Anass Kherrab, Hamza Toufik, Mirieme Ghazi, Mohamed Amine Benhima, Anass Chbihi-Kaddouri, Ilyass Chergaoui, Radouane Niamane, Abdellah El Maghraoui
{"title":"Prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Morocco: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Anass Kherrab, Hamza Toufik, Mirieme Ghazi, Mohamed Amine Benhima, Anass Chbihi-Kaddouri, Ilyass Chergaoui, Radouane Niamane, Abdellah El Maghraoui","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01421-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as part of the update of Moroccan recommendations for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Its aim was to estimate the prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Morocco, based on available bibliographic data.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic search of the Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases to identify articles published between January 2000 and January 2024. We included all observational studies reporting the prevalence of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in Morocco. Two reviewers independently contributed to the study selection and data extraction. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata with the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> test statistic. Meta-regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of the date on the prevalence. Publication bias was assessed by DOI plots and the LFK index.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>An electronic search found a total of 161 citations from the databases. After excluding the irrelevant articles, 17 eligible studies were included. This meta-analysis included 5097 postmenopausal women. The pooled prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis was 32% (95% CI 28–36). Heterogeneity was statistically significant (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 89.67%). There was no significant difference between subgroup analyses performed by risk of bias and sample size. The prevalence rate was significantly higher in 2006–2012 (36%; 95% CI 31–42; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 88.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) than in 2013–2019 (27%; 95% CI 22–32; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 85.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Meta-regression showed that the prevalence of osteoporosis decreases very slightly (0.016% per year). This decrease becomes nonsignificant if only studies with a low risk of bias are included in the meta-regression (coefficient − 7.77, <i>p</i> = 0.667, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> 0%). No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results indicate that postmenopausal osteoporosis is prevalent in Morocco, which is a developing country; however, the prevalence of this disease is aligned with that of industrialized countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11657-024-01421-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as part of the update of Moroccan recommendations for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Its aim was to estimate the prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Morocco, based on available bibliographic data.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search of the Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases to identify articles published between January 2000 and January 2024. We included all observational studies reporting the prevalence of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in Morocco. Two reviewers independently contributed to the study selection and data extraction. We assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata with the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test statistic. Meta-regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of the date on the prevalence. Publication bias was assessed by DOI plots and the LFK index.
Results
An electronic search found a total of 161 citations from the databases. After excluding the irrelevant articles, 17 eligible studies were included. This meta-analysis included 5097 postmenopausal women. The pooled prevalence of postmenopausal osteoporosis was 32% (95% CI 28–36). Heterogeneity was statistically significant (I2 = 89.67%). There was no significant difference between subgroup analyses performed by risk of bias and sample size. The prevalence rate was significantly higher in 2006–2012 (36%; 95% CI 31–42; I2 = 88.7%; p < 0.001) than in 2013–2019 (27%; 95% CI 22–32; I2 = 85.9%; p < 0.001). Meta-regression showed that the prevalence of osteoporosis decreases very slightly (0.016% per year). This decrease becomes nonsignificant if only studies with a low risk of bias are included in the meta-regression (coefficient − 7.77, p = 0.667, I2 0%). No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that postmenopausal osteoporosis is prevalent in Morocco, which is a developing country; however, the prevalence of this disease is aligned with that of industrialized countries.