-house diagnostic biopsies. Biopsies were categorized as routine (requiring only hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining) or complex cases (requiring additional tests). TAT was defined as the time between sample accessioning and report availability in the electronic medical record, with delays defined as exceeding 3 days for routine cases and 4 days for complex cases. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier plots was utilized to analyze TAT. <i>Results.</i> The overall mean TAT was 3.7 ± 2 days, with routine cases at 3.1 ± 2 days and complex cases at 4.8 ± 2 days (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed prolonged TAT for complex cases. Organ-specific analysis highlighted variations in TAT, with brain biopsies presenting the highest complexity and longest TAT. Surprisingly, malignant cases demonstrated slightly shorter TATs compared to benign cases (<i>P</i> = 0.026). Delays were observed in 34% of all cases. <i>Conclusions.</i> Laboratory TAT is crucial and is frequently used as a performance benchmark. We analyzed the various causes of delayed TAT in our hospital's histopathology department, with an emphasis on variables in the analytical phase. The results of this study demonstrate that cases involving ancillary techniques had significantly longer TATs compared to routine H&E cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":14416,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"344-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969241261561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Timely and accurate diagnosis of diseases is crucial for effective patient care. Turnaround time (TAT) in surgical pathology, defined as the time between accessioning the sample and reporting results, is a key performance indicator reflecting quality and efficiency. This study explores factors affecting TAT for diagnostic biopsies in a tertiary oncology hospital. Methods. A 1-month pilot study was conducted, focusing on 695 in-house diagnostic biopsies. Biopsies were categorized as routine (requiring only hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining) or complex cases (requiring additional tests). TAT was defined as the time between sample accessioning and report availability in the electronic medical record, with delays defined as exceeding 3 days for routine cases and 4 days for complex cases. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier plots was utilized to analyze TAT. Results. The overall mean TAT was 3.7 ± 2 days, with routine cases at 3.1 ± 2 days and complex cases at 4.8 ± 2 days (P < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed prolonged TAT for complex cases. Organ-specific analysis highlighted variations in TAT, with brain biopsies presenting the highest complexity and longest TAT. Surprisingly, malignant cases demonstrated slightly shorter TATs compared to benign cases (P = 0.026). Delays were observed in 34% of all cases. Conclusions. Laboratory TAT is crucial and is frequently used as a performance benchmark. We analyzed the various causes of delayed TAT in our hospital's histopathology department, with an emphasis on variables in the analytical phase. The results of this study demonstrate that cases involving ancillary techniques had significantly longer TATs compared to routine H&E cases.

评估诊断性活检的周转时间:手术病理质量的衡量标准。
简介及时准确地诊断疾病对有效护理病人至关重要。手术病理科的周转时间(TAT)是指从采集样本到报告结果之间的时间,是反映质量和效率的关键绩效指标。本研究探讨了影响一家三级肿瘤医院诊断性活检周转时间的因素。研究方法开展了一项为期 1 个月的试点研究,主要针对 695 例内部诊断性活检。活检分为常规病例(只需苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色)和复杂病例(需要额外检查)。TAT定义为从样本采集到电子病历中提供报告之间的时间,常规病例超过3天,复杂病例超过4天,即为延迟。使用 Kaplan-Meier 图对 TAT 进行生存分析。结果。总体平均 TAT 为 3.7 ± 2 天,常规病例为 3.1 ± 2 天,复杂病例为 4.8 ± 2 天(P P = 0.026)。34%的病例出现了延误。结论实验室 TAT 至关重要,经常被用作绩效基准。我们分析了本院组织病理科 TAT 延误的各种原因,重点是分析阶段的变量。研究结果表明,与常规 H&E 病例相比,涉及辅助技术的病例的 TAT 要长得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Surgical Pathology (IJSP) is a peer-reviewed journal published eight times a year, which offers original research and observations covering all major organ systems, timely reviews of new techniques and procedures, discussions of controversies in surgical pathology, case reports, and images in pathology. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信