The Effect of Simulation Teaching Method on Midwifery Students' Knowledge and Skills of Vaginal Examination in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"The Effect of Simulation Teaching Method on Midwifery Students' Knowledge and Skills of Vaginal Examination in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In recent years, simulation teaching has been widely used as a teaching method to improve midwifery students' practical skills. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the simulation teaching method on midwifery students' knowledge and skills of vaginal examination in labor.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This is a randomized controlled experimental study and was conducted between November 08, 2022 and August 18, 2023. The research group consisted of third-year students in the midwifery department of a state university in Turkey . The study was completed with 32 students in the experimental group and 30 students in the control group. Student Identification Form, Vaginal Examination Procedural Information Form, Vaginal Examination Findings Record Form, and Vaginal Examination Knowledge Test were used as data collection tools.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the study, the Vaginal Examination Procedural Information Form score was found to be statistically significantly higher in the experimental group (<em>p</em> = .001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the Vaginal Examination Knowledge Test score. Cervical effacement (U = 3.930; <em>p</em> &lt; .001), cervical dilatation (U = 4.781; <em>p</em> &lt; .001), and fetal descent (U = 4.608; <em>p</em> &lt; .001) accuracy scores were significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Teaching vaginal examination in labor with simulation improved midwifery students' vaginal examination skills by increasing their procedural knowledge and accuracy in vaginal examination assessments in the clinical setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recent years, simulation teaching has been widely used as a teaching method to improve midwifery students' practical skills. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the simulation teaching method on midwifery students' knowledge and skills of vaginal examination in labor.

Method

This is a randomized controlled experimental study and was conducted between November 08, 2022 and August 18, 2023. The research group consisted of third-year students in the midwifery department of a state university in Turkey . The study was completed with 32 students in the experimental group and 30 students in the control group. Student Identification Form, Vaginal Examination Procedural Information Form, Vaginal Examination Findings Record Form, and Vaginal Examination Knowledge Test were used as data collection tools.

Results

In the study, the Vaginal Examination Procedural Information Form score was found to be statistically significantly higher in the experimental group (p = .001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the Vaginal Examination Knowledge Test score. Cervical effacement (U = 3.930; p < .001), cervical dilatation (U = 4.781; p < .001), and fetal descent (U = 4.608; p < .001) accuracy scores were significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group.

Conclusion

Teaching vaginal examination in labor with simulation improved midwifery students' vaginal examination skills by increasing their procedural knowledge and accuracy in vaginal examination assessments in the clinical setting.

模拟教学法对助产士学生分娩阴道检查知识和技能的影响:随机对照研究
背景近年来,模拟教学作为一种提高助产专业学生实践技能的教学方法被广泛应用。本研究旨在评估模拟教学法对助产士学生分娩阴道检查知识和技能的影响。方法这是一项随机对照实验研究,研究时间为 2022 年 11 月 08 日至 2023 年 8 月 18 日。研究小组由土耳其一所国立大学助产系的三年级学生组成。实验组有 32 名学生,对照组有 30 名学生。数据收集工具包括学生身份识别表、阴道检查程序信息表、阴道检查结果记录表和阴道检查知识测试。结果在研究中发现,实验组的阴道检查程序信息表得分显著高于对照组(P = .001)。在阴道检查知识测试得分方面,两组间无明显差异。与对照组相比,实验组的宫颈外口(U = 3.930; p <.001)、宫颈扩张(U = 4.781; p <.001)和胎儿下降(U = 4.608; p <.001)准确度得分明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信