Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Angelo Territo, Mario Belmonte, Andrea Cocci, Eduard Ruiz-Castañe, Fabio Castiglione, Guglielmo Mantica, Thomas Prudhomme, Alessio Pecoraro, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Muhammet Irfan Dönmez, Francesco Esperto, Giorgio Ivan Russo, Riccardo Campi, Alberto Breda, Alicia López-Abad
{"title":"Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review.","authors":"Angelo Territo, Mario Belmonte, Andrea Cocci, Eduard Ruiz-Castañe, Fabio Castiglione, Guglielmo Mantica, Thomas Prudhomme, Alessio Pecoraro, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Muhammet Irfan Dönmez, Francesco Esperto, Giorgio Ivan Russo, Riccardo Campi, Alberto Breda, Alicia López-Abad","doi":"10.1038/s41443-024-00939-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit an elevated incidence of erectile dysfunction, attributed to comorbidities and specific factors associated with organ failure. While treatment mirrors the general population's, response rates are lower, and there is a heightened concern about implanting a penile prosthesis in immunocompromised patients due to the potential occurrence of severe complications. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of penile prostheses in this population. Among fourteen included studies, ten were case reports or series of cases, and four were non randomized case-control studies with non-transplanted patients as controls. Complications affected 34 patients (11.15%), with mechanical device failures in 18 cases (5.9%) and infections in 13 cases (4.26%). Most infections required hospitalization, antibiotic treatment, and prosthesis removal, with two cases of life-threatening Fournier's gangrene. Case-control studies revealed no differences in overall reoperation rates between transplant recipients and controls. However, pelvic organ transplant recipients undergoing three-piece prosthesis implantation showed higher complications rates related to reservoir issues. Despite limited evidence, case-control studies demonstrated a generally low/moderate risk of bias within each specific domain, although overall bias was moderate/severe. As a result, clinicians may mitigate concerns regarding penile prosthesis implantation in solid organ transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00939-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit an elevated incidence of erectile dysfunction, attributed to comorbidities and specific factors associated with organ failure. While treatment mirrors the general population's, response rates are lower, and there is a heightened concern about implanting a penile prosthesis in immunocompromised patients due to the potential occurrence of severe complications. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of penile prostheses in this population. Among fourteen included studies, ten were case reports or series of cases, and four were non randomized case-control studies with non-transplanted patients as controls. Complications affected 34 patients (11.15%), with mechanical device failures in 18 cases (5.9%) and infections in 13 cases (4.26%). Most infections required hospitalization, antibiotic treatment, and prosthesis removal, with two cases of life-threatening Fournier's gangrene. Case-control studies revealed no differences in overall reoperation rates between transplant recipients and controls. However, pelvic organ transplant recipients undergoing three-piece prosthesis implantation showed higher complications rates related to reservoir issues. Despite limited evidence, case-control studies demonstrated a generally low/moderate risk of bias within each specific domain, although overall bias was moderate/severe. As a result, clinicians may mitigate concerns regarding penile prosthesis implantation in solid organ transplant recipients.

Abstract Image

为实体器官移植受者植入阴茎假体是否安全?系统综述。
由于合并症和与器官衰竭相关的特殊因素,实体器官移植受者的勃起功能障碍发生率较高。虽然治疗方法与普通人群相同,但反应率较低,而且由于可能发生严重并发症,人们对在免疫功能低下的患者中植入阴茎假体更加担忧。本研究旨在评估阴茎假体在这类人群中的安全性。在纳入的 14 项研究中,10 项为病例报告或系列病例,4 项为非随机病例对照研究,以未接受移植手术的患者为对照。并发症影响了 34 名患者(11.15%),其中机械装置故障 18 例(5.9%),感染 13 例(4.26%)。大多数感染需要住院、抗生素治疗和假体移除,其中有两例福尼尔坏疽危及生命。病例对照研究显示,移植受者与对照组的总体再手术率没有差异。不过,接受三件式假体植入术的盆腔器官移植受者因储藏问题而出现并发症的比例较高。尽管证据有限,但病例对照研究显示每个特定领域的偏倚风险普遍较低/中等,但总体偏倚风险为中等/严重。因此,临床医生可以减轻对实体器官移植受者阴茎假体植入的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信