Patterns of Skin Picking in Skin Picking Disorder: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Christina Gallinat, Markus Moessner, Maximilian Wilhelm, Nancy Keuthen, Stephanie Bauer
{"title":"Patterns of Skin Picking in Skin Picking Disorder: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.","authors":"Christina Gallinat, Markus Moessner, Maximilian Wilhelm, Nancy Keuthen, Stephanie Bauer","doi":"10.2196/53831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin picking disorder (SPD) is an understudied mental illness that is classified as a body-focused repetitive behavior disorder. Literature suggests that pathological skin picking is strongly integrated into the daily lives of affected individuals and may involve a high degree of variability in terms of episode characteristics, frequency, and intensity. However, existing data on the phenomenology of SPD are limited and typically involve retrospective assessments, which may fail to accurately capture the behavior's variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate skin picking in the daily lives of individuals with SPD by using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). The first aim focused on the description of skin picking patterns (eg, characteristics, intensity, and distribution of episodes and urges), and the second aim explored differences in characteristics and patterns between automatic and focused skin picking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited online and underwent a web-based screening, a diagnostic telephone interview, and a comprehensive online self-report questionnaire before participating in an EMA protocol. The latter included 10 consecutive days with 7 pseudorandom, time-contingent assessments per day between 8 AM and 10 PM. The EMA questionnaire assessed the current skin picking urge, the occurrence of the behavior, and a detailed assessment of the episodes' characteristics (eg, length, intensity, and consciousness) if applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample consisted of 57 participants, who completed at least 70% of the scheduled assessments (n=54, 94.7% female: mean age 29.3, SD 6.77 years). They completed 3758 EMAs and reported 1467 skin picking episodes. Skin picking occurred frequently (mean 2.57, SD 1.12 episodes per day and person) in relatively short episodes (10-30 min; 10 min: n<sub>episodes</sub>=642, 43.8%; 20 min: n<sub>episodes</sub>=312, 21.3%; 30 min: n<sub>episodes</sub>=217, 14.8%), and it was distributed quite evenly throughout the day and across different days of the week. Focused and automatic episodes were relatively balanced across all reported episodes (focused: n<sub>episodes</sub>=806, 54.9%) and over the course of the day. The analyses showed statistically significant differences between self-reported triggers for the different styles. Visual or tactile cues and the desire to pick the skin were more important for the focused style (visual or tactile cues: mean focused style [M<sub>f</sub>]=4.01, SD 0.69 vs mean automatic style [M<sub>a</sub>]=3.47, SD 0.99; P<.001; SMD=0.64; desire to pick: M<sub>f</sub>=2.61, SD 1.06 vs M<sub>a</sub>=1.94, SD 1.03; P<.001; SMD=0.82), while boredom and concentration problems were more prominent in automatic skin picking (boredom: M<sub>f</sub>=1.69, SD 0.89 vs M<sub>a</sub>=1.84, SD 0.89; P=.03; SMD=-0.31; concentration problems: M<sub>f</sub>=2.06, SD 0.87 vs M<sub>a</sub>=2.31, SD 1.06; P=.006; SMD=-0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results contribute to an enhanced understanding of the phenomenology of SPD using a more rigorous assessment methodology. Our findings underscore that picking can impact affected persons multiple times throughout their daily lives.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025168; https://tinyurl.com/mr35pdwh.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin picking disorder (SPD) is an understudied mental illness that is classified as a body-focused repetitive behavior disorder. Literature suggests that pathological skin picking is strongly integrated into the daily lives of affected individuals and may involve a high degree of variability in terms of episode characteristics, frequency, and intensity. However, existing data on the phenomenology of SPD are limited and typically involve retrospective assessments, which may fail to accurately capture the behavior's variability.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate skin picking in the daily lives of individuals with SPD by using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). The first aim focused on the description of skin picking patterns (eg, characteristics, intensity, and distribution of episodes and urges), and the second aim explored differences in characteristics and patterns between automatic and focused skin picking.

Methods: Participants were recruited online and underwent a web-based screening, a diagnostic telephone interview, and a comprehensive online self-report questionnaire before participating in an EMA protocol. The latter included 10 consecutive days with 7 pseudorandom, time-contingent assessments per day between 8 AM and 10 PM. The EMA questionnaire assessed the current skin picking urge, the occurrence of the behavior, and a detailed assessment of the episodes' characteristics (eg, length, intensity, and consciousness) if applicable.

Results: The final sample consisted of 57 participants, who completed at least 70% of the scheduled assessments (n=54, 94.7% female: mean age 29.3, SD 6.77 years). They completed 3758 EMAs and reported 1467 skin picking episodes. Skin picking occurred frequently (mean 2.57, SD 1.12 episodes per day and person) in relatively short episodes (10-30 min; 10 min: nepisodes=642, 43.8%; 20 min: nepisodes=312, 21.3%; 30 min: nepisodes=217, 14.8%), and it was distributed quite evenly throughout the day and across different days of the week. Focused and automatic episodes were relatively balanced across all reported episodes (focused: nepisodes=806, 54.9%) and over the course of the day. The analyses showed statistically significant differences between self-reported triggers for the different styles. Visual or tactile cues and the desire to pick the skin were more important for the focused style (visual or tactile cues: mean focused style [Mf]=4.01, SD 0.69 vs mean automatic style [Ma]=3.47, SD 0.99; P<.001; SMD=0.64; desire to pick: Mf=2.61, SD 1.06 vs Ma=1.94, SD 1.03; P<.001; SMD=0.82), while boredom and concentration problems were more prominent in automatic skin picking (boredom: Mf=1.69, SD 0.89 vs Ma=1.84, SD 0.89; P=.03; SMD=-0.31; concentration problems: Mf=2.06, SD 0.87 vs Ma=2.31, SD 1.06; P=.006; SMD=-0.41).

Conclusions: These results contribute to an enhanced understanding of the phenomenology of SPD using a more rigorous assessment methodology. Our findings underscore that picking can impact affected persons multiple times throughout their daily lives.

Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025168; https://tinyurl.com/mr35pdwh.

皮肤搔痒症患者的皮肤搔痒模式:生态学瞬间评估研究
背景:抠皮症(SPD)是一种研究不足的精神疾病,被归类为以身体为中心的重复行为障碍。文献表明,病理性抠皮与患者的日常生活密切相关,在发作特征、频率和强度方面可能存在很大的差异性。然而,现有的有关抠皮症现象学的数据非常有限,而且通常都是回顾性评估,可能无法准确捕捉到该行为的可变性:本研究旨在通过生态学瞬间评估(EMA)来调查 SPD 患者日常生活中的抠皮行为。第一个目的是描述抠皮的模式(如发作和冲动的特征、强度和分布),第二个目的是探索自动抠皮和集中抠皮在特征和模式上的差异:参与者通过网络招募,并在参加 EMA 方案之前进行了网络筛查、诊断性电话访谈和综合在线自我报告问卷调查。后者包括连续 10 天,每天在上午 8 点到晚上 10 点之间进行 7 次伪随机、与时间相关的评估。EMA 问卷评估了当前的抠皮冲动、行为发生情况以及对发作特征(如时长、强度和意识)的详细评估(如适用):最终样本包括 57 名参与者,他们至少完成了 70% 的预定评估(人数=54,94.7% 为女性:平均年龄 29.3 岁,标准差 6.77 岁)。他们完成了 3758 次 EMA,报告了 1467 次抠皮事件。抠皮的发生频率较高(平均每天和每人2.57次,SD为1.12次),发作时间相对较短(10-30分钟;10分钟:抠皮次数=642,占43.8%;20分钟:抠皮次数=312,占21.3%;30分钟:抠皮次数=217,占14.8%),在一天中和一周中的不同日子里分布相当均匀。在所有报告的发作中,集中发作和自动发作相对均衡(集中发作:Nepisodes=806,54.9%),在一天中也是如此。分析表明,不同类型的自我报告触发因素之间存在显著的统计学差异。视觉或触觉线索以及抠皮肤的欲望对注意力集中型更重要(视觉或触觉线索:平均注意力集中型 [Mf]=4.01, SD 0.69 vs 平均自动型 [Ma]=3.47, SD 0.99;Pf=2.61, SD 1.06 vs Ma=1.94, SD 1.03;Pf=1.69, SD 0.89 vs Ma=1.84, SD 0.89;P=.03;SMD=-0.31;注意力不集中:Mf=2.06,SD 0.87 vs Ma=2.31,SD 1.06;P=.006;SMD=-0.41):这些结果有助于通过更严格的评估方法加深对挑食症现象的理解。我们的研究结果表明,采摘会在患者的日常生活中多次对其产生影响:试验注册:德国临床试验注册中心 DRKS00025168;https://tinyurl.com/mr35pdwh。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信