Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.2196/54810
Brittany Taylor, Mollie Hobensack, Stephanie Niño de Rivera, Yihong Zhao, Ruth Masterson Creber, Kenrick Cato
{"title":"Identifying Depression Through Machine Learning Analysis of Omics Data: Scoping Review.","authors":"Brittany Taylor, Mollie Hobensack, Stephanie Niño de Rivera, Yihong Zhao, Ruth Masterson Creber, Kenrick Cato","doi":"10.2196/54810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is one of the most common mental disorders that affects >300 million people worldwide. There is a shortage of providers trained in the provision of mental health care, and the nursing workforce is essential in filling this gap. The diagnosis of depression relies heavily on self-reported symptoms and clinical interviews, which are subject to implicit biases. The omics methods, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics, are novel methods for identifying the biological underpinnings of depression. Machine learning is used to analyze genomic data that includes large, heterogeneous, and multidimensional data sets.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to review the existing literature on machine learning methods for omics data analysis to identify individuals with depression, with the goal of providing insight into alternative objective and driven insights into the diagnostic process for depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Searches were conducted in 3 databases to identify relevant publications. A total of 3 independent researchers performed screening, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Critical appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screening process identified 15 relevant papers. The omics methods included genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, multiomics, and microbiomics, and machine learning methods included random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and artificial neural network.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this scoping review indicate that the omics methods had similar performance in identifying omics variants associated with depression. All machine learning methods performed well based on their performance metrics. When variants in omics data are associated with an increased risk of depression, the important next step is for clinicians, especially nurses, to assess individuals for symptoms of depression and provide a diagnosis and any necessary treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"7 ","pages":"e54810"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression is one of the most common mental disorders that affects >300 million people worldwide. There is a shortage of providers trained in the provision of mental health care, and the nursing workforce is essential in filling this gap. The diagnosis of depression relies heavily on self-reported symptoms and clinical interviews, which are subject to implicit biases. The omics methods, including genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics, are novel methods for identifying the biological underpinnings of depression. Machine learning is used to analyze genomic data that includes large, heterogeneous, and multidimensional data sets.

Objective: This scoping review aims to review the existing literature on machine learning methods for omics data analysis to identify individuals with depression, with the goal of providing insight into alternative objective and driven insights into the diagnostic process for depression.

Methods: This scoping review was reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Searches were conducted in 3 databases to identify relevant publications. A total of 3 independent researchers performed screening, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Critical appraisal was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.

Results: The screening process identified 15 relevant papers. The omics methods included genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, multiomics, and microbiomics, and machine learning methods included random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and artificial neural network.

Conclusions: The findings of this scoping review indicate that the omics methods had similar performance in identifying omics variants associated with depression. All machine learning methods performed well based on their performance metrics. When variants in omics data are associated with an increased risk of depression, the important next step is for clinicians, especially nurses, to assess individuals for symptoms of depression and provide a diagnosis and any necessary treatment.

通过 Omics 数据的机器学习分析识别抑郁症:范围审查。
背景:抑郁症是最常见的精神疾病之一,影响着全球 3 亿多人。在提供心理健康护理方面受过培训的医疗人员短缺,而护理人员队伍对于填补这一缺口至关重要。抑郁症的诊断在很大程度上依赖于自我报告的症状和临床访谈,而这是受隐性偏见影响的。包括基因组学、转录组学、表观基因组学和微生物组学在内的全局组学方法是确定抑郁症生物学基础的新方法。机器学习用于分析包括大型、异构和多维数据集在内的基因组数据:本范围综述旨在综述现有的有关机器学习方法的文献,这些方法用于 omics 数据分析,以识别抑郁症患者,目的是为抑郁症的诊断过程提供其他客观和有驱动力的见解:本范围界定综述按照 PRISMA-ScR(《系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目》扩展版,用于范围界定综述)指南进行报告。我们在 3 个数据库中进行了搜索,以确定相关出版物。共有 3 位独立研究人员进行了筛选,并在协商一致的基础上解决了差异。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的分析性横断面研究批判性评价核对表进行批判性评价:结果:筛选过程确定了 15 篇相关论文。omics方法包括基因组学、转录组学、表观基因组学、多组学和微生物组学,机器学习方法包括随机森林、支持向量机、k-近邻和人工神经网络:本范围综述的研究结果表明,在识别与抑郁症相关的组学变异方面,组学方法具有相似的性能。根据其性能指标,所有机器学习方法都表现良好。当 omics 数据中的变异与抑郁症风险增加有关时,临床医生(尤其是护士)下一步的重要工作就是评估个人的抑郁症状,并提供诊断和必要的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信