Can metformin prevent cancer relative to sulfonylureas? A target trial emulation accounting for competing risks and poor overlap via double/debiased machine learning estimators.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shenbo Xu, Bang Zheng, Bowen Su, Stan Neil Finkelstein, Roy Welsch, Kenney Ng, Zach Shahn
{"title":"Can metformin prevent cancer relative to sulfonylureas? A target trial emulation accounting for competing risks and poor overlap via double/debiased machine learning estimators.","authors":"Shenbo Xu, Bang Zheng, Bowen Su, Stan Neil Finkelstein, Roy Welsch, Kenney Ng, Zach Shahn","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is mounting interest in the possibility that metformin, indicated for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, has a range of additional beneficial effects. Randomized trials have shown that metformin prevents adverse cardiovascular events, and metformin use has also been associated with reduced cognitive decline and cancer incidence. In this paper, we dig more deeply into whether metformin prevents cancer by emulating target randomized trials comparing metformin to sulfonylureas as first-line diabetes therapy using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a UK primary-care database (1987-2018). We included 93 353 individuals with diabetes, no prior cancer diagnosis, no chronic kidney disease, and no prior diabetes therapy who initiated use of metformin (n = 79 489) or a sulfonylurea (n = 13 864). In our cohort, the estimated overlap-weighted additive separable direct effect of metformin compared with sulfonylureas on cancer risk at 6 years was -1 percentage point (95% CI, -2.2 to 0.1), which is consistent with metformin's providing no direct protection against cancer incidence or substantial protection. The analysis faced 2 methodological challenges: (1) poor overlap and (2) precancer death as a competing risk. To address these issues while minimizing nuisance model misspecification, we develop and apply double/debiased machine learning estimators of overlap-weighted separable effects in addition to more traditional effect estimates. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"512-523"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is mounting interest in the possibility that metformin, indicated for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, has a range of additional beneficial effects. Randomized trials have shown that metformin prevents adverse cardiovascular events, and metformin use has also been associated with reduced cognitive decline and cancer incidence. In this paper, we dig more deeply into whether metformin prevents cancer by emulating target randomized trials comparing metformin to sulfonylureas as first-line diabetes therapy using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a UK primary-care database (1987-2018). We included 93 353 individuals with diabetes, no prior cancer diagnosis, no chronic kidney disease, and no prior diabetes therapy who initiated use of metformin (n = 79 489) or a sulfonylurea (n = 13 864). In our cohort, the estimated overlap-weighted additive separable direct effect of metformin compared with sulfonylureas on cancer risk at 6 years was -1 percentage point (95% CI, -2.2 to 0.1), which is consistent with metformin's providing no direct protection against cancer incidence or substantial protection. The analysis faced 2 methodological challenges: (1) poor overlap and (2) precancer death as a competing risk. To address these issues while minimizing nuisance model misspecification, we develop and apply double/debiased machine learning estimators of overlap-weighted separable effects in addition to more traditional effect estimates. This article is part of a Special Collection on Pharmacoepidemiology.

相对于磺脲类药物,二甲双胍能预防癌症吗?通过双重/偏差机器学习估计器考虑竞争风险和重叠性差的目标试验模拟。
二甲双胍是用于控制 2 型糖尿病患者血糖的药物,它可能还具有其他一系列有益的作用,这一点正引起越来越多的关注。随机试验表明,二甲双胍可预防不良心血管事件,使用二甲双胍还可降低认知能力下降和癌症发病率。在本文中,我们利用英国初级保健数据库 "临床实践研究数据链"(Clinical Practice Research Datalink)中的数据(1987-2018 年),通过模仿比较二甲双胍和磺脲类药物作为糖尿病一线疗法的目标随机试验,对二甲双胍是否能预防癌症进行了更深入的研究。我们纳入了既往无癌症诊断、无慢性肾病、既往未接受过糖尿病治疗,且开始服用二甲双胍(N=93353)或磺脲类药物(N=13864)的糖尿病患者。在我们的队列中,与磺脲类药物相比,二甲双胍对6年后癌症风险的重叠加权可分离直接效应估计值为-1%(.95 CI=-2.2%,0.1%),这与二甲双胍对癌症发病率不提供直接保护或提供实质性保护是一致的。该分析面临两个方法上的挑战--重叠性差,以及作为竞争风险的癌前死亡。为了解决这些问题,同时最大限度地减少干扰模型的错误规范,我们开发并应用了重叠加权可分离效应的双重/偏差机器学习估算器,以及更传统的效应估算器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信