Randomized Controlled Trial of a Text-Based Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Intervention for Rural and Medically Underserved Communities.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Devon Noonan, Susan G Silva, Laura J Fish, Leigh Ann Simmons, Nneze Nwankwo, Karen Scherr, Mariana Da Costa, Elaine Sang, Camila Sanders, Courtney Swinkels, Norma Garcia Ortiz, Herbert H Severson, Kathryn I Pollak
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of a Text-Based Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Intervention for Rural and Medically Underserved Communities.","authors":"Devon Noonan, Susan G Silva, Laura J Fish, Leigh Ann Simmons, Nneze Nwankwo, Karen Scherr, Mariana Da Costa, Elaine Sang, Camila Sanders, Courtney Swinkels, Norma Garcia Ortiz, Herbert H Severson, Kathryn I Pollak","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smokeless tobacco use remains prevalent in rural and medically underserved populations, leading to increased rates of tobacco-related cancers and chronic disease. While access to effective cessation programs is limited, text-based interventions may offer a delivery approach with broad reach. This two-armed randomized control trial (RCT) assessed the efficacy of #EnufSnuff.TXT, a text-based smokeless tobacco cessation intervention, in rural and medically underserved communities.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>We conducted a two-arm RCT assessing #EnufSnuff.TXT, a text-based scheduled reduction intervention paired with text-based cessation support messages compared with the modified Enough Snuff intervention comprised of a cessation education booklet and bi-weekly motivational text messages. We recruited participants via social media and surveyed participants at 3 and 6 months post-randomization. The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited and randomized 532 participants. At 3 months post-randomization, the quit rate was significantly higher in #EnufSnuff.TXT arm compared to the Enough Snuff arm for intent-to-treat (ITT) cases (29.2% vs. 19.0%, odd ratios [OR] = 1.75, p = .0066). The quit rate at 6 months post-randomization remained higher in #EnufSNuff.TXT compared to Enough Snuff for ITT cases (23.1% vs. 20.9%, OR = 1.14, p = .5384), although no longer significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first large-scale text-based cessation clinical trial for individuals in underserved areas who use smokeless tobacco. The #EnufSnuff.TXT intervention performed better in the short term; however, both interventions yielded similar quit rates at 6 months post-randomization. Future research should focus on improving long-term abstinence in the #EnufSNuff.TXT intervention.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Text-based cessation approaches have the potential to increase access to cessation interventions in rural and medically underserved areas and reduce tobacco-related chronic disease morbidity and mortality. Our study shows short-term efficacy from the first-ever randomized controlled trial of a smokeless tobacco cessation intervention, #EnufSnuff.TXT, for rural and medically underserved residents in the United States. Our #EnufSnuff.TXT Intervention offers a scalable solution to reach and provide much-needed access to cessation interventions in medically underserved, rural communities in the United States. This work provides the foundation for further inquiry on augmented text-based approaches to increase cessation in this at-risk group.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>A text-based Reduction Intervention for Smokeless Tobacco Cessation, NCT04315506.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"132-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Smokeless tobacco use remains prevalent in rural and medically underserved populations, leading to increased rates of tobacco-related cancers and chronic disease. While access to effective cessation programs is limited, text-based interventions may offer a delivery approach with broad reach. This two-armed randomized control trial (RCT) assessed the efficacy of #EnufSnuff.TXT, a text-based smokeless tobacco cessation intervention, in rural and medically underserved communities.

Aims and methods: We conducted a two-arm RCT assessing #EnufSnuff.TXT, a text-based scheduled reduction intervention paired with text-based cessation support messages compared with the modified Enough Snuff intervention comprised of a cessation education booklet and bi-weekly motivational text messages. We recruited participants via social media and surveyed participants at 3 and 6 months post-randomization. The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months.

Results: We recruited and randomized 532 participants. At 3 months post-randomization, the quit rate was significantly higher in #EnufSnuff.TXT arm compared to the Enough Snuff arm for intent-to-treat (ITT) cases (29.2% vs. 19.0%, odd ratios [OR] = 1.75, p = .0066). The quit rate at 6 months post-randomization remained higher in #EnufSNuff.TXT compared to Enough Snuff for ITT cases (23.1% vs. 20.9%, OR = 1.14, p = .5384), although no longer significantly different.

Conclusions: This is the first large-scale text-based cessation clinical trial for individuals in underserved areas who use smokeless tobacco. The #EnufSnuff.TXT intervention performed better in the short term; however, both interventions yielded similar quit rates at 6 months post-randomization. Future research should focus on improving long-term abstinence in the #EnufSNuff.TXT intervention.

Implications: Text-based cessation approaches have the potential to increase access to cessation interventions in rural and medically underserved areas and reduce tobacco-related chronic disease morbidity and mortality. Our study shows short-term efficacy from the first-ever randomized controlled trial of a smokeless tobacco cessation intervention, #EnufSnuff.TXT, for rural and medically underserved residents in the United States. Our #EnufSnuff.TXT Intervention offers a scalable solution to reach and provide much-needed access to cessation interventions in medically underserved, rural communities in the United States. This work provides the foundation for further inquiry on augmented text-based approaches to increase cessation in this at-risk group.

Clinical trials registration: A text-based Reduction Intervention for Smokeless Tobacco Cessation, NCT04315506.

针对农村和医疗服务不足社区的基于文本的无烟烟草戒烟干预随机对照试验。
导言:无烟烟草的使用在农村和医疗服务不足的人群中仍然很普遍,导致与烟草相关的癌症和慢性病发病率上升。虽然获得有效戒烟计划的途径有限,但基于文本的干预措施可以提供一种覆盖面广的方法。这项双臂随机对照试验(RCT)评估了#EnufSnuff.TXT(一种基于文本的无烟戒烟干预措施)在农村和医疗服务不足社区的疗效:我们进行了一项双臂 RCT,评估了 #EnufSnuff.TXT,这是一种基于文本的计划减少干预措施,与基于文本的戒烟支持信息搭配使用,并与由戒烟教育手册和每两周一次的激励性文本信息组成的改良版 Enough Snuff 干预措施进行比较。我们通过社交媒体招募参与者,并在随机分配后的三个月和六个月对参与者进行了调查。主要结果是6个月时自我报告的7天点戒断率:我们招募并随机分配了 532 名参与者。随机后三个月,在意向治疗(ITT)病例中,#EnufSnuff.TXT 组的戒烟率明显高于 Enough Snuff 组(29.2% vs 19.0%,OR=1.75,p=0.0066)。随机化后六个月,#EnufSNuff.TXT 与 Enough Snuff 相比,ITT 病例的戒烟率仍然更高(23.1% vs 20.9%,OR=1.14,p=0.5384),但不再有显著差异:这是首个针对服务不足地区使用无烟烟草者的大规模基于文本的戒烟临床试验。#EnufSnuff.TXT干预的短期效果更好,但两种干预在随机化后6个月的戒烟率相似。未来的研究应侧重于提高#EnufSnuff.TXT干预的长期戒烟率:基于文本的戒烟方法有可能增加农村和医疗服务不足地区获得戒烟干预的机会,并降低与烟草相关的慢性病发病率和死亡率。我们的研究显示,首次针对美国农村和医疗服务不足地区居民的无烟烟草戒烟干预随机对照试验#EnufSnuff.TXT具有短期疗效。我们的#EnufSnuff.TXT干预措施提供了一个可扩展的解决方案,可为美国医疗服务不足的农村社区提供急需的戒烟干预措施。这项工作为进一步研究基于文本的增强方法以提高这一高风险群体的戒烟率奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信