Improving preparation for pharmacy entry-to-practice OSCE using a participatory action research

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Catherine Huneault , Philippe Haeberli , Alexandra Mühle , Philippe Laurent , Jérôme Berger
{"title":"Improving preparation for pharmacy entry-to-practice OSCE using a participatory action research","authors":"Catherine Huneault ,&nbsp;Philippe Haeberli ,&nbsp;Alexandra Mühle ,&nbsp;Philippe Laurent ,&nbsp;Jérôme Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In Switzerland, becoming a licensed pharmacist requires succeeding a federal entry-to-practice exam that includes an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Candidates from the University of Geneva (UNIGE) exhibited a higher failure rate in this part of the examination in comparison to candidates from other Swiss institutions. The institution made a specific set of pedagogical changes to a 3-week pharmacy services course that is run during their Master's second year to prepare them for their entry-to-practice OSCE. One key change was a switch from a summative in-classroom OSCE to an on-line formative OSCE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>New teaching activities were introduced between 2019 2020 and 2021–2022 academic years to help students strengthen their patient-facing skills and prepare for the federal OSCE. These online activities consisted in formative OSCEs supplemented with group and individual debriefings and in 18 h clinical case simulations reproducing OSCE requirements and assessed with standardized evaluation grids. Failure rates before and after the introduction of these activities were compared, and their perceived usefulness by UNIGE candidates was collected through a questionnaire survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The UNIGE failure rate decreased from 6.8% in 2018/2019 to 3.3% in 2022 following the implementation of the new teaching activities. The difference in failure rates between UNIGE and the other institutions became less pronounced in 2022 compared to 2018/2019. The redesigned Master's course was highlighted as useful for preparation, with all new activities perceived as beneficial. Questionnaire responses brought attention to challenges faced by UNIGE candidates, including stress management, insufficient information or practical training, and experiences related to quarantine. These insights informed further development of teaching methods.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Although the results do not establish a direct link between participation in new teaching activities and increased performance, they suggest resolving the initial issue. Our findings relate to pedagogical concepts such as constructive alignment, formative assessment and examination anxiety, and generally support the benefits of online format.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study used a participatory action research based on mixed methods to address a challenge in pharmacy education. Online teaching activities including formative OSCEs, case simulations and debriefings were implemented. Improved performance in entry-to-practice OSCE was subsequently observed. The results highlight the potential of formative, active, and constructively aligned online activities, such as role-playing and case simulation, to enhance patient-facing skills and improve outcomes in summative assessments of these skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 11","pages":"Article 102152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724001849/pdfft?md5=af5b1aefa6106a852172d9bebce83ec5&pid=1-s2.0-S1877129724001849-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724001849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In Switzerland, becoming a licensed pharmacist requires succeeding a federal entry-to-practice exam that includes an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Candidates from the University of Geneva (UNIGE) exhibited a higher failure rate in this part of the examination in comparison to candidates from other Swiss institutions. The institution made a specific set of pedagogical changes to a 3-week pharmacy services course that is run during their Master's second year to prepare them for their entry-to-practice OSCE. One key change was a switch from a summative in-classroom OSCE to an on-line formative OSCE.

Methods

New teaching activities were introduced between 2019 2020 and 2021–2022 academic years to help students strengthen their patient-facing skills and prepare for the federal OSCE. These online activities consisted in formative OSCEs supplemented with group and individual debriefings and in 18 h clinical case simulations reproducing OSCE requirements and assessed with standardized evaluation grids. Failure rates before and after the introduction of these activities were compared, and their perceived usefulness by UNIGE candidates was collected through a questionnaire survey.

Results

The UNIGE failure rate decreased from 6.8% in 2018/2019 to 3.3% in 2022 following the implementation of the new teaching activities. The difference in failure rates between UNIGE and the other institutions became less pronounced in 2022 compared to 2018/2019. The redesigned Master's course was highlighted as useful for preparation, with all new activities perceived as beneficial. Questionnaire responses brought attention to challenges faced by UNIGE candidates, including stress management, insufficient information or practical training, and experiences related to quarantine. These insights informed further development of teaching methods.

Discussion

Although the results do not establish a direct link between participation in new teaching activities and increased performance, they suggest resolving the initial issue. Our findings relate to pedagogical concepts such as constructive alignment, formative assessment and examination anxiety, and generally support the benefits of online format.

Conclusion

This study used a participatory action research based on mixed methods to address a challenge in pharmacy education. Online teaching activities including formative OSCEs, case simulations and debriefings were implemented. Improved performance in entry-to-practice OSCE was subsequently observed. The results highlight the potential of formative, active, and constructively aligned online activities, such as role-playing and case simulation, to enhance patient-facing skills and improve outcomes in summative assessments of these skills.

利用参与式行动研究改进药学入门执业 OSCE 的准备工作
导言在瑞士,要成为一名执业药剂师,必须通过包括客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在内的联邦执业资格考试。与瑞士其他院校的考生相比,日内瓦大学(UNIGE)的考生在这部分考试中的不及格率较高。该院校对硕士第二学年开设的为期 3 周的药学服务课程进行了一系列具体的教学改革,以帮助他们为进入执业阶段的 OSCE 考试做好准备。方法在 2019-2020 学年和 2021-2022 学年之间引入了新的教学活动,以帮助学生加强面对患者的技能,并为联邦 OSCE 做准备。这些在线活动包括以小组和个人汇报为补充的形成性OSCE,以及重现OSCE要求的18小时临床病例模拟,并以标准化评估网格进行评估。对引入这些活动前后的不及格率进行了比较,并通过问卷调查收集了UNIGE考生对其有用性的看法。结果在实施新的教学活动后,UNIGE的不及格率从2018/2019年度的6.8%降至2022年度的3.3%。与 2018/2019 学年相比,2022 年联合国大学与其他院校之间的不及格率差异变得不那么明显。重新设计的硕士课程被强调有助于备考,所有新活动都被认为是有益的。调查问卷的答复引起了对IGE 候选人所面临挑战的关注,包括压力管理、信息或实践培训不足以及与检疫有关的经历。这些见解为进一步开发教学方法提供了依据。讨论虽然结果并没有确定参与新教学活动与成绩提高之间的直接联系,但它们建议解决最初的问题。我们的研究结果与教学概念有关,如建设性调整、形成性评估和考试焦虑,总体上支持在线形式的益处。结论本研究采用基于混合方法的参与式行动研究来应对药学教育中的挑战。在线教学活动包括形成性 OSCE、案例模拟和汇报。随后观察到学生在入职执业 OSCE 考试中的成绩有所提高。研究结果凸显了角色扮演和病例模拟等形成性、积极和建设性的在线活动在提高面向患者的技能和改善这些技能的终结性评估结果方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信