Resilience-based decision support system for installing standalone solar energy systems to improve disaster resilience of rural communities

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Hamed Hafeznia , Božidar Stojadinović
{"title":"Resilience-based decision support system for installing standalone solar energy systems to improve disaster resilience of rural communities","authors":"Hamed Hafeznia ,&nbsp;Božidar Stojadinović","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A potential solution to improve electricity access is to provide rural communities with a stable and resilient electric power supply from reliable and sustainable energy sources. Considering resilience in rural electrification planning can bring about longer techno-economic viability of rural power supply projects. For this purpose, this paper introduces ResQ-RDSS, a Resilience Quantification-based Regional Decision Support System. The novelty of ResQ-RDSS is integrating resilience quantification, optimization, and multi-hazard risk assessment into multi-criteria decision-making. The ResQ-RDSS aims to formulate a resilient electrification solution most suitable for each village to enhance the availability of electricity access for rural communities. ResQ-RDSS comprises four modules: Spatial Techno-Economic Assessment (STEA), Earthquake-induced Risk Assessment (ERA), Flood-induced Risk Assessment (FRA), and Decision Maker (DM). The STEA module considers six geospatial criteria to appraise the techno-economic suitability of villages for installing off-grid solar PV systems. This module classifies rural communities according to their suitability. The ERA and FRA modules quantify the resilience of the rural power transmission network to earthquake and flood scenarios, respectively, and classify the rural communities into two groups using multi-hazard disaster resilience metrics and decision-making parameters defined for the probabilistic resilience assessment. Finally, the DM module facilitates the selection of a resilient electrification strategy, installing off-grid PV systems or connecting to the power grid, for each rural community in the region of interest. The 158 rural settlements in Birjand County, Iran, exposed to earthquake and flood risks were selected for a case study to demonstrate the ResQ-RDSS's ability to help devise resilient regional electrification strategies. In this case study, the suitability of villages for installing solar PV systems and the resilience of rural power supply against natural hazards were evaluated and accordingly, possible resilient solutions for electrifying each village were compared and selected. The STEA, ERA, and FRA modules, respectively, classify 38, 53, and 55 villages (out of 158) for off-grid solar PV installation. Depending on the strategy selected by the decision-maker, ResQ-RDSS identifies between 13.3 % and 48.1 % of villages in the case study as suitable for deploying off-grid PV systems. The resilient electrification strategy can be selected by considering various factors, including budget constraints, stakeholders' interests, the local conditions of rural areas, policymakers' opinions, regional hazard risk assessment reports, and future development plans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101489"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24001962/pdfft?md5=e89e7e35e0271fd6d5d5e9d73634f104&pid=1-s2.0-S2211467X24001962-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24001962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A potential solution to improve electricity access is to provide rural communities with a stable and resilient electric power supply from reliable and sustainable energy sources. Considering resilience in rural electrification planning can bring about longer techno-economic viability of rural power supply projects. For this purpose, this paper introduces ResQ-RDSS, a Resilience Quantification-based Regional Decision Support System. The novelty of ResQ-RDSS is integrating resilience quantification, optimization, and multi-hazard risk assessment into multi-criteria decision-making. The ResQ-RDSS aims to formulate a resilient electrification solution most suitable for each village to enhance the availability of electricity access for rural communities. ResQ-RDSS comprises four modules: Spatial Techno-Economic Assessment (STEA), Earthquake-induced Risk Assessment (ERA), Flood-induced Risk Assessment (FRA), and Decision Maker (DM). The STEA module considers six geospatial criteria to appraise the techno-economic suitability of villages for installing off-grid solar PV systems. This module classifies rural communities according to their suitability. The ERA and FRA modules quantify the resilience of the rural power transmission network to earthquake and flood scenarios, respectively, and classify the rural communities into two groups using multi-hazard disaster resilience metrics and decision-making parameters defined for the probabilistic resilience assessment. Finally, the DM module facilitates the selection of a resilient electrification strategy, installing off-grid PV systems or connecting to the power grid, for each rural community in the region of interest. The 158 rural settlements in Birjand County, Iran, exposed to earthquake and flood risks were selected for a case study to demonstrate the ResQ-RDSS's ability to help devise resilient regional electrification strategies. In this case study, the suitability of villages for installing solar PV systems and the resilience of rural power supply against natural hazards were evaluated and accordingly, possible resilient solutions for electrifying each village were compared and selected. The STEA, ERA, and FRA modules, respectively, classify 38, 53, and 55 villages (out of 158) for off-grid solar PV installation. Depending on the strategy selected by the decision-maker, ResQ-RDSS identifies between 13.3 % and 48.1 % of villages in the case study as suitable for deploying off-grid PV systems. The resilient electrification strategy can be selected by considering various factors, including budget constraints, stakeholders' interests, the local conditions of rural areas, policymakers' opinions, regional hazard risk assessment reports, and future development plans.

基于抗灾能力的决策支持系统,用于安装独立太阳能系统以提高农村社区的抗灾能力
改善电力供应的一个潜在解决方案是为农村社区提供来自可靠和可持续能源的稳定而有弹性的电力供应。在农村电气化规划中考虑抗灾能力可以延长农村供电项目的技术经济可行性。为此,本文介绍了基于复原力量化的区域决策支持系统 ResQ-RDSS。ResQ-RDSS 的新颖之处在于将复原力量化、优化和多灾害风险评估整合到多标准决策中。ResQ-RDSS 旨在制定最适合每个村庄的弹性电气化解决方案,以提高农村社区的用电普及率。ResQ-RDSS 包括四个模块:空间技术经济评估 (STEA)、地震诱发风险评估 (ERA)、洪水诱发风险评估 (FRA) 和决策者 (DM)。STEA 模块考虑了六个地理空间标准,以评估村庄安装离网太阳能光伏系统的技术经济适宜性。该模块根据适宜性对农村社区进行分类。ERA 和 FRA 模块分别量化了农村输电网络对地震和洪水的抗灾能力,并使用多灾害抗灾能力指标和为概率抗灾能力评估定义的决策参数将农村社区分为两组。最后,DM 模块有助于为相关地区的每个农村社区选择一种具有抗灾能力的电气化战略,即安装离网光伏系统或接入电网。案例研究选择了伊朗比尔詹德县面临地震和洪水风险的 158 个农村居民点,以展示 ResQ-RDSS 帮助制定具有抗灾能力的区域电气化战略的能力。在该案例研究中,评估了各村庄安装太阳能光伏系统的适宜性以及农村电力供应抵御自然灾害的能力,并据此比较和选择了各村庄电气化的可行弹性解决方案。STEA 模块、ERA 模块和 FRA 模块分别将(158 个村庄中的)38 个、53 个和 55 个村庄划分为可安装离网太阳能光伏发电系统的村庄。根据决策者选择的策略,ResQ-RDSS 将案例研究中 13.3 % 到 48.1 % 的村庄确定为适合部署离网光伏系统的村庄。选择弹性电气化战略时可考虑各种因素,包括预算限制、利益相关者的利益、农村地区的当地条件、决策者的意见、地区灾害风险评估报告以及未来发展计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信