An evaluation of intervention appropriateness from the perspective of parents: A peer-mediated, play-based intervention for children with ADHD.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Lauren Parsons, Dave Parsons, Natasha Mahoney, Nicola Hancock, Reinie Cordier, Michelle Lincoln, Yu-Wei Ryan Chen, Anita Bundy
{"title":"An evaluation of intervention appropriateness from the perspective of parents: A peer-mediated, play-based intervention for children with ADHD.","authors":"Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Lauren Parsons, Dave Parsons, Natasha Mahoney, Nicola Hancock, Reinie Cordier, Michelle Lincoln, Yu-Wei Ryan Chen, Anita Bundy","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A peer-mediated, play-based intervention has been developed to address social participation challenges experienced by children with ADHD. To facilitate implementation into clinical practice, interventions should be evaluated for appropriateness to the end-user, as well as effectiveness. Previous research demonstrated the approach is effective for improving children's social play skills. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of the intervention for children with ADHD and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents of children with ADHD who participated in the play-based intervention were interviewed 1 month after completion. Parents were asked about their perspective of parent and children's experiences of the intervention, the perceived benefits for children and parents, the logistics of participating, and recommended adaptations to the intervention. Interviews were analysed thematically, and themes were mapped to the elements of the adopted definition of appropriateness to understand whether parents supported the appropriateness of the intervention for their families.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community involvement: </strong>Consumers were not directly involved in the decisions made about this study.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>One core theme, 'collaborative efforts', emerged from the data. Major themes comprising the core theme were 'on the same page', 'therapeutic relationship', and 'getting the job done'. Three sub-themes of 'engagement and motivation', 'the effort was worth it for the reward', and 'Rome wasn't built in a day' were nested within the major themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents largely supported the appropriateness of the intervention, indicating it addressed an important goal for their child, participation was a positive experience, and they perceived the intervention to be beneficial. Future adaptions of the intervention are needed to increase its ecological validity and to generalise the strategies to other social environments and playmates, such as peers at school.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study looked at an intervention that uses play with peers to help children with ADHD develop their play skills. The researchers wanted to know if parents thought the intervention was a good fit for their families and if it helped their children. Parents gave an interview a month after the intervention ended. They were asked about their thoughts on the intervention, how it helped their children and themselves, how easy it was to take part, and what changes could be made to make the intervention better. After analysing parents' answers, the researchers found parents mostly agreed that the intervention was a good fit. They said it helped their children to play with their peers, and they had a good time doing it. Parents thought the intervention was helpful, they liked that it was a joint effort between them and the occupational therapist, and they felt it was worth the effort. However, they also suggested some changes. They wanted the intervention to fit into other real-life social situations, such as school, so their children could use the skills they learned in other places. Overall, parents thought the intervention was helpful and suitable for their children and themselves, but some changes might make it more helpful.</p>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A peer-mediated, play-based intervention has been developed to address social participation challenges experienced by children with ADHD. To facilitate implementation into clinical practice, interventions should be evaluated for appropriateness to the end-user, as well as effectiveness. Previous research demonstrated the approach is effective for improving children's social play skills. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of the intervention for children with ADHD and their families.

Methods: Parents of children with ADHD who participated in the play-based intervention were interviewed 1 month after completion. Parents were asked about their perspective of parent and children's experiences of the intervention, the perceived benefits for children and parents, the logistics of participating, and recommended adaptations to the intervention. Interviews were analysed thematically, and themes were mapped to the elements of the adopted definition of appropriateness to understand whether parents supported the appropriateness of the intervention for their families.

Consumer and community involvement: Consumers were not directly involved in the decisions made about this study.

Findings: One core theme, 'collaborative efforts', emerged from the data. Major themes comprising the core theme were 'on the same page', 'therapeutic relationship', and 'getting the job done'. Three sub-themes of 'engagement and motivation', 'the effort was worth it for the reward', and 'Rome wasn't built in a day' were nested within the major themes.

Conclusion: Parents largely supported the appropriateness of the intervention, indicating it addressed an important goal for their child, participation was a positive experience, and they perceived the intervention to be beneficial. Future adaptions of the intervention are needed to increase its ecological validity and to generalise the strategies to other social environments and playmates, such as peers at school.

Plain language summary: This study looked at an intervention that uses play with peers to help children with ADHD develop their play skills. The researchers wanted to know if parents thought the intervention was a good fit for their families and if it helped their children. Parents gave an interview a month after the intervention ended. They were asked about their thoughts on the intervention, how it helped their children and themselves, how easy it was to take part, and what changes could be made to make the intervention better. After analysing parents' answers, the researchers found parents mostly agreed that the intervention was a good fit. They said it helped their children to play with their peers, and they had a good time doing it. Parents thought the intervention was helpful, they liked that it was a joint effort between them and the occupational therapist, and they felt it was worth the effort. However, they also suggested some changes. They wanted the intervention to fit into other real-life social situations, such as school, so their children could use the skills they learned in other places. Overall, parents thought the intervention was helpful and suitable for their children and themselves, but some changes might make it more helpful.

从家长的角度评估干预措施的适宜性:以同伴为媒介、以游戏为基础的多动症儿童干预。
简介我们开发了一种以同伴为媒介、以游戏为基础的干预措施,以应对多动症儿童在社会参与方面遇到的挑战。为便于在临床实践中实施,应评估干预措施是否适合最终用户以及是否有效。先前的研究表明,该方法能有效提高儿童的社交游戏技能。本研究旨在评估该干预措施对多动症儿童及其家庭的适宜性:方法:参加游戏干预的多动症儿童的家长在干预完成 1 个月后接受了访谈。家长们被问及他们对家长和儿童在干预中的体验的看法、对儿童和家长带来的益处的看法、参与干预的后勤保障以及对干预的调整建议。对访谈内容进行了主题分析,并将主题与所采用的适当性定义的要素进行了映射,以了解家长是否支持干预措施对其家庭的适当性:消费者和社区的参与:消费者没有直接参与本研究的决策:数据中出现了一个核心主题,即 "合作努力"。构成这一核心主题的主要主题是 "同心协力"、"治疗关系 "和 "完成工作"。三个次主题分别是 "参与和动力"、"付出是值得的 "和 "罗马不是一天建成的":结论:家长们普遍支持该干预措施的适当性,并表示它解决了他们孩子的一个重要目标,参与是一种积极的体验,而且他们认为该干预措施是有益的。今后需要对干预措施进行调整,以提高其生态效度,并将干预策略推广到其他社会环境和玩伴中,如学校里的同伴。研究人员想知道家长是否认为这种干预适合他们的家庭,是否对他们的孩子有帮助。干预结束一个月后,家长们接受了采访。他们被问及对干预的看法、干预对他们的孩子和他们自己有什么帮助、参加干预的难易程度,以及有哪些改变可以使干预更好。在对家长的回答进行分析后,研究人员发现家长们大多认为干预措施非常合适。他们说,这有助于孩子与同伴一起玩耍,而且他们玩得很开心。家长们认为这种干预很有帮助,他们喜欢这种由他们和职业治疗师共同努力的方式,而且他们觉得这种努力是值得的。不过,他们也提出了一些修改建议。他们希望干预能融入其他现实生活中的社交场合,如学校,这样他们的孩子就能在其他地方使用学到的技能。总的来说,家长们认为这项干预措施对他们的孩子和他们自己都很有帮助,也很合适,但一些改变可能会使它更有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信