Effectiveness of e-learning material on essential components of evidence-based medicine among laypersons: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Satoe Okabayashi, Kyoko Kitazawa, Hisashi Noma, Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Taku Iwami, Takashi Kawamura, Takeo Nakayama
{"title":"Effectiveness of e-learning material on essential components of evidence-based medicine among laypersons: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Satoe Okabayashi, Kyoko Kitazawa, Hisashi Noma, Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Taku Iwami, Takashi Kawamura, Takeo Nakayama","doi":"10.1093/her/cyae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is helpful for laypersons' decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of e-learning materials on the essential components of EBM for laypersons. We conducted a web-based, open-label, randomized controlled trial with laypersons in Japan aged ≥20 years who used the internet. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group with the e-learning material and the control group with only the 'Introduction' section of the same material. The primary and secondary outcomes were the self-created acquirement test scores (responding correctly with confidence) immediately after using the material and after 4 weeks. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted. Of the 122 participants, 62 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 59 to the control group; finally, 59 and 58, respectively, were included in the full analysis set. The mean (standard deviation) of the acquirement test score immediately after learning was 14.11 and (3.11) and 11.07 (3.88) in the intervention and control groups, respectively, indicating statistical significance (multivariable P < 0.001). The secondary long-term outcome was also statistically significant. The results showed that the e-learning material was effective for laypersons in acquiring the essential components of EBM. The material may increase laypersons' confidence in appraising health information, which can be used in decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":" ","pages":"466-474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyae024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is helpful for laypersons' decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of e-learning materials on the essential components of EBM for laypersons. We conducted a web-based, open-label, randomized controlled trial with laypersons in Japan aged ≥20 years who used the internet. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group with the e-learning material and the control group with only the 'Introduction' section of the same material. The primary and secondary outcomes were the self-created acquirement test scores (responding correctly with confidence) immediately after using the material and after 4 weeks. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted. Of the 122 participants, 62 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 59 to the control group; finally, 59 and 58, respectively, were included in the full analysis set. The mean (standard deviation) of the acquirement test score immediately after learning was 14.11 and (3.11) and 11.07 (3.88) in the intervention and control groups, respectively, indicating statistical significance (multivariable P < 0.001). The secondary long-term outcome was also statistically significant. The results showed that the e-learning material was effective for laypersons in acquiring the essential components of EBM. The material may increase laypersons' confidence in appraising health information, which can be used in decision-making.

关于循证医学重要组成部分的电子学习材料对非专业人士的效果:随机对照试验。
循证医学(EBM)有助于非专业人士做出决策。本研究旨在评估有关 EBM 基本内容的电子学习材料对非专业人士的有效性。我们在日本对年龄≥20 岁、使用互联网的非专业人士进行了一项基于网络、开放标签、随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到使用电子学习材料的干预组和仅使用相同材料的 "介绍 "部分的对照组。主要和次要结果是使用教材后立即和 4 周后的自编习得测试得分(有信心正确回答问题)。研究人员进行了多元线性回归分析。在 122 名参与者中,62 人被随机分配到干预组,59 人被分配到对照组;最后,分别有 59 人和 58 人被纳入完整的分析集。干预组和对照组在学习后立即进行的习得测试得分的平均值(标准偏差)分别为 14.11 和(3.11)以及 11.07(3.88),这表明统计学意义(多变量 P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信