The Use of Antimicrobial Washes to Inactivate Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli from In-Shell Pecans and Wash Water Contaminated by Different Inoculation Routes

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Erin W. Ramsay , Cameron Bardsley , Karina Desiree , Peter Rubinelli , Samuel Fernandes , Jennifer C. Acuff
{"title":"The Use of Antimicrobial Washes to Inactivate Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli from In-Shell Pecans and Wash Water Contaminated by Different Inoculation Routes","authors":"Erin W. Ramsay ,&nbsp;Cameron Bardsley ,&nbsp;Karina Desiree ,&nbsp;Peter Rubinelli ,&nbsp;Samuel Fernandes ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Acuff","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In-shell pecans are typically harvested after falling from trees to the ground, presenting a potential route of contamination of foodborne pathogens from soil contact. In-shell pecans are often subjected to various processing or washing steps prior to being shelled. This study determined Shiga toxin-producing <em>Escherichia coli</em> (STEC) reductions after treatment with antimicrobial washes on direct and soil-inoculated in-shell pecans and evaluated the cross-contamination potential of the spent pecan washes after treatment. Pecans were directly and soil-inoculated with an STEC cocktail (O157:H7, O157:NM, O121, O26). Direct inoculation was achieved by spraying the STEC cocktail on the pecans. For soil-inoculation pecans, autoclaved soil was sprayed with the STEC cocktail, homogenized for 2 min, and used to coat in-shell pecans. Inoculated pecans were washed in treatments of 2% lactic acid (LA), 1,000 ppm free chlorine (sodium hypochlorite; NaClO), hot water (HW; 85 ± 2 °C), or ambient water (C [control]; 18 ± 2 °C) for 2, 5, and 10 min and diluted to enumerate STEC populations. After treatments, 100 mL of the spent wash was vacuum filtered through a 0.45-µm membrane and plated on selective agar. HW significantly reduced STEC populations from pecans with and without soil regardless of treatment time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), NaClO reduced STEC populations more than the ambient control wash on directly inoculated pecans, but there were no significant differences between STEC reductions from ambient water (C), LA, and NaClO treatments on soil-inoculated pecans (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). Larger STEC populations were enumerated from ambient water wash compared to the antimicrobial washes (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The HW, LA, and NaClO treatments were effective at maintaining the quality of the wash water, with STEC levels being generally at or below the detection limit (&lt;1 CFU/100 mL), while HW was the most effective at reducing STEC from in-shell pecans with and without a soil coating (&gt;5-log CFU/mL reductions).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 9","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001169/pdfft?md5=32c51f47429d46ef1d00887e575becb6&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X24001169-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-shell pecans are typically harvested after falling from trees to the ground, presenting a potential route of contamination of foodborne pathogens from soil contact. In-shell pecans are often subjected to various processing or washing steps prior to being shelled. This study determined Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) reductions after treatment with antimicrobial washes on direct and soil-inoculated in-shell pecans and evaluated the cross-contamination potential of the spent pecan washes after treatment. Pecans were directly and soil-inoculated with an STEC cocktail (O157:H7, O157:NM, O121, O26). Direct inoculation was achieved by spraying the STEC cocktail on the pecans. For soil-inoculation pecans, autoclaved soil was sprayed with the STEC cocktail, homogenized for 2 min, and used to coat in-shell pecans. Inoculated pecans were washed in treatments of 2% lactic acid (LA), 1,000 ppm free chlorine (sodium hypochlorite; NaClO), hot water (HW; 85 ± 2 °C), or ambient water (C [control]; 18 ± 2 °C) for 2, 5, and 10 min and diluted to enumerate STEC populations. After treatments, 100 mL of the spent wash was vacuum filtered through a 0.45-µm membrane and plated on selective agar. HW significantly reduced STEC populations from pecans with and without soil regardless of treatment time (p < 0.05), NaClO reduced STEC populations more than the ambient control wash on directly inoculated pecans, but there were no significant differences between STEC reductions from ambient water (C), LA, and NaClO treatments on soil-inoculated pecans (p > 0.05). Larger STEC populations were enumerated from ambient water wash compared to the antimicrobial washes (p < 0.05). The HW, LA, and NaClO treatments were effective at maintaining the quality of the wash water, with STEC levels being generally at or below the detection limit (<1 CFU/100 mL), while HW was the most effective at reducing STEC from in-shell pecans with and without a soil coating (>5-log CFU/mL reductions).

使用抗菌洗涤剂灭活壳内山核桃中产志贺毒素的大肠埃希氏菌以及受不同接种途径污染的洗涤水。
带壳山核桃通常是在从树上掉落到地面后采收的,因此有可能通过与土壤接触而污染食源性病原体。去壳山核桃在去壳前通常要经过各种加工或清洗步骤。本研究确定了直接和土壤接种带壳山核桃经抗菌清洗处理后产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的减少量,并评估了处理后的山核桃废清洗液的交叉污染潜力。山核桃直接和土壤接种 STEC 鸡尾酒(O157:H7、O157:NM、O121、O26)。直接接种是将 STEC 鸡尾酒喷洒在山核桃上。对于土壤接种山核桃,在高压灭菌的土壤中喷洒 STEC 鸡尾酒,匀浆 2 分钟,然后用于覆壳山核桃。接种的山核桃在 2%乳酸(LA)、1000 ppm 游离氯(次氯酸钠;NaClO)、热水(HW;85±2°C)或环境水(C[对照];18±2°C)中洗涤 2、5 和 10 分钟,并稀释以枚举 STEC 种群。处理后,用 0.45 微米滤膜真空过滤 100 毫升废水,然后将其滴在选择性琼脂上。无论处理时间长短(p0.05),HW 都能明显减少有土壤和无土壤山核桃中 STEC 的数量。与抗菌剂水洗法相比,常温水洗法中的 STEC 数量更大(p5-log CFU/mL 减少量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信