A Systematic Review of Predictors of Vaping Cessation Among Young People.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anasua Kundu, Siddharth Seth, Daniel Felsky, Theo J Moraes, Peter Selby, Michael Chaiton
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Predictors of Vaping Cessation Among Young People.","authors":"Anasua Kundu, Siddharth Seth, Daniel Felsky, Theo J Moraes, Peter Selby, Michael Chaiton","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Understanding the factors influencing vaping cessation among young people is crucial for targeted interventions. This review aimed to summarize the individual and environmental factors that predict vaping cessation-related behaviors in the young population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched five databases for studies investigating predictors of vaping cessation behaviors among young people aged 10-35 years. Studies that examined predictors of cessation of cigarettes, other tobacco products, cannabis vaping, and studies evaluating efficacy of cessation interventions were excluded. Quality in Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 24 studies analyzing predictors of intention to quit vaping (n = 15), quit attempts (n = 11), and vaping abstinence (n = 7). Most studies had low risk of bias, except for study attrition. We identified 107 predictors and grouped them into \"probable,\" \"possible,\" \"insufficient evidence,\" \"probably unrelated,\" and \"inconsistent direction\" categories. For \"probable\" predictors, we found 11 for intention to quit, eight for quit attempts and five for vaping abstinence. Overall, harm perception of vaping, current other tobacco products use, frequency of use, and level of nicotine dependence were common \"probable\" predictors across three outcomes, with low harm perception of vaping, dual use, and poly tobacco use associated with decreased intention to quit and quit attempts in younger population (~10-19 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictive modeling studies investigating vaping cessation-related behaviors among young people are still limited. Future research should specifically study the natural history of vaping in youth in different jurisdictions, populations, and age groups to expand our knowledge in this area.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>We identified and categorized predictors of intention to quit vaping, quit attempts, and vaping abstinence among young people. While the \"probable\" predictors can inform public health and policymakers to plan targeted vaping cessation programs for high-risk populations, raising public harm perception of vaping and encouraging to quit other tobacco products might increase intention to quit and quit attempts among younger population. However, the \"possible,\" \"insufficient evidence\" and \"inconsistent direction\" predictors need further testing by future prospective longitudinal research. Additionally, we emphasized the significance of appropriate study designs, conducting research across various jurisdictions, and different population groups to obtain comprehensive insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Understanding the factors influencing vaping cessation among young people is crucial for targeted interventions. This review aimed to summarize the individual and environmental factors that predict vaping cessation-related behaviors in the young population.

Methods: We systematically searched five databases for studies investigating predictors of vaping cessation behaviors among young people aged 10-35 years. Studies that examined predictors of cessation of cigarettes, other tobacco products, cannabis vaping, and studies evaluating efficacy of cessation interventions were excluded. Quality in Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias.

Results: We found 24 studies analyzing predictors of intention to quit vaping (n = 15), quit attempts (n = 11), and vaping abstinence (n = 7). Most studies had low risk of bias, except for study attrition. We identified 107 predictors and grouped them into "probable," "possible," "insufficient evidence," "probably unrelated," and "inconsistent direction" categories. For "probable" predictors, we found 11 for intention to quit, eight for quit attempts and five for vaping abstinence. Overall, harm perception of vaping, current other tobacco products use, frequency of use, and level of nicotine dependence were common "probable" predictors across three outcomes, with low harm perception of vaping, dual use, and poly tobacco use associated with decreased intention to quit and quit attempts in younger population (~10-19 years).

Conclusions: Predictive modeling studies investigating vaping cessation-related behaviors among young people are still limited. Future research should specifically study the natural history of vaping in youth in different jurisdictions, populations, and age groups to expand our knowledge in this area.

Implications: We identified and categorized predictors of intention to quit vaping, quit attempts, and vaping abstinence among young people. While the "probable" predictors can inform public health and policymakers to plan targeted vaping cessation programs for high-risk populations, raising public harm perception of vaping and encouraging to quit other tobacco products might increase intention to quit and quit attempts among younger population. However, the "possible," "insufficient evidence" and "inconsistent direction" predictors need further testing by future prospective longitudinal research. Additionally, we emphasized the significance of appropriate study designs, conducting research across various jurisdictions, and different population groups to obtain comprehensive insights.

对年轻人停止吸食电子烟的预测因素进行系统性审查。
导言:了解影响年轻人戒烟的因素对于采取有针对性的干预措施至关重要。本综述旨在总结预测青少年人群中与停止吸烟相关行为的个人和环境因素:我们在五个数据库中系统地搜索了调查 10-35 岁青少年停止吸烟行为预测因素的研究。排除了研究戒除香烟、其他烟草制品、吸食大麻的预测因素的研究,以及评估戒烟干预效果的研究。采用预后研究质量工具评估偏倚风险:我们发现了 24 项研究,分析了戒烟意向(15 项)、戒烟尝试(11 项)和禁烟(7 项)的预测因素。除研究减员外,大多数研究的偏倚风险较低。我们确定了 107 个预测因子,并将其分为 "可能"、"可能"、"证据不足"、"可能无关 "和 "方向不一致 "等类别。在 "可能 "的预测因子中,我们发现有 11 个预测因子与戒烟意向有关,8 个预测因子与戒烟尝试有关,5 个预测因子与禁烟有关。总体而言,对吸烟、目前使用其他烟草制品、使用频率和尼古丁依赖程度的危害感知是三种结果中常见的 "可能 "预测因素,对吸烟、双重使用和多种烟草制品使用的危害感知较低与戒烟意愿和戒烟尝试的减少有关:调查年轻人吸烟戒烟相关行为的预测模型研究仍然有限。未来的研究应该专门研究不同辖区、不同人群和不同年龄段的青少年吸食电子烟的自然史,以扩展我们在这一领域的知识:我们确定了青少年戒烟意向、戒烟尝试和禁烟的预测因素并对其进行了分类。虽然 "可能 "的预测因素可以为公共卫生和政策制定者提供信息,帮助他们为高风险人群规划有针对性的停止吸食电子烟计划,但提高公众对吸食电子烟危害的认识并鼓励他们戒除其他烟草制品可能会增加年轻人的戒烟意向和戒烟尝试。然而,"可能"、"证据不足 "和 "方向不一致 "的预测因素还需要未来的前瞻性纵向研究来进一步检验。此外,我们还强调了适当的研究设计、在不同地区和不同人群中开展研究以获得全面见解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信