Comparative assessment of the physical structure of antler and bovine bone substitutes: An in vitro study.

Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry Pub Date : 2024-05-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/japid.2024.012
Mohammad Hossein Mahboubian, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh, Reza Amid, Anahita Moscowchi
{"title":"Comparative assessment of the physical structure of antler and bovine bone substitutes: An in vitro study.","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Mahboubian, Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh, Reza Amid, Anahita Moscowchi","doi":"10.34172/japid.2024.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of bone graft materials has significantly increased. Given the inherent variations in structure and functionality between different grafting materials, this evaluated and compared the physical attributes of antler and bovine femur bone substitutes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the present in vitro investigation, the surface morphological architecture of the two bone substitutes with different origins was assessed through scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique was employed to measure the porosity, specific surface area (SSA), and pore morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scanning electron microscopy observations indicated that the surface of the bovine particles appeared smoother, while the antler particles exhibited a rougher surface texture. The BET analysis revealed that both samples exhibited identical pore morphology. The SSA was 15.974 m<sup>2</sup>/g in the antler particles compared with 18.404 m<sup>2</sup>/g in the bovine sample. The total porosity volume in the antler and bovine femur bone substitutes were 0.2172 cm<sup>3</sup>/g and 0.2918 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, respectively. Additionally, the antler particles had a porosity percentage of 40%, whereas the bovine femur bone substitute showed a porosity percentage of 43.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results of this study, it seems that the two samples of bone grafting materials have comparable physical structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","volume":"16 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2024.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of bone graft materials has significantly increased. Given the inherent variations in structure and functionality between different grafting materials, this evaluated and compared the physical attributes of antler and bovine femur bone substitutes.

Methods: In the present in vitro investigation, the surface morphological architecture of the two bone substitutes with different origins was assessed through scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique was employed to measure the porosity, specific surface area (SSA), and pore morphology.

Results: Scanning electron microscopy observations indicated that the surface of the bovine particles appeared smoother, while the antler particles exhibited a rougher surface texture. The BET analysis revealed that both samples exhibited identical pore morphology. The SSA was 15.974 m2/g in the antler particles compared with 18.404 m2/g in the bovine sample. The total porosity volume in the antler and bovine femur bone substitutes were 0.2172 cm3/g and 0.2918 cm3/g, respectively. Additionally, the antler particles had a porosity percentage of 40%, whereas the bovine femur bone substitute showed a porosity percentage of 43.5%.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it seems that the two samples of bone grafting materials have comparable physical structures.

鹿角和牛骨替代物物理结构的比较评估:体外研究。
背景:骨移植材料的使用大幅增加。鉴于不同移植材料在结构和功能上的固有差异,本研究对鹿茸和牛股骨骨替代物的物理属性进行了评估和比较:在本体外研究中,通过扫描电子显微镜评估了两种不同来源骨替代物的表面形态结构。此外,还采用布鲁纳-艾美特-泰勒(BET)技术测量了孔隙率、比表面积(SSA)和孔隙形态:结果:扫描电子显微镜观察表明,牛颗粒的表面看起来更光滑,而鹿角颗粒的表面纹理更粗糙。BET 分析表明,两种样品的孔隙形态相同。鹿角颗粒的 SSA 为 15.974 m2/g,而牛样品为 18.404 m2/g。鹿角和牛股骨替代物的总孔隙体积分别为 0.2172 立方厘米/克和 0.2918 立方厘米/克。此外,鹿角颗粒的孔隙率为 40%,而牛股骨替代物的孔隙率为 43.5%:结论:根据这项研究的结果,两种骨移植材料样本似乎具有相似的物理结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信