Whole Day Workload: Evaluation of a New Outcome Measure in Occupational Therapy for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Raymond Hernandez, Stefan Schneider, Haomiao Jin, Claire Hoogendoorn, Pey-Jiuan Lee, Loree Pham, Elizabeth A Pyatak
{"title":"Whole Day Workload: Evaluation of a New Outcome Measure in Occupational Therapy for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Raymond Hernandez, Stefan Schneider, Haomiao Jin, Claire Hoogendoorn, Pey-Jiuan Lee, Loree Pham, Elizabeth A Pyatak","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Typical whole day workload is a metric with potential relevance to the occupational balance and well-being of individuals with chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the reliability and validity of using multiple daily NASA Task Load Index measures (whole day TLX) as an indicator of typical whole day workload experienced by adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants with T1D completed cross-sectional measures and 2 wk of ecological momentary assessments (EMA) and daily diaries. Reliability was assessed across subgroups (e.g., workers vs. nonworkers); validity was evaluated with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and with tests of convergent and divergent validity with patient-reported outcomes and blood glucose measures.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three outpatient endocrinology clinics in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data from 164 U.S. adults with T1D (42% Latino, 30% White).</p><p><strong>Outcomes and measures: </strong>Measures used included the whole day TLX (assessed via 2 wk of daily diaries), time in target blood glucose range (assessed with a continuous glucose monitor), illness intrusiveness (measured cross-sectionally), and stress (measured cross-sectionally and with EMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Number of days required for at least 0.70 reliability of the average whole day TLX ranged between 2 and 6 days depending on the subgroup. Results supported convergent and divergent validity of the average of the whole day TLX, including associations with average stress (r = .63, p < .001) and time in target blood glucose range (r = -.25, p = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The whole day TLX was a reliable and valid indicator of typical whole day workload. Plain-Language Summary: The health management responsibilities for Type 1 diabetes can be extremely burdensome. When these responsibilities are experienced, in addition to duties such as work and caregiving, the totality of demands experienced (i.e., whole day workload) can create further issues, such as unhealthy physiological changes and interference with self-care. We tested the psychometric properties of a measurement tool that assesses the typical level of workload people experience. This measure, referred to as the NASA Task Load Index (whole day TLX), was found to be a reliable and valid indicator of typical whole day workload. Occupational therapists may use the whole day TLX to track progress in interventions focused on reducing clients' whole day workload exposure to promote their health and well-being. Occupational therapists' expertise in areas such as activity analysis, task adaptation, and energy conservation makes them especially well-suited to intervene on whole day workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"78 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Typical whole day workload is a metric with potential relevance to the occupational balance and well-being of individuals with chronic conditions.

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of using multiple daily NASA Task Load Index measures (whole day TLX) as an indicator of typical whole day workload experienced by adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Design: Participants with T1D completed cross-sectional measures and 2 wk of ecological momentary assessments (EMA) and daily diaries. Reliability was assessed across subgroups (e.g., workers vs. nonworkers); validity was evaluated with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and with tests of convergent and divergent validity with patient-reported outcomes and blood glucose measures.

Setting: Three outpatient endocrinology clinics in the United States.

Participants: Data from 164 U.S. adults with T1D (42% Latino, 30% White).

Outcomes and measures: Measures used included the whole day TLX (assessed via 2 wk of daily diaries), time in target blood glucose range (assessed with a continuous glucose monitor), illness intrusiveness (measured cross-sectionally), and stress (measured cross-sectionally and with EMA).

Results: Number of days required for at least 0.70 reliability of the average whole day TLX ranged between 2 and 6 days depending on the subgroup. Results supported convergent and divergent validity of the average of the whole day TLX, including associations with average stress (r = .63, p < .001) and time in target blood glucose range (r = -.25, p = .002).

Conclusions and relevance: The whole day TLX was a reliable and valid indicator of typical whole day workload. Plain-Language Summary: The health management responsibilities for Type 1 diabetes can be extremely burdensome. When these responsibilities are experienced, in addition to duties such as work and caregiving, the totality of demands experienced (i.e., whole day workload) can create further issues, such as unhealthy physiological changes and interference with self-care. We tested the psychometric properties of a measurement tool that assesses the typical level of workload people experience. This measure, referred to as the NASA Task Load Index (whole day TLX), was found to be a reliable and valid indicator of typical whole day workload. Occupational therapists may use the whole day TLX to track progress in interventions focused on reducing clients' whole day workload exposure to promote their health and well-being. Occupational therapists' expertise in areas such as activity analysis, task adaptation, and energy conservation makes them especially well-suited to intervene on whole day workload.

全天工作量:评估 1 型糖尿病成人职业疗法的新成果测量。
重要性:典型的全天工作量是一个与慢性病患者的职业平衡和福祉具有潜在相关性的指标:目的:研究使用多个日常 NASA 任务负荷指数(全天 TLX)作为 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成人典型全天工作量指标的可靠性和有效性:设计:1 型糖尿病患者完成横断面测量以及为期 2 周的生态瞬间评估 (EMA) 和每日日记。对不同亚组(如工作者与非工作者)的可靠性进行了评估;通过多层次确证因子分析以及与患者报告结果和血糖测量结果的聚合有效性和发散有效性测试,对有效性进行了评估:环境:美国三家内分泌学门诊:164 名患有 T1D 的美国成年人(42% 为拉丁裔,30% 为白人)的数据:测量指标包括全天 TLX(通过 2 周的每日日记进行评估)、目标血糖范围内的时间(通过连续血糖监测仪进行评估)、疾病侵扰性(横截面测量)和压力(横截面测量和 EMA 测量):全天平均 TLX 可靠性至少达到 0.70 所需的天数为 2 至 6 天,具体取决于分组。结果支持全天平均 TLX 的收敛性和发散性,包括与平均压力(r = .63,p < .001)和目标血糖范围内时间(r = -.25,p = .002)的相关性:全天 TLX 是全天典型工作量的可靠有效指标。通俗易懂的摘要:1 型糖尿病患者的健康管理责任可能非常繁重。在承担这些责任时,除了工作和护理等职责外,所经历的全部需求(即全天工作量)可能会产生更多问题,如不健康的生理变化和对自我护理的干扰。我们测试了一种测量工具的心理测量特性,该工具可评估人们经历的典型工作量水平。结果表明,这种被称为 NASA 任务负荷指数(全天 TLX)的测量方法是一种可靠有效的典型全天工作量指标。职业治疗师可以使用全天 TLX 来跟踪干预措施的进展情况,重点是减少客户的全天工作量,以促进他们的健康和幸福。职业治疗师在活动分析、任务适应和节能等领域的专业知识使他们特别适合对全天工作量进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信