Advancements in stimulation therapies for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Rosalie Bordett, Khadija B Danazumi, Suranji Wijekoon, Christopher J Garcia, Sama Abdulmalik, Sangamesh G Kumbar
{"title":"Advancements in stimulation therapies for peripheral nerve regeneration.","authors":"Rosalie Bordett, Khadija B Danazumi, Suranji Wijekoon, Christopher J Garcia, Sama Abdulmalik, Sangamesh G Kumbar","doi":"10.1088/1748-605X/ad651d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soft-tissue injuries affecting muscles, nerves, vasculature, tendons, and ligaments often diminish the quality of life due to pain, loss of function, and financial burdens. Both natural healing and surgical interventions can result in scarring, which potentially may impede functional recovery and lead to persistent pain. Scar tissue, characterized by a highly disorganized fibrotic extracellular matrix, may serve as a physical barrier to regeneration and drug delivery. While approaches such as drugs, biomaterials, cells, external stimulation, and other physical forces show promise in mitigating scarring and promoting regenerative healing, their implementation remains limited and challenging. Ultrasound, laser, electrical, and magnetic forms of external stimulation have been utilized to promote soft tissue as well as neural tissue regeneration. After stimulation, neural tissues experience increased proliferation of Schwann cells, secretion of neurotropic factors, production of myelin, and growth of vasculature, all aimed at supporting axon regeneration and innervation. Yet, the outcomes of healing vary depending on the pathophysiology of the damaged nerve, the timing of stimulation following injury, and the specific parameters of stimulation employed. Increased treatment intensity and duration have been noted to hinder the healing process by inducing tissue damage. These stimulation modalities, either alone or in combination with nerve guidance conduits and scaffolds, have been demonstrated to promote healing. However, the literature currently lacks a detailed understanding of the stimulation parameters used for nerve healing applications. In this article, we aim to address this gap by summarizing existing reports and providing an overview of stimulation parameters alongside their associated healing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72389,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ad651d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soft-tissue injuries affecting muscles, nerves, vasculature, tendons, and ligaments often diminish the quality of life due to pain, loss of function, and financial burdens. Both natural healing and surgical interventions can result in scarring, which potentially may impede functional recovery and lead to persistent pain. Scar tissue, characterized by a highly disorganized fibrotic extracellular matrix, may serve as a physical barrier to regeneration and drug delivery. While approaches such as drugs, biomaterials, cells, external stimulation, and other physical forces show promise in mitigating scarring and promoting regenerative healing, their implementation remains limited and challenging. Ultrasound, laser, electrical, and magnetic forms of external stimulation have been utilized to promote soft tissue as well as neural tissue regeneration. After stimulation, neural tissues experience increased proliferation of Schwann cells, secretion of neurotropic factors, production of myelin, and growth of vasculature, all aimed at supporting axon regeneration and innervation. Yet, the outcomes of healing vary depending on the pathophysiology of the damaged nerve, the timing of stimulation following injury, and the specific parameters of stimulation employed. Increased treatment intensity and duration have been noted to hinder the healing process by inducing tissue damage. These stimulation modalities, either alone or in combination with nerve guidance conduits and scaffolds, have been demonstrated to promote healing. However, the literature currently lacks a detailed understanding of the stimulation parameters used for nerve healing applications. In this article, we aim to address this gap by summarizing existing reports and providing an overview of stimulation parameters alongside their associated healing outcomes.

外周神经再生刺激疗法的进展。
影响肌肉、神经、血管、肌腱和韧带的软组织损伤往往会因疼痛、功能丧失和经济负担而降低生活质量。自然愈合和手术干预都可能导致疤痕,这可能会阻碍功能恢复并导致持续疼痛。疤痕组织的特点是细胞外基质(ECM)高度紊乱,可能成为再生和药物输送的物理障碍。虽然药物、生物材料、细胞、外部刺激和其他物理力量等方法有望减轻疤痕和促进再生愈合,但其实施仍然有限且具有挑战性。超声波、激光、电和磁等形式的外部刺激已被用于促进软组织和神经组织的再生。刺激后,神经组织的许旺细胞增殖、神经刺激因子的分泌、髓鞘的生成和血管的生长都会增加,所有这些都旨在支持轴突再生和神经支配。然而,愈合的结果因受损神经的病理生理学、损伤后刺激的时间以及采用的特定刺激参数而异。人们注意到,治疗强度和持续时间的增加会导致组织损伤,从而阻碍愈合过程。这些刺激模式,无论是单独使用还是与神经引导导管和支架结合使用,都已被证明可以促进愈合。然而,目前的文献缺乏对用于神经愈合应用的刺激参数的详细了解。在这篇文章中,我们总结了现有的报告,概述了刺激参数及其相关的愈合结果,旨在弥补这一不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信