A systematic review of deep learning-based spinal bone lesion detection in medical images.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1177/02841851241263066
Bianca Teodorescu, Leonard Gilberg, Philip William Melton, Rudolph Matthias Hehr, Hamza Eren Guzel, Ali Murat Koc, Andre Baumgart, Leander Maerkisch, Elmer Jeto Gomes Ataide
{"title":"A systematic review of deep learning-based spinal bone lesion detection in medical images.","authors":"Bianca Teodorescu, Leonard Gilberg, Philip William Melton, Rudolph Matthias Hehr, Hamza Eren Guzel, Ali Murat Koc, Andre Baumgart, Leander Maerkisch, Elmer Jeto Gomes Ataide","doi":"10.1177/02841851241263066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal bone lesions encompass a wide array of pathologies, spanning from benign abnormalities to aggressive malignancies, such as diffusely localized metastases. Early detection and accurate differentiation of the underlying diseases is crucial for every patient's clinical treatment and outcome, with radiological imaging being a core element in the diagnostic pathway. Across numerous pathologies and imaging techniques, deep learning (DL) models are progressively considered a valuable resource in the clinical setting. This review describes not only the diagnostic performance of these models and the differing approaches in the field of spinal bone malignancy recognition, but also the lack of standardized methodology and reporting that we believe is currently hampering this newly founded area of research. In line with their established and reliable role in lesion detection, this publication focuses on both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as various derivative modalities (i.e. SPECT). After conducting a systematic literature search and subsequent analysis for applicability and quality using a modified QUADAS-2 scoring system, we confirmed that most of the 14 identified studies were plagued by major limitations, such as insufficient reporting of model statistics and data acquisition, a lacking external validation dataset, and potentially biased annotation. Although we experienced these limitations, we nonetheless conclude that the potential of these methods shines through in the presented results. These findings underline the need for more stringent quality controls in DL studies, as well as model development to afford increased insight and progress in this promising novel field.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1115-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241263066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal bone lesions encompass a wide array of pathologies, spanning from benign abnormalities to aggressive malignancies, such as diffusely localized metastases. Early detection and accurate differentiation of the underlying diseases is crucial for every patient's clinical treatment and outcome, with radiological imaging being a core element in the diagnostic pathway. Across numerous pathologies and imaging techniques, deep learning (DL) models are progressively considered a valuable resource in the clinical setting. This review describes not only the diagnostic performance of these models and the differing approaches in the field of spinal bone malignancy recognition, but also the lack of standardized methodology and reporting that we believe is currently hampering this newly founded area of research. In line with their established and reliable role in lesion detection, this publication focuses on both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as various derivative modalities (i.e. SPECT). After conducting a systematic literature search and subsequent analysis for applicability and quality using a modified QUADAS-2 scoring system, we confirmed that most of the 14 identified studies were plagued by major limitations, such as insufficient reporting of model statistics and data acquisition, a lacking external validation dataset, and potentially biased annotation. Although we experienced these limitations, we nonetheless conclude that the potential of these methods shines through in the presented results. These findings underline the need for more stringent quality controls in DL studies, as well as model development to afford increased insight and progress in this promising novel field.

基于深度学习的医学图像脊柱骨病变检测系统综述
脊柱骨病变包括一系列病理变化,从良性异常到侵袭性恶性肿瘤,如弥漫性局部转移。早期检测和准确区分潜在疾病对每位患者的临床治疗和预后至关重要,而放射成像是诊断路径中的核心要素。在众多病理和成像技术中,深度学习(DL)模型逐渐被认为是临床环境中的宝贵资源。这篇综述不仅介绍了这些模型的诊断性能和脊柱骨恶性肿瘤识别领域的不同方法,而且还介绍了标准化方法和报告的缺乏,我们认为这目前阻碍了这一新成立的研究领域。鉴于计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在病变检测中的可靠作用,本出版物将重点关注这两种成像技术以及各种衍生模式(如 SPECT)。在进行了系统的文献检索并使用修改后的 QUADAS-2 评分系统对适用性和质量进行分析后,我们确认 14 项已确定的研究中的大多数都存在重大局限性,如模型统计和数据采集报告不充分、缺乏外部验证数据集以及注释可能存在偏差等。尽管我们遇到了这些限制,但我们还是得出结论,这些方法的潜力在所提交的结果中得到了充分体现。这些发现强调了在 DL 研究中进行更严格的质量控制以及开发模型的必要性,以便在这一前景广阔的新领域中提高洞察力并取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信