A Characterization of Central Auditory Processing in Parkinson's Disease.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, Erick I Correa-Medina, Katia Padilla-Bustos, Diana Paulina Romero Terán, Ana Jimena Hernández-Medrano, Gloria Itzel Cerda-Hernández, Amin Cervantes-Arriaga, Mayela Rodríguez-Violante, Frederick J Gallun, Aaron R Seitz, Rodolfo Solís-Vivanco
{"title":"A Characterization of Central Auditory Processing in Parkinson's Disease.","authors":"E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera, Erick I Correa-Medina, Katia Padilla-Bustos, Diana Paulina Romero Terán, Ana Jimena Hernández-Medrano, Gloria Itzel Cerda-Hernández, Amin Cervantes-Arriaga, Mayela Rodríguez-Violante, Frederick J Gallun, Aaron R Seitz, Rodolfo Solís-Vivanco","doi":"10.3233/JPD-230458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research indicates that people with Parkinson's disease (PwPs) may experience challenges in both peripheral and central auditory processing, although findings are inconsistent across studies. Due to the diversity of auditory measures used, there is a need for standardized, replicable hearing assessments to clarify which aspects of audition are impacted in PWPs and whether they are linked to motor and non-motor symptoms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize auditory processes and their possible alteration in PwPs. To address this, we collected a comprehensive set of standardized measures of audition using PART, a digital testing platform designed to facilitate replication. Additionally, we examined the relationship between auditory, cognitive, and clinical variables in PwPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 44 PwPs and 54 age and education matched healthy controls. Assessments included detection of diotic and dichotic frequency modulation, temporal gaps, spectro-temporal broad-band modulation, and speech-on-speech masking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no statistically significant differences in auditory processing measures between PwPs and the comparison group (ps > 0.07). In PwPs, an auditory processing composite score showed significant medium size correlations with cognitive measures (0.39 < r<0.41, ps < 0.02) and clinical variables of motor symptom severity, quality of life, depression, and caretaker burden (0.33 < r<0.52, ps < 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While larger datasets are needed to clarify whether PwPs experience more auditory difficulties than healthy controls, our results underscore the importance of considering auditory processing on the symptomatic spectrum of Parkinson's disease using standardized replicable methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"999-1013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-230458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research indicates that people with Parkinson's disease (PwPs) may experience challenges in both peripheral and central auditory processing, although findings are inconsistent across studies. Due to the diversity of auditory measures used, there is a need for standardized, replicable hearing assessments to clarify which aspects of audition are impacted in PWPs and whether they are linked to motor and non-motor symptoms.

Objective: To characterize auditory processes and their possible alteration in PwPs. To address this, we collected a comprehensive set of standardized measures of audition using PART, a digital testing platform designed to facilitate replication. Additionally, we examined the relationship between auditory, cognitive, and clinical variables in PwPs.

Methods: We included 44 PwPs and 54 age and education matched healthy controls. Assessments included detection of diotic and dichotic frequency modulation, temporal gaps, spectro-temporal broad-band modulation, and speech-on-speech masking.

Results: We found no statistically significant differences in auditory processing measures between PwPs and the comparison group (ps > 0.07). In PwPs, an auditory processing composite score showed significant medium size correlations with cognitive measures (0.39 < r<0.41, ps < 0.02) and clinical variables of motor symptom severity, quality of life, depression, and caretaker burden (0.33 < r<0.52, ps < 0.03).

Conclusions: While larger datasets are needed to clarify whether PwPs experience more auditory difficulties than healthy controls, our results underscore the importance of considering auditory processing on the symptomatic spectrum of Parkinson's disease using standardized replicable methodologies.

帕金森病患者的中枢听觉处理特征。
背景:研究表明,帕金森病患者(PwPs)可能在外周和中枢听觉处理方面遇到困难,但不同研究的结果并不一致。由于所使用的听觉测量方法多种多样,因此需要进行标准化、可复制的听力评估,以明确帕金森病患者听觉的哪些方面受到影响,以及它们是否与运动和非运动症状有关:目的:描述残疾人的听觉过程及其可能的改变。为此,我们使用 PART 收集了一套全面的标准化听觉测量方法,PART 是一个数字测试平台,旨在方便复制。此外,我们还研究了 PwPs 中听觉、认知和临床变量之间的关系:我们纳入了 44 名 PwPs 和 54 名年龄和教育程度相匹配的健康对照者。评估内容包括检测二分和二分频率调制、时间间隙、频谱-时间宽带调制以及语音掩蔽:我们发现,在听觉处理方面,PwPs 和对比组之间没有明显的统计学差异(Ps > 0.07)。在 PwPs 中,听觉处理综合得分与认知测量结果呈显著的中等相关性(0.39 < r结论:虽然还需要更大的数据集来澄清帕金森病患者是否比健康对照组患者经历更多的听觉困难,但我们的结果强调了使用标准化的可复制方法来考虑帕金森病症状谱中听觉处理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信