Xue-Ying Lin , Gui-Fei Chen , Zi-Xiao Jiang , Yi-Tao Xing , Yang-Yang Liu
{"title":"New terpenoids from Callicarpa nudiflora and their chemotaxonomic significance","authors":"Xue-Ying Lin , Gui-Fei Chen , Zi-Xiao Jiang , Yi-Tao Xing , Yang-Yang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The comprehensive phytochemical investigation of the <em>Callicarpa nudiflora</em> resulted in the isolation of a new labdane diterpenoid 16(<em>R</em>/<em>S</em>)-3,4-<em>seco</em>-11<em>E</em>,13<em>E</em>-labdien-15,16-olide-3-al (<strong>2</strong>), together with sixteen known compounds: two sesquiterpenoids (1<em>R</em>,3<em>S</em>,4<em>R</em>,5<em>S</em>,9<em>S</em>)-3,4-epoxy-5-hydroxy-8(13)-caryophyllen (<strong>1</strong>), and 4<em>β</em>,10<em>α</em>-aromadendranediol (<strong>3</strong>), eight labdane analogues (<strong>4</strong>–<strong>11</strong>), a pimarane-type diterpenoid (<strong>12</strong>), three flavonoids (<strong>13</strong>–<strong>15</strong>), and two lignans (<strong>16</strong>, <strong>and 17</strong>). The structures were elucidated by extensive NMR and HRESIMS analysis. This marks the first comprehensive report of the NMR data of compound <strong>1</strong>, as well as the absolute configurations of compounds <strong>1</strong> and <strong>3</strong>. The chemotaxonomic significance of the isolated compounds was also discussed. Compounds <strong>1</strong>, <strong>3</strong>, <strong>14</strong>, <strong>16</strong>, and <strong>17</strong> were being reported from the genus <em>Callicarpa</em> for the first time, while 3,4-<em>seco</em>-labdane diterpenoids <strong>4</strong>–<strong>11</strong> were previously obtained only from <em>C. nudiflora.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 104872"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824000905","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The comprehensive phytochemical investigation of the Callicarpa nudiflora resulted in the isolation of a new labdane diterpenoid 16(R/S)-3,4-seco-11E,13E-labdien-15,16-olide-3-al (2), together with sixteen known compounds: two sesquiterpenoids (1R,3S,4R,5S,9S)-3,4-epoxy-5-hydroxy-8(13)-caryophyllen (1), and 4β,10α-aromadendranediol (3), eight labdane analogues (4–11), a pimarane-type diterpenoid (12), three flavonoids (13–15), and two lignans (16, and 17). The structures were elucidated by extensive NMR and HRESIMS analysis. This marks the first comprehensive report of the NMR data of compound 1, as well as the absolute configurations of compounds 1 and 3. The chemotaxonomic significance of the isolated compounds was also discussed. Compounds 1, 3, 14, 16, and 17 were being reported from the genus Callicarpa for the first time, while 3,4-seco-labdane diterpenoids 4–11 were previously obtained only from C. nudiflora.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.