Peri-operative zoledronic acid attenuates peri-prosthetic osteolysis in a rat model of cemented knee replacement

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kenneth A. Mann, Mark A. Miller, Sachin A. Gandhi, Jace E. Kusler, Megan E. Tatusko, Amy E. Biggs, Megan E. Oest
{"title":"Peri-operative zoledronic acid attenuates peri-prosthetic osteolysis in a rat model of cemented knee replacement","authors":"Kenneth A. Mann,&nbsp;Mark A. Miller,&nbsp;Sachin A. Gandhi,&nbsp;Jace E. Kusler,&nbsp;Megan E. Tatusko,&nbsp;Amy E. Biggs,&nbsp;Megan E. Oest","doi":"10.1002/jor.25941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Progressive osteolysis can occur at the cement–bone interface of joint replacements and the associated loss of fixation can lead to clinical loosening. We previously developed a rat hemiarthroplasty model that exhibited progressive loss of fixation with the development of cement–bone gaps under the tibial tray that mimicked patterns found in human arthroplasty retrievals. Here we explored the ability of a bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid, ZA) to attenuate cement–bone osteolysis and maintain implant stability. Sprague-Dawley rats (<i>n</i> = 59) received a poly(methylmethacrylate) cemented tibial component and were followed for up to 12 weeks. Treatment groups included peri-operative administration of ZA (ZA group), administration of ZA at 6 weeks postop (late ZA group), or vehicle (Veh group). There was a 60% reduction in the rate of cement–bone gap formation for the ZA group (0.15 mm<sup>3</sup>/week) compared to Veh group (0.38 mm<sup>3</sup>/week, <i>p</i> = 0.016). Late ZA prevented further progression of gap formation but did not reverse bone loss to the level achieved in the ZA group. Micromotion from five times body weight toggle loading was positively correlated with cement–bone gap volume (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and negatively correlated with the amount of cement in the metaphysis (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Reduced new bone formation and enduring nonviable bone in the epiphysis for the ZA group were found. This suggests that low bone turnover in the epiphysis may suppress the early catabolic response due to implantation, thereby maintaining better fixation in the epiphysis. This preclinical model presents compelling supporting data documenting improved maintenance of the cement–bone fixation with the use of peri-operative bisphosphonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"42 12","pages":"2693-2704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Progressive osteolysis can occur at the cement–bone interface of joint replacements and the associated loss of fixation can lead to clinical loosening. We previously developed a rat hemiarthroplasty model that exhibited progressive loss of fixation with the development of cement–bone gaps under the tibial tray that mimicked patterns found in human arthroplasty retrievals. Here we explored the ability of a bisphosphonate (zoledronic acid, ZA) to attenuate cement–bone osteolysis and maintain implant stability. Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 59) received a poly(methylmethacrylate) cemented tibial component and were followed for up to 12 weeks. Treatment groups included peri-operative administration of ZA (ZA group), administration of ZA at 6 weeks postop (late ZA group), or vehicle (Veh group). There was a 60% reduction in the rate of cement–bone gap formation for the ZA group (0.15 mm3/week) compared to Veh group (0.38 mm3/week, p = 0.016). Late ZA prevented further progression of gap formation but did not reverse bone loss to the level achieved in the ZA group. Micromotion from five times body weight toggle loading was positively correlated with cement–bone gap volume (p = 0.009) and negatively correlated with the amount of cement in the metaphysis (p = 0.005). Reduced new bone formation and enduring nonviable bone in the epiphysis for the ZA group were found. This suggests that low bone turnover in the epiphysis may suppress the early catabolic response due to implantation, thereby maintaining better fixation in the epiphysis. This preclinical model presents compelling supporting data documenting improved maintenance of the cement–bone fixation with the use of peri-operative bisphosphonates.

Abstract Image

在大鼠骨水泥膝关节置换模型中,围手术期唑来膦酸可减轻假体周围骨溶解。
关节置换的骨水泥-骨界面会发生渐进性骨溶解,相关的固定丧失会导致临床松动。我们之前开发了一种大鼠半关节置换模型,该模型表现出渐进性的固定丧失,在胫骨托盘下出现骨水泥-骨间隙,这与人类关节置换取骨时发现的模式相似。在此,我们探讨了双膦酸盐(唑来膦酸,ZA)减轻骨水泥溶骨并保持植入物稳定性的能力。Sprague-Dawley大鼠(n = 59)接受了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(poly(methylmethacrylate))骨水泥胫骨组件,并接受了长达12周的随访。治疗组包括围手术期施用ZA(ZA组)、术后6周施用ZA(晚期ZA组)或药物(Veh组)。ZA组的骨水泥-骨间隙形成率(0.15 mm3/周)比Veh组(0.38 mm3/周,p = 0.016)降低了60%。晚期ZA阻止了间隙形成的进一步发展,但并没有将骨质流失逆转到ZA组所达到的水平。五倍体重拨动加载产生的微动与骨水泥-骨间隙量呈正相关(p = 0.009),与干骺端骨水泥量呈负相关(p = 0.005)。研究发现,ZA 组新骨形成减少,骨骺中无法存活的骨量持续增加。这表明,骨骺中的低骨周转可抑制因植入而引起的早期分解代谢反应,从而在骨骺中保持更好的固定。该临床前模型提供了令人信服的支持数据,证明围手术期使用双膦酸盐可改善骨水泥固定的维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信