Exploring uterine contractility frequency in infertile population: A comparative study among different control groups with and without a C-section defect.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Juan Carlos Castillo, Maria Martínez-Moya, Ana Fuentes, Belen Moliner, María Gonzalez, Andrea Bernabeu, Rafael Bernabeu
{"title":"Exploring uterine contractility frequency in infertile population: A comparative study among different control groups with and without a C-section defect.","authors":"Juan Carlos Castillo, Maria Martínez-Moya, Ana Fuentes, Belen Moliner, María Gonzalez, Andrea Bernabeu, Rafael Bernabeu","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Women undergoing IVF who have had a previous c-section (CS) have a lower live birth rate than those with a previous vaginal delivery. However, the precise underlying mechanisms need clarification. Does a previous CS affect the pattern of uterine contractility?.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective evaluation in patients undergoing frozen blastocyst embryo transfer in medicated endometrial preparation cycles. Twenty patients were included in groups: A/nulliparous. B/previous vaginal delivery. C/ previous CS without a niche, whereas fifteen patients were recruited in group D (CS and a niche). Patients employed estradiol compounds and 800 mg vaginal progesterone. A 3D-scan was performed the transfer-day where uterine contractility/minute was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, endometrial thickness) were similar. Mean frequency of uterine contractions/minute was similar between groups (1.15, 1.01, 0.92, and 1.21 for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). There was a slight increase in the number of contractions in patients with a sonographic niche versus controls, not reaching statistical significance (p=0.48). No differences were observed when comparing patients with a previous C-section (regardless of the presence of a niche) to those without a C-section, either nulliparous (p=0.78) or with a previous vaginal delivery (p=0.80). The frequency of uterine contractions was similar between patients who achieved a clinical pregnancy and those who did not (1.19 vs. 1.02 UC/min, p=0.219, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found no significant difference in the frequency of uterine contractility between patients with or without a previous C-section or sonographic diagnosed niche. Further investigation is necessary to understand the physiological mechanisms affecting implantation in patients with isthmocele.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Women undergoing IVF who have had a previous c-section (CS) have a lower live birth rate than those with a previous vaginal delivery. However, the precise underlying mechanisms need clarification. Does a previous CS affect the pattern of uterine contractility?.

Methods: Prospective evaluation in patients undergoing frozen blastocyst embryo transfer in medicated endometrial preparation cycles. Twenty patients were included in groups: A/nulliparous. B/previous vaginal delivery. C/ previous CS without a niche, whereas fifteen patients were recruited in group D (CS and a niche). Patients employed estradiol compounds and 800 mg vaginal progesterone. A 3D-scan was performed the transfer-day where uterine contractility/minute was recorded.

Results: Baseline characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, endometrial thickness) were similar. Mean frequency of uterine contractions/minute was similar between groups (1.15, 1.01, 0.92, and 1.21 for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). There was a slight increase in the number of contractions in patients with a sonographic niche versus controls, not reaching statistical significance (p=0.48). No differences were observed when comparing patients with a previous C-section (regardless of the presence of a niche) to those without a C-section, either nulliparous (p=0.78) or with a previous vaginal delivery (p=0.80). The frequency of uterine contractions was similar between patients who achieved a clinical pregnancy and those who did not (1.19 vs. 1.02 UC/min, p=0.219, respectively).

Conclusions: Our study found no significant difference in the frequency of uterine contractility between patients with or without a previous C-section or sonographic diagnosed niche. Further investigation is necessary to understand the physiological mechanisms affecting implantation in patients with isthmocele.

探索不孕人群的子宫收缩频率:有剖腹产缺陷和无剖腹产缺陷的不同对照组之间的比较研究。
目的曾进行过剖腹产(CS)的试管婴儿妇女的活产率低于曾进行过阴道分娩的妇女。然而,其确切的内在机制尚需澄清。剖腹产是否会影响子宫收缩的模式?方法:对在药物子宫内膜准备周期中进行冷冻囊胚移植的患者进行前瞻性评估。20 名患者被分为以下几组:A/无子宫。B/阴道分娩。C/曾进行过无子宫内膜龛的 CS,而 D 组(CS 和子宫内膜龛)招募了 15 名患者。患者使用雌二醇化合物和 800 毫克阴道黄体酮。转运当天进行三维扫描,记录子宫收缩率/分钟:结果:基线特征(年龄、体重指数、吸烟、子宫内膜厚度)相似。各组的平均子宫收缩频率/分钟相似(A、B、C 和 D 组分别为 1.15、1.01、0.92 和 1.21)。与对照组相比,声像图龛位患者的宫缩次数略有增加,但未达到统计学意义(P=0.48)。曾进行过剖腹产的患者(无论是否存在子宫龛)与未进行过剖腹产的患者相比,无论是无痛分娩(P=0.78)还是阴道分娩(P=0.80),均未观察到差异。获得临床妊娠和未获得临床妊娠的患者的子宫收缩频率相似(分别为 1.19 UC/min 和 1.02 UC/min,P=0.219):我们的研究发现,既往有无剖腹产史或超声诊断为龛影的患者在子宫收缩频率上没有明显差异。要了解影响峡部畸形患者着床的生理机制,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信