Genetic distance and ancestry proportion modify the association between maternal genetic risk score of type 2 diabetes and fetal growth.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold, Prabhavi Wijesiriwardhana, Richard J Biedrzycki, Fasil Tekola-Ayele
{"title":"Genetic distance and ancestry proportion modify the association between maternal genetic risk score of type 2 diabetes and fetal growth.","authors":"Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold, Prabhavi Wijesiriwardhana, Richard J Biedrzycki, Fasil Tekola-Ayele","doi":"10.1186/s40246-024-00645-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal genetic risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with fetal growth, but the influence of genetic ancestry is not yet fully understood. We aimed to investigate the influence of genetic distance (GD) and genetic ancestry proportion (GAP) on the association of maternal genetic risk score of T2D (GRS<sub>T2D</sub>) with fetal weight and birthweight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-ancestral pregnant women (n = 1,837) from the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies - Singletons cohort were included in the current analyses. Fetal weight (in grams, g) was estimated from ultrasound measurements of fetal biometry, and birthweight (g) was measured at delivery. GRS<sub>T2D</sub> was calculated using T2D-associated variants identified in the latest trans-ancestral genome-wide association study and was categorized into quartiles. GD and GAP were estimated using genotype data of four reference populations. GD was categorized into closest, middle, and farthest tertiles, and GAP was categorized as highest, medium, and lowest. Linear regression analyses were performed to test the association of GRS<sub>T2D</sub> with fetal weight and birthweight, adjusted for covariates, in each GD and GAP category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among women with the closest GD from African and Amerindigenous ancestries, the fourth and third GRS<sub>T2D</sub> quartile was significantly associated with 5.18 to 7.48 g (weeks 17-20) and 6.83 to 25.44 g (weeks 19-27) larger fetal weight compared to the first quartile, respectively. Among women with middle GD from European ancestry, the fourth GRS<sub>T2D</sub> quartile was significantly associated with 5.73 to 21.21 g (weeks 18-26) larger fetal weight. Furthermore, among women with middle GD from European and African ancestries, the fourth and second GRS<sub>T2D</sub> quartiles were significantly associated with 117.04 g (95% CI = 23.88-210.20, p = 0.014) and 95.05 g (95% CI = 4.73-185.36, p = 0.039) larger birthweight compared to the first quartile, respectively. The absence of significant association among women with the closest GD from East Asian ancestry was complemented by a positive significant association among women with the highest East Asian GAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between maternal GRS<sub>T2D</sub> and fetal growth began in early-second trimester and was influenced by GD and GAP. The results suggest the use of genetic GD and GAP could improve the generalizability of GRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":13183,"journal":{"name":"Human Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-024-00645-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal genetic risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with fetal growth, but the influence of genetic ancestry is not yet fully understood. We aimed to investigate the influence of genetic distance (GD) and genetic ancestry proportion (GAP) on the association of maternal genetic risk score of T2D (GRST2D) with fetal weight and birthweight.

Methods: Multi-ancestral pregnant women (n = 1,837) from the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies - Singletons cohort were included in the current analyses. Fetal weight (in grams, g) was estimated from ultrasound measurements of fetal biometry, and birthweight (g) was measured at delivery. GRST2D was calculated using T2D-associated variants identified in the latest trans-ancestral genome-wide association study and was categorized into quartiles. GD and GAP were estimated using genotype data of four reference populations. GD was categorized into closest, middle, and farthest tertiles, and GAP was categorized as highest, medium, and lowest. Linear regression analyses were performed to test the association of GRST2D with fetal weight and birthweight, adjusted for covariates, in each GD and GAP category.

Results: Among women with the closest GD from African and Amerindigenous ancestries, the fourth and third GRST2D quartile was significantly associated with 5.18 to 7.48 g (weeks 17-20) and 6.83 to 25.44 g (weeks 19-27) larger fetal weight compared to the first quartile, respectively. Among women with middle GD from European ancestry, the fourth GRST2D quartile was significantly associated with 5.73 to 21.21 g (weeks 18-26) larger fetal weight. Furthermore, among women with middle GD from European and African ancestries, the fourth and second GRST2D quartiles were significantly associated with 117.04 g (95% CI = 23.88-210.20, p = 0.014) and 95.05 g (95% CI = 4.73-185.36, p = 0.039) larger birthweight compared to the first quartile, respectively. The absence of significant association among women with the closest GD from East Asian ancestry was complemented by a positive significant association among women with the highest East Asian GAP.

Conclusions: The association between maternal GRST2D and fetal growth began in early-second trimester and was influenced by GD and GAP. The results suggest the use of genetic GD and GAP could improve the generalizability of GRS.

遗传距离和祖先比例会改变母体 2 型糖尿病遗传风险评分与胎儿生长之间的关联。
背景:2型糖尿病(T2D)的母体遗传风险与胎儿生长有关,但遗传祖先的影响尚未完全明了。我们旨在研究遗传距离(GD)和遗传祖先比例(GAP)对母体 2 型糖尿病遗传风险评分(GRST2D)与胎儿体重和出生体重相关性的影响:本次分析纳入了 NICHD 胎儿生长研究 - 单胎队列中的多祖先孕妇(n = 1,837)。胎儿体重(以克为单位)根据胎儿生物测量的超声波测量结果估算,出生体重(以克为单位)则在分娩时测量。GRST2D使用最新的跨祖先全基因组关联研究中发现的T2D相关变异进行计算,并分为四等分。GD和GAP是利用四个参考人群的基因型数据估算的。GD分为最近、中间和最远三等分,GAP分为最高、中等和最低三等分。在对各GD和GAP类别的协变量进行调整后,对GRST2D与胎儿体重和出生体重的关系进行了线性回归分析:在GD最接近的非洲裔和美洲土著妇女中,GRST2D的第四和第三四分位数与第一四分位数相比,分别与胎儿体重增加5.18至7.48克(第17至20周)和6.83至25.44克(第19至27周)显著相关。在欧洲血统的中等 GD 孕妇中,GRST2D 四分位数的第四位与胎儿体重增加 5.73 至 21.21 克(第 18-26 周)显著相关。此外,在欧洲血统和非洲血统的中等 GD 孕妇中,与第一四分位数相比,第四和第二 GRST2D 四分位数分别与 117.04 克(95% CI = 23.88-210.20,p = 0.014)和 95.05 克(95% CI = 4.73-185.36,p = 0.039)较大的出生体重显著相关。与东亚血统最接近的 GD 妇女之间没有显着关联,而与东亚 GAP 最高的妇女之间存在正向显着关联:结论:母体 GRST2D 与胎儿生长的关系始于妊娠早期的第二个三个月,并受 GD 和 GAP 的影响。结果表明,使用遗传 GD 和 GAP 可以提高 GRS 的普适性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Genomics
Human Genomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Genomics is a peer-reviewed, open access, online journal that focuses on the application of genomic analysis in all aspects of human health and disease, as well as genomic analysis of drug efficacy and safety, and comparative genomics. Topics covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: pharmacogenomics, genome-wide association studies, genome-wide sequencing, exome sequencing, next-generation deep-sequencing, functional genomics, epigenomics, translational genomics, expression profiling, proteomics, bioinformatics, animal models, statistical genetics, genetic epidemiology, human population genetics and comparative genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信