Women's decision-making power can influence modern contraceptive use: Evidence from Bangladesh

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jahar Bhowmik, Raaj Kishore Biswas, Joanne Williams, Sima Rani Dey
{"title":"Women's decision-making power can influence modern contraceptive use: Evidence from Bangladesh","authors":"Jahar Bhowmik,&nbsp;Raaj Kishore Biswas,&nbsp;Joanne Williams,&nbsp;Sima Rani Dey","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>It is generally believed that gender inequality and women's lack of decision-making power may restrict women's use of modern contraception, leading to high rates of unwanted pregnancies, abortions, and deaths. Evidence shows that empowered women are more likely to use modern contraception methods, but few studies have investigated this across multiple domains of empowerment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined the associations between women's empowerment and modern contraception use in Bangladesh. Data from a sample of 16,834 married women aged 15–49 years from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018 were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Complex survey weight adjusted logistic models were fitted to evaluate the associations after adjusting for clusters, strata, and sampling weights.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>indicate that just over half of the married women (55.7%) had used modern contraception methods. Women's empowerment was associated with contraceptive use, especially decision-making power. Women who had medium or high autonomy of household decision making were likely to have 20% (AOR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04–1.39) and 27% (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11–1.45) increased odds of using modern contraceptives compared to those who scored low in the decision-making domain. The findings demonstrated strong evidence of direct influence of women's decision-making power on modern contraception use. The results also found influence of several socio-demographic factors including area of residence, husband's age, wealth index and mobile phone ownership on the use of modern contraceptives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Future interventions can focus on integrating women's empowerment into family planning programming, with a particular focus on enhancing women's autonomy in decision making.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":"39 5","pages":"1503-1515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3822","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

It is generally believed that gender inequality and women's lack of decision-making power may restrict women's use of modern contraception, leading to high rates of unwanted pregnancies, abortions, and deaths. Evidence shows that empowered women are more likely to use modern contraception methods, but few studies have investigated this across multiple domains of empowerment.

Study design

This study examined the associations between women's empowerment and modern contraception use in Bangladesh. Data from a sample of 16,834 married women aged 15–49 years from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–2018 were analysed.

Methods

Complex survey weight adjusted logistic models were fitted to evaluate the associations after adjusting for clusters, strata, and sampling weights.

Results

indicate that just over half of the married women (55.7%) had used modern contraception methods. Women's empowerment was associated with contraceptive use, especially decision-making power. Women who had medium or high autonomy of household decision making were likely to have 20% (AOR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04–1.39) and 27% (AOR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11–1.45) increased odds of using modern contraceptives compared to those who scored low in the decision-making domain. The findings demonstrated strong evidence of direct influence of women's decision-making power on modern contraception use. The results also found influence of several socio-demographic factors including area of residence, husband's age, wealth index and mobile phone ownership on the use of modern contraceptives.

Discussion

Future interventions can focus on integrating women's empowerment into family planning programming, with a particular focus on enhancing women's autonomy in decision making.

妇女的决策权可影响现代避孕药具的使用:孟加拉国的证据。
目标:人们普遍认为,性别不平等和妇女缺乏决策权可能会限制妇女使用现代避孕方法,从而导致意外怀孕、流产和死亡的高发生率。有证据表明,获得权力的妇女更有可能使用现代避孕方法,但很少有研究对这一点进行跨领域的调查:本研究探讨了孟加拉国妇女赋权与现代避孕方法使用之间的关系。研究分析了 2017-2018 年孟加拉国人口与健康调查中 16834 名 15-49 岁已婚妇女的样本数据:结果:结果显示,略高于一半的已婚妇女(55.7%)使用过现代避孕方法。妇女赋权与避孕药具的使用有关,尤其是决策权。与在决策领域得分较低的妇女相比,在家庭决策方面拥有中等或高等自主权的妇女使用现代避孕药具的几率分别增加了 20%(AOR = 1.20;95% CI:1.04-1.39)和 27%(AOR = 1.27,95% CI:1.11-1.45)。研究结果有力地证明了妇女的决策权对现代避孕药具使用的直接影响。研究结果还发现了一些社会人口因素对现代避孕药具使用的影响,包括居住地区、丈夫年龄、财富指数和手机拥有量:讨论:未来的干预措施可侧重于将妇女赋权纳入计划生育计划,特别是提高妇女的决策自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信