Unveiling the dynamics of AI applications: A review of reviews using scientometrics and BERTopic modeling

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Raghu Raman , Debidutta Pattnaik , Laurie Hughes , Prema Nedungadi
{"title":"Unveiling the dynamics of AI applications: A review of reviews using scientometrics and BERTopic modeling","authors":"Raghu Raman ,&nbsp;Debidutta Pattnaik ,&nbsp;Laurie Hughes ,&nbsp;Prema Nedungadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a world that has rapidly transformed through the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), our systematic review, guided by the PRISMA protocol, investigates a decade of AI research, revealing insights into its evolution and impact. Our study, examining 3,767 articles, has drawn considerable attention, as evidenced by an impressive 63,577 citations, underscoring the scholarly community's profound engagement. Our study reveals a collaborative landscape with 18,189 contributing authors, reflecting a robust network of researchers advancing AI and machine learning applications. Review categories focus on systematic reviews and bibliometric analyses, indicating an increasing emphasis on comprehensive literature synthesis and quantitative analysis. The findings also suggest an opportunity to explore emerging methodologies such as topic modeling and meta-analysis. We dissect the state of the art presented in these reviews, finding themes throughout the broad scholarly discourse through thematic clustering and BERTopic modeling. Categorization of study articles across fields of research indicates dominance in <em>Information and Computing Sciences</em>, followed by <em>Biomedical and Clinical Sciences</em>. Subject categories reveal interconnected clusters across various sectors, notably in healthcare, engineering, business intelligence, and computational technologies. Semantic analysis via BERTopic revealed nineteen clusters mapped to themes such as <em>AI in health innovations, AI for sustainable development, AI and deep learning, AI in education,</em> and <em>ethical considerations</em>. Future research directions are suggested, emphasizing the need for intersectional bias mitigation, holistic health approaches, AI's role in environmental sustainability, and the ethical deployment of generative AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000568/pdfft?md5=63ad1459312d93e8979da1b39a7713eb&pid=1-s2.0-S2444569X24000568-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000568","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world that has rapidly transformed through the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), our systematic review, guided by the PRISMA protocol, investigates a decade of AI research, revealing insights into its evolution and impact. Our study, examining 3,767 articles, has drawn considerable attention, as evidenced by an impressive 63,577 citations, underscoring the scholarly community's profound engagement. Our study reveals a collaborative landscape with 18,189 contributing authors, reflecting a robust network of researchers advancing AI and machine learning applications. Review categories focus on systematic reviews and bibliometric analyses, indicating an increasing emphasis on comprehensive literature synthesis and quantitative analysis. The findings also suggest an opportunity to explore emerging methodologies such as topic modeling and meta-analysis. We dissect the state of the art presented in these reviews, finding themes throughout the broad scholarly discourse through thematic clustering and BERTopic modeling. Categorization of study articles across fields of research indicates dominance in Information and Computing Sciences, followed by Biomedical and Clinical Sciences. Subject categories reveal interconnected clusters across various sectors, notably in healthcare, engineering, business intelligence, and computational technologies. Semantic analysis via BERTopic revealed nineteen clusters mapped to themes such as AI in health innovations, AI for sustainable development, AI and deep learning, AI in education, and ethical considerations. Future research directions are suggested, emphasizing the need for intersectional bias mitigation, holistic health approaches, AI's role in environmental sustainability, and the ethical deployment of generative AI.

揭示人工智能应用的动态:使用科学计量学和 BERTopic 建模的评论综述
人工智能(AI)的出现迅速改变了世界,在 PRISMA 协议的指导下,我们的系统性综述对十年来的人工智能研究进行了调查,揭示了人工智能的演变和影响。我们的研究共审查了 3,767 篇文章,引起了广泛关注,引用次数高达 63,577 次,显示了学术界的深度参与。我们的研究揭示了一个拥有 18,189 位投稿作者的合作环境,反映了一个由推动人工智能和机器学习应用的研究人员组成的强大网络。综述类别主要集中在系统综述和文献计量分析,这表明人们越来越重视全面的文献综述和定量分析。研究结果还表明,我们有机会探索主题建模和荟萃分析等新兴方法。我们通过主题聚类和 BERTopic 建模对这些综述中呈现的技术现状进行了剖析,并在广泛的学术讨论中找到了主题。对各研究领域的研究文章进行分类后发现,信息与计算科学占主导地位,其次是生物医学和临床科学。主题类别揭示了各个领域相互关联的集群,特别是在医疗保健、工程、商业智能和计算技术领域。通过 BERTopic 进行的语义分析表明,有 19 个集群与人工智能在健康创新中的应用、人工智能促进可持续发展、人工智能与深度学习、人工智能在教育中的应用以及伦理考虑等主题相关联。报告提出了未来的研究方向,强调了减少交叉偏见的必要性、整体健康方法、人工智能在环境可持续发展中的作用以及生成式人工智能的伦理部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信