Jason Strawbridge, John Y Cheng, Bradley S Gundlach, Tessa Gillespie, Reem Karmouta, Monica Khitri, Alison Chu, Irena Tsui
{"title":"SHORT-TERM REACTIVATION OF RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER PRIMARY RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT.","authors":"Jason Strawbridge, John Y Cheng, Bradley S Gundlach, Tessa Gillespie, Reem Karmouta, Monica Khitri, Alison Chu, Irena Tsui","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Investigate risk factors for short-term reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy and determine safety and efficacy of repeat injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review study of patients screened for ROP as inpatients between 2013 and 2023 who received IVR within the UCLA health care system. Primary outcomes were rates and timing of short-term ROP reactivation, defined as repeat worsening of ROP to stage 2 or 3 before 52 weeks postmenstrual age, as well as risk factors for reactivation. Other outcomes included adverse events and rates of reactivation after a second intravitreal injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two eyes of 43 patients received primary IVR 0.25 mg/0.025 cc for type 1 ROP. Thirteen patients (22 eyes) (30.2% of patients, 26.8% of eyes) developed short-term reactivation an average of 7.2 weeks ± 1.7 weeks after treatment. Increased reactivation risk was associated with zone I disease (odds ratio 6.23, 95% CI, 1.35-28.7, P = 0.019), lower postmenstrual age at first injection (odds ratio 1.64, 95% CI, 1.19-2.26; P = 0.003), and lower gestational age at birth (odds ratio 1.80, 95% CI, 1.04-3.13, P = 0.037). Of the 13 patients that received repeat injections, five required laser treatment for a second reactivation (11.6% of patients receiving IVR). No eyes developed retinal vascular occlusion, endophthalmitis, or cataract.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Repeat injections may be required after primary IVR for aggressive ROP. Repeat IVR treatment for ROP is effective and poses few ophthalmic adverse events, although additional reactivation remains a risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1945-1951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Investigate risk factors for short-term reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy and determine safety and efficacy of repeat injections.
Methods: Retrospective chart review study of patients screened for ROP as inpatients between 2013 and 2023 who received IVR within the UCLA health care system. Primary outcomes were rates and timing of short-term ROP reactivation, defined as repeat worsening of ROP to stage 2 or 3 before 52 weeks postmenstrual age, as well as risk factors for reactivation. Other outcomes included adverse events and rates of reactivation after a second intravitreal injection.
Results: Eighty-two eyes of 43 patients received primary IVR 0.25 mg/0.025 cc for type 1 ROP. Thirteen patients (22 eyes) (30.2% of patients, 26.8% of eyes) developed short-term reactivation an average of 7.2 weeks ± 1.7 weeks after treatment. Increased reactivation risk was associated with zone I disease (odds ratio 6.23, 95% CI, 1.35-28.7, P = 0.019), lower postmenstrual age at first injection (odds ratio 1.64, 95% CI, 1.19-2.26; P = 0.003), and lower gestational age at birth (odds ratio 1.80, 95% CI, 1.04-3.13, P = 0.037). Of the 13 patients that received repeat injections, five required laser treatment for a second reactivation (11.6% of patients receiving IVR). No eyes developed retinal vascular occlusion, endophthalmitis, or cataract.
Conclusion: Repeat injections may be required after primary IVR for aggressive ROP. Repeat IVR treatment for ROP is effective and poses few ophthalmic adverse events, although additional reactivation remains a risk.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.