Interplay of Muscle Architecture, Morphology, and Quality in Influencing Human Sprint Cycling Performance: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Saul Martin-Rodriguez, Juan J Gonzalez-Henriquez, Iker J Bautista, Jose A L Calbet, Joaquin Sanchis-Moysi
{"title":"Interplay of Muscle Architecture, Morphology, and Quality in Influencing Human Sprint Cycling Performance: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Saul Martin-Rodriguez, Juan J Gonzalez-Henriquez, Iker J Bautista, Jose A L Calbet, Joaquin Sanchis-Moysi","doi":"10.1186/s40798-024-00752-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aimed to discern the relationships between muscle morphology, architecture, and quality with sprint cycling performance while considering the multifaceted nature of these relationships across diverse studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing the PRISMA guidelines, an exhaustive search was performed across four primary databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and SPORTDiscus. The Methodological Index For Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Out of 3971 initially identified records, only 10 studies met the eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These investigations underscored the robust relationship of quadriceps muscle volume with peak power output (R<sup>2</sup> from 0.65 to 0.82), suggesting its pivotal role in force production. In muscle architecture, the pennation angle and fascicle length showed varied associations with performance. Furthermore, muscle quality, as denoted by echo intensity, showed preliminary evidence of a potential inverse relationship with performance. The methodological quality assessment revealed varied scores, with the most consistent reporting on the aim, endpoints, and inclusion of consecutive patients. However, limitations were observed in the prospective calculation of study size and unbiased assessment of study endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that muscle volume is a major determinant of sprint cycling performance. Muscle architecture and quality also impact performance, although in a more intricate way. The review calls for standardised methodologies in future research for a more comprehensive understanding and comparability of results.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023432824 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=432824 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"81"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00752-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to discern the relationships between muscle morphology, architecture, and quality with sprint cycling performance while considering the multifaceted nature of these relationships across diverse studies.

Methods: Employing the PRISMA guidelines, an exhaustive search was performed across four primary databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and SPORTDiscus. The Methodological Index For Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Out of 3971 initially identified records, only 10 studies met the eligibility criteria.

Results: These investigations underscored the robust relationship of quadriceps muscle volume with peak power output (R2 from 0.65 to 0.82), suggesting its pivotal role in force production. In muscle architecture, the pennation angle and fascicle length showed varied associations with performance. Furthermore, muscle quality, as denoted by echo intensity, showed preliminary evidence of a potential inverse relationship with performance. The methodological quality assessment revealed varied scores, with the most consistent reporting on the aim, endpoints, and inclusion of consecutive patients. However, limitations were observed in the prospective calculation of study size and unbiased assessment of study endpoints.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that muscle volume is a major determinant of sprint cycling performance. Muscle architecture and quality also impact performance, although in a more intricate way. The review calls for standardised methodologies in future research for a more comprehensive understanding and comparability of results.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023432824 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=432824 ).

肌肉结构、形态和质量在影响人类短跑自行车成绩方面的相互作用:系统回顾
背景:本系统性综述旨在探讨肌肉形态、结构和质量与短跑自行车成绩之间的关系,同时考虑到这些关系在不同研究中的多面性:采用 PRISMA 准则,在四个主要数据库中进行了详尽的检索:MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL Complete 和 SPORTDiscus。非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)用于评估纳入研究的方法学质量。在初步确定的 3971 条记录中,只有 10 项研究符合资格标准:这些研究强调了股四头肌体积与峰值力量输出之间的密切关系(R2 从 0.65 到 0.82),表明其在力量产生中的关键作用。在肌肉结构方面,五点角和筋膜长度与运动表现的关系各不相同。此外,以回声强度表示的肌肉质量也显示出与成绩可能存在反向关系的初步证据。方法质量评估显示了不同的得分,其中关于目的、终点和纳入连续患者的报告最为一致。然而,在前瞻性计算研究规模和无偏见评估研究终点方面也发现了局限性:我们的研究结果表明,肌肉体积是决定自行车短跑成绩的主要因素。肌肉结构和质量也会影响成绩,但影响方式更为复杂。本综述呼吁在未来的研究中采用标准化方法,以便更全面地了解和比较研究结果:CRD42023432824 ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=432824 ).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信