Strengthening person-centered care through quality improvement: a mixed-methods study examining implementation of the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool in Zambian health facilities.
Amy Casella, Adamson Paxon Ndhlovu, Jessica E Posner, Lackeby Kawanga, Peteria Chan, Malia Duffy, Caitlin Madevu-Matson, Jemmy M Musangulule
{"title":"Strengthening person-centered care through quality improvement: a mixed-methods study examining implementation of the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool in Zambian health facilities.","authors":"Amy Casella, Adamson Paxon Ndhlovu, Jessica E Posner, Lackeby Kawanga, Peteria Chan, Malia Duffy, Caitlin Madevu-Matson, Jemmy M Musangulule","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2024.2378585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Person-centered care (PCC) is considered a fundamental approach to address clients' needs. There is a dearth of data on specific actions that HIV treatment providers identify as priorities to strengthen PCC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study team developed the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool (PCC-AT), which measures PCC service delivery within HIV treatment settings. The PCC-AT, including subsequent group action planning, was implemented across 29 facilities in Zambia among 173 HIV treatment providers. Mixed-methods study objectives included: (1) identify types of PCC-strengthening activities prioritized based upon low and high PCC-AT scores; (2) identify common themes in PCC implementation challenges and action plan activities by low and high PCC-AT score; and (3) determine differences in priority actions by facility ART clinic volume or geographic type.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study team conducted thematic analysis of action plan data and cross-tabulation queries to observe patterns across themes, PCC-AT scores, and key study variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis identified 39 themes across 29 action plans. A higher proportion of rural compared to urban facilities identified actions related to stigma and clients' rights training; accessibility of educational materials and gender-based violence training. A higher proportion of urban and peri-urban compared to rural facilities identified actions related to community-led monitoring.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings provide a basis to understand common PCC weaknesses and activities providers perceive as opportunities to strengthen experiences in care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To effectively support clients across the care continuum, systematic assessment of PCC services, action planning, continuous quality improvement interventions and re-measurements may be an important approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"2378585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2024.2378585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Person-centered care (PCC) is considered a fundamental approach to address clients' needs. There is a dearth of data on specific actions that HIV treatment providers identify as priorities to strengthen PCC.
Objective: This study team developed the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool (PCC-AT), which measures PCC service delivery within HIV treatment settings. The PCC-AT, including subsequent group action planning, was implemented across 29 facilities in Zambia among 173 HIV treatment providers. Mixed-methods study objectives included: (1) identify types of PCC-strengthening activities prioritized based upon low and high PCC-AT scores; (2) identify common themes in PCC implementation challenges and action plan activities by low and high PCC-AT score; and (3) determine differences in priority actions by facility ART clinic volume or geographic type.
Methods: The study team conducted thematic analysis of action plan data and cross-tabulation queries to observe patterns across themes, PCC-AT scores, and key study variables.
Results: The qualitative analysis identified 39 themes across 29 action plans. A higher proportion of rural compared to urban facilities identified actions related to stigma and clients' rights training; accessibility of educational materials and gender-based violence training. A higher proportion of urban and peri-urban compared to rural facilities identified actions related to community-led monitoring.
Discussion: Findings provide a basis to understand common PCC weaknesses and activities providers perceive as opportunities to strengthen experiences in care.
Conclusion: To effectively support clients across the care continuum, systematic assessment of PCC services, action planning, continuous quality improvement interventions and re-measurements may be an important approach.