Effect of conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes on salivary biomarkers: A systematic review.

Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry Pub Date : 2024-04-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/japid.2024.006

Amirmohammad Dolatabadi, Faranak Noori, Amir Raee

{"title":"Effect of conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes on salivary biomarkers: A systematic review.","authors":"Amirmohammad Dolatabadi, Faranak Noori, Amir Raee","doi":"10.34172/japid.2024.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: E-cigarette consumption is increasing, and like conventional smoking, it can cause some harmful effects. This systematic review compared the effect of conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes on salivary biomarkers.Methods: The search strategies included electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE) and related journals up to May 2023. A qualitative assessment was performed on data extracted from the included studies. Seven studies were included in this systematic review (number of patients=563).Results: Eleven biomarkers were assessed and compared between e-cigarette and conventional cigarette smokers. The data showed that the different effects of electronic and conventional cigarettes on the level of these biomarkers were not achievable. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies (I2 statistic>90%), performing a meta-analysis was impossible. Even after a sub-group classification, homogeneous data were not achieved.Conclusion: The current data do not provide evidence of obtainable outcomes between conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes on salivary biomarkers.","PeriodicalId":73584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","volume":"16 1","pages":"44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2024.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: E-cigarette consumption is increasing, and like conventional smoking, it can cause some harmful effects. This systematic review compared the effect of conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes on salivary biomarkers.

Methods: The search strategies included electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE) and related journals up to May 2023. A qualitative assessment was performed on data extracted from the included studies. Seven studies were included in this systematic review (number of patients=563).

Results: Eleven biomarkers were assessed and compared between e-cigarette and conventional cigarette smokers. The data showed that the different effects of electronic and conventional cigarettes on the level of these biomarkers were not achievable. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies (I² statistic>90%), performing a meta-analysis was impossible. Even after a sub-group classification, homogeneous data were not achieved.

Conclusion: The current data do not provide evidence of obtainable outcomes between conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes on salivary biomarkers.

查看原文本刊更多论文

传统香烟和电子烟对唾液生物标志物的影响：系统综述。

背景：电子烟的消费量正在增加，与传统吸烟一样，电子烟也会造成一些有害影响。本系统综述比较了传统香烟和电子烟对唾液生物标志物的影响：检索策略包括截至 2023 年 5 月的电子数据库（Medline/PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE）和相关期刊。对从纳入研究中提取的数据进行了定性评估。本系统综述共纳入七项研究（患者人数=563）：对电子烟和传统香烟吸烟者的 11 种生物标志物进行了评估和比较。数据显示，电子烟和传统香烟对这些生物标志物水平的不同影响是无法实现的。由于研究的异质性（I2 统计量>90%），不可能进行荟萃分析。即使进行了亚组分类，也无法获得同质数据：目前的数据无法证明传统香烟和电子烟对唾液生物标志物的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊