Effectiveness of coma arousal therapy on patients with disorders of consciousness - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Circulation Pub Date : 2024-06-26 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/bc.bc_112_23
Sanjiv Kumar, Nupur Agarwal, Thankappan S Sanal
{"title":"Effectiveness of coma arousal therapy on patients with disorders of consciousness - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sanjiv Kumar, Nupur Agarwal, Thankappan S Sanal","doi":"10.4103/bc.bc_112_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disorders of consciousness (DOC) incorporate stages of awareness and arousal. Through coma arousal therapy sensory deprivation experienced by patients with DOC can be mitigated. Nevertheless, consensus concerning its effectiveness on these patients is still fractional.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aims to investigate the effectiveness of coma arousal therapies on patients with DOC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis was performed by searching electronic databases using search terms, the studies investigating the effect of coma arousal therapy in patients with DOC using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and Glasgow Coma Scale as outcome measures were included. The risk of bias was assessed, using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Further, analysis was conducted for the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 260 studies, 45 trials were reviewed and assessed for bias, with 31 studies included for analysis. The analysis demonstrates a significant difference in pre- and post - sensory stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation. Sensory stimulation showed the greatest mean difference of -4.96; 95% CI = -5.76 to - 4.15. The patients who underwent intervention after 3 months of illness showed significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The result shows that sensory stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial direct stimulation can improve behavioral outcomes of patients with DOC, wherein sensory stimulation is found to be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":9288,"journal":{"name":"Brain Circulation","volume":"10 2","pages":"119-133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bc.bc_112_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disorders of consciousness (DOC) incorporate stages of awareness and arousal. Through coma arousal therapy sensory deprivation experienced by patients with DOC can be mitigated. Nevertheless, consensus concerning its effectiveness on these patients is still fractional.

Purpose: This review aims to investigate the effectiveness of coma arousal therapies on patients with DOC.

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed by searching electronic databases using search terms, the studies investigating the effect of coma arousal therapy in patients with DOC using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and Glasgow Coma Scale as outcome measures were included. The risk of bias was assessed, using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Further, analysis was conducted for the included studies.

Results: Out of 260 studies, 45 trials were reviewed and assessed for bias, with 31 studies included for analysis. The analysis demonstrates a significant difference in pre- and post - sensory stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation. Sensory stimulation showed the greatest mean difference of -4.96; 95% CI = -5.76 to - 4.15. The patients who underwent intervention after 3 months of illness showed significant improvement.

Conclusion: The result shows that sensory stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial direct stimulation can improve behavioral outcomes of patients with DOC, wherein sensory stimulation is found to be more effective.

昏迷唤醒疗法对意识障碍患者的疗效--系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:意识障碍(DOC)包括意识和唤醒两个阶段。通过昏迷唤醒疗法可以减轻 DOC 患者的感觉剥夺。目的:本综述旨在研究昏迷唤醒疗法对 DOC 患者的有效性:方法:使用检索词搜索电子数据库进行荟萃分析,纳入以昏迷恢复量表-修订版和格拉斯哥昏迷量表为结果测量指标、调查昏迷唤醒疗法对 DOC 患者效果的研究。采用 Cochrane 和乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的批判性评估工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。此外,还对纳入的研究进行了分析:在 260 项研究中,对 45 项试验进行了审查和偏倚评估,并纳入了 31 项研究进行分析。分析表明,感觉刺激、迷走神经刺激、经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激前后有明显差异。感觉刺激的平均差异最大,为-4.96;95% CI = -5.76至-4.15。病程 3 个月后接受干预的患者病情明显好转:结果表明,感官刺激、经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激可改善 DOC 患者的行为结果,其中感官刺激更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Circulation
Brain Circulation Multiple-
自引率
5.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信