Prioritizing Forestation in China Through Incorporating Biogeochemical and Local Biogeophysical Effects

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1029/2024EF004536
Yu Li, Pengyi Zhang, Huanhuan Wang, Hui Ma, Jie Zhao, Mengyang Xu, Mengyu Wang, Chenhui Guo, Chao Yue
{"title":"Prioritizing Forestation in China Through Incorporating Biogeochemical and Local Biogeophysical Effects","authors":"Yu Li,&nbsp;Pengyi Zhang,&nbsp;Huanhuan Wang,&nbsp;Hui Ma,&nbsp;Jie Zhao,&nbsp;Mengyang Xu,&nbsp;Mengyu Wang,&nbsp;Chenhui Guo,&nbsp;Chao Yue","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forestation is a key strategy for climate mitigation in China through its biogeochemical (BGC) effect of ecosystem carbon sequestration. Additionally, the BGC effect of forestation can be either reinforced or counteracted by concurrent biogeophysical processes (BGP effect) resulting in local land surface warming or cooling, which can be translated into CO<sub>2</sub>e (i.e., BGC effect) using a local transient climate response. Previous evaluations of the climate mitigation potential of future forestation in China have, however, focused on the BGC effect only and neglected the BGP effect, potentially leading to suboptimal forestation areas. Here, we determined priority forestation areas in China by incorporating both effects to maximize its global climate mitigation effect. Our results suggest an additional 167.2 Mha potentially suitable for forestation in China, exceeding the largest forestation target (86.8 Mha) possibly assumed by the government in 2060. The forestation-induced BGP effect (18.7 ± 61.9 tCO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup>) largely reinforces the BGC effect (458.2 ± 92.6 tCO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup>) in China, yielding a total climate mitigation effect of 476.9 ± 114.2 tCO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup> over 40 years (2021–2060). Under the 2060 forestation target, considering both BGC and BGP effects will displace 17.7% (15.3 Mha) of the forestation area derived by considering the BGC effect alone. Integrating both BGC and BGP effects will lead to a CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of 28.8 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e by 2060, 3.9 GtCO<sub>2</sub>e higher than the value obtained when considering the BGC effect only. Our results highlight the importance of considering BGP effect when making forestation policies for climate mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forestation is a key strategy for climate mitigation in China through its biogeochemical (BGC) effect of ecosystem carbon sequestration. Additionally, the BGC effect of forestation can be either reinforced or counteracted by concurrent biogeophysical processes (BGP effect) resulting in local land surface warming or cooling, which can be translated into CO2e (i.e., BGC effect) using a local transient climate response. Previous evaluations of the climate mitigation potential of future forestation in China have, however, focused on the BGC effect only and neglected the BGP effect, potentially leading to suboptimal forestation areas. Here, we determined priority forestation areas in China by incorporating both effects to maximize its global climate mitigation effect. Our results suggest an additional 167.2 Mha potentially suitable for forestation in China, exceeding the largest forestation target (86.8 Mha) possibly assumed by the government in 2060. The forestation-induced BGP effect (18.7 ± 61.9 tCO2e ha−1) largely reinforces the BGC effect (458.2 ± 92.6 tCO2e ha−1) in China, yielding a total climate mitigation effect of 476.9 ± 114.2 tCO2e ha−1 over 40 years (2021–2060). Under the 2060 forestation target, considering both BGC and BGP effects will displace 17.7% (15.3 Mha) of the forestation area derived by considering the BGC effect alone. Integrating both BGC and BGP effects will lead to a CO2 uptake of 28.8 GtCO2e by 2060, 3.9 GtCO2e higher than the value obtained when considering the BGC effect only. Our results highlight the importance of considering BGP effect when making forestation policies for climate mitigation.

Abstract Image

结合生物地球化学和当地生物地球物理效应,确定中国植树造林的优先次序
通过生态系统固碳的生物地球化学(BGC)效应,植树造林是中国减缓气候变化的一项关键战略。此外,造林的生物地球化学效应可被同时发生的生物地球物理过程(BGP 效应)所加强或抵消,从而导致局部地表变暖或变冷,并可通过局部瞬态气候响应转化为 CO2e(即 BGC 效应)。然而,以往对中国未来植树造林的气候减缓潜力的评估仅关注 BGC 效应,而忽视了 BGP 效应,这可能会导致植树造林区域不理想。在此,我们结合这两种效应确定了中国的优先造林区域,以最大限度地发挥其全球气候减缓效应。我们的研究结果表明,中国还有 1.672 亿公顷的土地可能适合造林,超过了政府可能假定的 2060 年最大造林目标(8,680 万公顷)。造林引起的 BGP 效应(18.7 ± 61.9 吨 CO2e 公顷-1)在很大程度上加强了中国的 BGC 效应(458.2 ± 92.6 吨 CO2e 公顷-1),在 40 年内(2021-2060 年)产生的总气候减缓效应为 476.9 ± 114.2 吨 CO2e 公顷-1。在 2060 年的造林目标下,同时考虑 BGC 和 BGP 的效应将取代仅考虑 BGC 效应得出的造林面积的 17.7% (1530 万公顷)。综合考虑 BGC 和 BGP 效应,到 2060 年,二氧化碳吸收量将达到 28.8 GtCO2e,比仅考虑 BGC 效应时的数值高出 3.9 GtCO2e。我们的研究结果凸显了在制定气候减缓造林政策时考虑 BGP 效应的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信