Impact and visualization of scotomatic glare in central visual field perception

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Diana Hering , Frank M. Jakobs , Gunnar Ritt , Michael Henrichsen , Bettina Hohberger
{"title":"Impact and visualization of scotomatic glare in central visual field perception","authors":"Diana Hering ,&nbsp;Frank M. Jakobs ,&nbsp;Gunnar Ritt ,&nbsp;Michael Henrichsen ,&nbsp;Bettina Hohberger","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Strong monochromatic point light sources such as Light Emitting Diodes (LED) or Lasers have been increasingly used in recent decades. This also raises the risk of misuse resulting in glare phenomena and associated visual impairment. The objective of this prospective and partially blinded study was the visualization and characterization of glare-induced scotomas in visual field by dazzling with monochromatic point light sources in terms of disability and discomfort glare. Automated threshold perimetry under dazzling by LED exposure at three different wavelengths (470, 530 and 625 nm) and four different intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100%) was performed in 31 healthy subjects resulting in 434 visual field examinations. Visual disability was measured by sensitivity loss in the central 30°<!--> <!-->as compared to unexposed controls and visualized by reconstruction of mean visual fields for each group via backward-calculation. Psychological glare was assessed by subsequent questionnaire and evaluated based on the de Boer rating scale of discomfort. Increasing glare intensities resulted in a significant decrease in mean sensitivity for all wavelengths tested, paralleled by an increase of discomfort glare. The loss of sensitivity was scattered over all quadrants with accentuation of the corresponding mean exposure area. Reconstructed visual fields confirmed visual impairment in all quadrants at an extent of at least 30°. We conclude that even off-axis light exposure may affect central visual field perception. Our results extend previous research on directed light interaction and contribute in explaining its incapacitating impact on human performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001019/pdfft?md5=014ca008f80cfcf7bc848f322ac78799&pid=1-s2.0-S0042698924001019-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strong monochromatic point light sources such as Light Emitting Diodes (LED) or Lasers have been increasingly used in recent decades. This also raises the risk of misuse resulting in glare phenomena and associated visual impairment. The objective of this prospective and partially blinded study was the visualization and characterization of glare-induced scotomas in visual field by dazzling with monochromatic point light sources in terms of disability and discomfort glare. Automated threshold perimetry under dazzling by LED exposure at three different wavelengths (470, 530 and 625 nm) and four different intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100%) was performed in 31 healthy subjects resulting in 434 visual field examinations. Visual disability was measured by sensitivity loss in the central 30° as compared to unexposed controls and visualized by reconstruction of mean visual fields for each group via backward-calculation. Psychological glare was assessed by subsequent questionnaire and evaluated based on the de Boer rating scale of discomfort. Increasing glare intensities resulted in a significant decrease in mean sensitivity for all wavelengths tested, paralleled by an increase of discomfort glare. The loss of sensitivity was scattered over all quadrants with accentuation of the corresponding mean exposure area. Reconstructed visual fields confirmed visual impairment in all quadrants at an extent of at least 30°. We conclude that even off-axis light exposure may affect central visual field perception. Our results extend previous research on directed light interaction and contribute in explaining its incapacitating impact on human performance.

眩光对中心视野感知的影响和可视化。
近几十年来,发光二极管(LED)或激光等强单色点光源的使用越来越多。这也增加了误用导致眩光现象和相关视力损伤的风险。这项前瞻性半盲研究的目的是通过单色点光源造成的眩光引起的视野阴影的可视化和特征描述,从残疾和不适眩光的角度进行分析。在三种不同波长(470、530 和 625 纳米)和四种不同强度(25、50、75 和 100%)的 LED 照射下,对 31 名健康受试者进行了眩光下的自动阈值视力测定,共进行了 434 次视野检查。与未受影响的对照组相比,视力残疾以中央 30° 的灵敏度下降为衡量标准,并通过反向计算重建每组的平均视野。心理眩光通过随后的问卷调查进行评估,并根据 de Boer 不适评定量表进行评价。眩光强度的增加导致所有测试波长的平均灵敏度显著下降,同时不适眩光增加。灵敏度的下降分布在所有象限,相应的平均照射区域更为突出。重建后的视野证实,所有象限的视力受损程度至少为 30°。我们的结论是,即使是离轴光线照射也会影响中心视野感知。我们的研究结果扩展了之前关于定向光相互作用的研究,有助于解释定向光对人类表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信