Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab: A Time and Motion Substudy of a Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab for Stage I HER2+ Breast Cancer (ADEPT trial).

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Adrienne G Waks, Emily L Chen, Noah Graham, Anna Mae Frey, Kenneth Almeida, Victoria Attaya, Cari Ryding, Ibrahim Abbass, Anita Fung, Jesse Sussell, Patricia Cortazar, Caroline Harvey, Denise Leth, Meredith Faggen, Natalie Sinclair, Jeanna Walsh, Nadine Tung, Sarah Sinclair, Steve Lo, Denise Yardley, Vicente Valero, Jane Meisel, Tarah J Ballinger, Sylvia Adams, Lisa A Carey, Julia K Rauch, Vandana G Abramson, Nicole O Williams, Wendy Y Chen, Jose P Leone, Susan T Schumer, Nabihah Tayob, Sara M Tolaney
{"title":"Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab: A Time and Motion Substudy of a Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab for Stage I HER2+ Breast Cancer (ADEPT trial).","authors":"Adrienne G Waks, Emily L Chen, Noah Graham, Anna Mae Frey, Kenneth Almeida, Victoria Attaya, Cari Ryding, Ibrahim Abbass, Anita Fung, Jesse Sussell, Patricia Cortazar, Caroline Harvey, Denise Leth, Meredith Faggen, Natalie Sinclair, Jeanna Walsh, Nadine Tung, Sarah Sinclair, Steve Lo, Denise Yardley, Vicente Valero, Jane Meisel, Tarah J Ballinger, Sylvia Adams, Lisa A Carey, Julia K Rauch, Vandana G Abramson, Nicole O Williams, Wendy Y Chen, Jose P Leone, Susan T Schumer, Nabihah Tayob, Sara M Tolaney","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The time required for in-clinic drug administration can substantially affect breast cancer patients' quality of life. Subcutaneous (SC) drug administration, as opposed to intravenous (IV), may reduce this time commitment. This study sought to estimate the difference in time burden between IV and SC administration of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled a subcohort of patients participating in the ADEPT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04569747, investigating adjuvant HP plus endocrine therapy for stage I human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer) to this single-arm crossover time and motion substudy. Patients received two cycles of IV HP followed by two cycles of SC HP. During each cycle, time points in drug preparation and administration were captured. The primary end point was total patient time in the treatment chair. Additional end points included total patient treatment experience time and total pharmacy workflow time. A sample size of 22 patients was estimated to provide 90.7% power with two-sided alpha .05 to detect a difference of 70 minutes in the primary end point by treatment arm (IV <i>v</i> SC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The mean total patient time in the treatment chair was 61.8 minutes shorter with SC versus IV HP (22.5 <i>v</i> 84.3 minutes; <i>P</i> < .0001). The mean total patient treatment experience time (incorporating time spent waiting for treatment initiation and time spent in the treatment chair) was 81.8 minutes shorter for SC administration (96 <i>v</i> 177.8 minutes; <i>P</i> < .0001). The pharmacy workflow time was 78.2 minutes shorter for SC versus IV formulation (41 <i>v</i> 119.2 minutes; <i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SC administration of HP shortened patient time burden by approximately 1 hour. SC drug administration can facilitate faster workflows for health care professionals and improve patients' breast cancer treatment experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The time required for in-clinic drug administration can substantially affect breast cancer patients' quality of life. Subcutaneous (SC) drug administration, as opposed to intravenous (IV), may reduce this time commitment. This study sought to estimate the difference in time burden between IV and SC administration of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP).

Methods: We prospectively enrolled a subcohort of patients participating in the ADEPT trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04569747, investigating adjuvant HP plus endocrine therapy for stage I human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer) to this single-arm crossover time and motion substudy. Patients received two cycles of IV HP followed by two cycles of SC HP. During each cycle, time points in drug preparation and administration were captured. The primary end point was total patient time in the treatment chair. Additional end points included total patient treatment experience time and total pharmacy workflow time. A sample size of 22 patients was estimated to provide 90.7% power with two-sided alpha .05 to detect a difference of 70 minutes in the primary end point by treatment arm (IV v SC).

Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The mean total patient time in the treatment chair was 61.8 minutes shorter with SC versus IV HP (22.5 v 84.3 minutes; P < .0001). The mean total patient treatment experience time (incorporating time spent waiting for treatment initiation and time spent in the treatment chair) was 81.8 minutes shorter for SC administration (96 v 177.8 minutes; P < .0001). The pharmacy workflow time was 78.2 minutes shorter for SC versus IV formulation (41 v 119.2 minutes; P < .0001).

Conclusion: SC administration of HP shortened patient time burden by approximately 1 hour. SC drug administration can facilitate faster workflows for health care professionals and improve patients' breast cancer treatment experience.

皮下注射与静脉注射曲妥珠单抗/帕妥珠单抗:曲妥珠单抗/帕妥珠单抗辅助治疗 I 期 HER2+ 乳腺癌 II 期试验(ADEPT 试验)的时间与运动子研究。
目的:门诊给药所需的时间会严重影响乳腺癌患者的生活质量。皮下注射(SC)给药与静脉注射(IV)给药相比,可以减少这种时间负担。本研究旨在估算曲妥珠单抗和百妥珠单抗(HP)静脉注射和皮下注射给药在时间负担上的差异:我们对参与 ADEPT 试验(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT04569747,研究I期人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌的辅助HP加内分泌治疗)的患者参加这项单臂交叉时间和运动子研究。患者先接受两个周期的静脉注射 HP,然后再接受两个周期的 SC HP。在每个周期中,药物准备和给药的时间点都被记录下来。主要终点是患者在治疗椅上的总时间。其他终点包括患者治疗体验总时间和药房工作流程总时间。据估计,22 名患者的样本量可提供 90.7% 的功率(双侧α值为 0.05),以检测治疗臂(静脉注射 v SC)在主要终点上 70 分钟的差异:结果:22 名患者接受了治疗。患者在治疗椅上的平均总时间为 SC 对 IV HP(22.5 对 84.3 分钟;P < .0001),缩短了 61.8 分钟。静脉注射给药的患者总治疗时间(包括等待开始治疗的时间和在治疗椅上的时间)平均缩短了 81.8 分钟(96 分钟对 177.8 分钟;P < .0001)。药房工作流程时间为:皮下注射制剂比静脉注射制剂缩短 78.2 分钟(41 分钟对 119.2 分钟;P < .0001):结论:经皮给药可将患者的时间负担缩短约 1 小时。经皮给药可加快医护人员的工作流程,改善患者的乳腺癌治疗体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信