Pharmacist initiated interventions using RxChange message communication with prescribers for electronic prescriptions: A retrospective descriptive study

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jun Gong, Yifan Zheng, Corey A. Lester
{"title":"Pharmacist initiated interventions using RxChange message communication with prescribers for electronic prescriptions: A retrospective descriptive study","authors":"Jun Gong,&nbsp;Yifan Zheng,&nbsp;Corey A. Lester","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2024.102188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>RxChange messages improve patient medication management by enhancing pharmacist-prescriber communication, but their usage patterns in the United States are not well-documented.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine intervention characteristics by pharmacists and prescribers using RxChange messages.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of electronic prescription and RxChange messages from 2022 to 2023, using data from Surescripts, LLC, was conducted. This included NewRx messages and RxChange Responses, categorized by 7 RxChange use cases and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical level 4 medication classes. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study analyzed 1,361,528 RxChange messages. Therapeutic interchange was the predominant use case (76.14%). Direct approvals accounted for 10.44% of requests, approvals with changes for 42.55%, and denials for 47.01%. Script clarification had the highest approval rate (64.21%), while prior authorization faced the most frequent denials (73.38%). The top denial reason was \"Request addressed through alternate methods such as phone or fax (41.50%).” The most frequent drug classes observed in the data were selective beta-2 adrenoreceptor agonists, extended-spectrum penicillins, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues. Time from new e-prescription issuance to RxChange request submission was longer than from request to response, with a significant statistical difference (median 1.57 vs 0.27 days, <em>P</em>-value &lt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlights interventions pharmacists make using RxChange with electronic prescriptions to improve patient care and medication safety. It underlined the need for improved RxChange message content and data on the effectiveness of RxChange messages in improving medication use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 102188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319124002085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

RxChange messages improve patient medication management by enhancing pharmacist-prescriber communication, but their usage patterns in the United States are not well-documented.

Objective

To determine intervention characteristics by pharmacists and prescribers using RxChange messages.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of electronic prescription and RxChange messages from 2022 to 2023, using data from Surescripts, LLC, was conducted. This included NewRx messages and RxChange Responses, categorized by 7 RxChange use cases and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical level 4 medication classes. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

The study analyzed 1,361,528 RxChange messages. Therapeutic interchange was the predominant use case (76.14%). Direct approvals accounted for 10.44% of requests, approvals with changes for 42.55%, and denials for 47.01%. Script clarification had the highest approval rate (64.21%), while prior authorization faced the most frequent denials (73.38%). The top denial reason was "Request addressed through alternate methods such as phone or fax (41.50%).” The most frequent drug classes observed in the data were selective beta-2 adrenoreceptor agonists, extended-spectrum penicillins, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues. Time from new e-prescription issuance to RxChange request submission was longer than from request to response, with a significant statistical difference (median 1.57 vs 0.27 days, P-value < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study highlights interventions pharmacists make using RxChange with electronic prescriptions to improve patient care and medication safety. It underlined the need for improved RxChange message content and data on the effectiveness of RxChange messages in improving medication use.

药剂师利用 RxChange 信息与处方者沟通,对电子处方进行干预:回顾性描述研究。
背景:改变药方 "信息通过加强药剂师与处方医生之间的沟通来改善患者的用药管理,但其在美国的使用模式并没有得到很好的记录:目的:确定药剂师和处方者使用 RxChange 信息的干预特点:利用 Surescripts, LLC 提供的数据,对 2022 年和 2023 年的电子处方和 RxChange 信息进行了回顾性分析。其中包括新处方信息和处方变更回复,并按照七种处方变更使用案例和解剖治疗化学 4 级药物类别进行了分类。统计分析使用了描述性统计和非参数检验:研究分析了 1,361,528 条 RxChange 信息。治疗交换是最主要的使用情况(76.14%)。直接批准的请求占 10.44%,带更改的批准占 42.55%,拒绝占 47.01%。脚本澄清的批准率最高(64.21%),而事先授权的拒绝率最高(73.38%)。最常见的拒绝原因是 "要求通过电话或传真等其他方式解决"(41.50%)。数据中最常见的药物类别是选择性 beta-2 肾上腺素受体激动剂、广谱青霉素类、选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽 1 类似物。从新的电子处方签发到提交 RxChange 申请的时间长于从申请到回复的时间,两者之间存在显著的统计学差异(中位数为 1.57 天 vs 0.27 天,P 值 < 0.05):本研究强调了药剂师使用 RxChange 与电子处方进行干预,以改善患者护理和用药安全。它强调了改进 RxChange 信息内容的必要性,以及 RxChange 信息在改善药物使用方面的有效性数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
336
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Pharmacists Association is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), providing information on pharmaceutical care, drug therapy, diseases and other health issues, trends in pharmacy practice and therapeutics, informed opinion, and original research. JAPhA publishes original research, reviews, experiences, and opinion articles that link science to contemporary pharmacy practice to improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信