Cross-boundary effects of human impacts on animal assemblages in the coastal zone

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jasmine A. Ballantyne, Christopher J. Henderson, Andrew D. Olds, Thomas A. Schlacher, Brittany B. Elliott, Ben L. Gilby
{"title":"Cross-boundary effects of human impacts on animal assemblages in the coastal zone","authors":"Jasmine A. Ballantyne, Christopher J. Henderson, Andrew D. Olds, Thomas A. Schlacher, Brittany B. Elliott, Ben L. Gilby","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02901-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human impacts on ecosystems often transcend ecosystem boundaries and environmental realms, complicating ecosystem assessment, conservation, and management. Whether and how different impacts affect ecosystems in distinct but adjacent domains remains untested in many settings, and is rarely tested concurrently at the same spatial scales. In this study, we quantified the effects of coastal urbanisation on the structure of terrestrial coastal vertebrate assemblages (including birds, reptiles and mammals using baited trail cameras) and marine surf zone fish assemblages (using baited underwater videography) at 100 sites along 50 km of beach in eastern Australia. Sites occurred along a gradient of intensities of urban land conversion in the hind dunes. While the effects of urbanisation on the species sampled were pervasive across both ecosystems, the area of urbanised land mattered more for the coastal vertebrates observed, while proximity to urbanised land was more important for the surf zone fish observed. Here, fewer individuals and species of coastal vertebrates were found at sites with a greater extent of urbanised land within 5 km. Conversely, fish assemblages were more diverse in the surf zones abutting urban areas and more abundant at sites approximately 150 m from urbanised land. The spatial properties of these landscapes, including proximity to headlands for coastal vertebrates and reefs for fish, modified the effects of urbanisation. Our findings suggest that urbanisation can have ecologically nuanced effects that are detectable across the land-sea boundary, and stress the importance of landscape context when assessing and conserving animal assemblages in and around coastal cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02901-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human impacts on ecosystems often transcend ecosystem boundaries and environmental realms, complicating ecosystem assessment, conservation, and management. Whether and how different impacts affect ecosystems in distinct but adjacent domains remains untested in many settings, and is rarely tested concurrently at the same spatial scales. In this study, we quantified the effects of coastal urbanisation on the structure of terrestrial coastal vertebrate assemblages (including birds, reptiles and mammals using baited trail cameras) and marine surf zone fish assemblages (using baited underwater videography) at 100 sites along 50 km of beach in eastern Australia. Sites occurred along a gradient of intensities of urban land conversion in the hind dunes. While the effects of urbanisation on the species sampled were pervasive across both ecosystems, the area of urbanised land mattered more for the coastal vertebrates observed, while proximity to urbanised land was more important for the surf zone fish observed. Here, fewer individuals and species of coastal vertebrates were found at sites with a greater extent of urbanised land within 5 km. Conversely, fish assemblages were more diverse in the surf zones abutting urban areas and more abundant at sites approximately 150 m from urbanised land. The spatial properties of these landscapes, including proximity to headlands for coastal vertebrates and reefs for fish, modified the effects of urbanisation. Our findings suggest that urbanisation can have ecologically nuanced effects that are detectable across the land-sea boundary, and stress the importance of landscape context when assessing and conserving animal assemblages in and around coastal cities.

Abstract Image

人类影响对沿海地区动物群落的跨境效应
人类对生态系统的影响往往超越生态系统边界和环境领域,使生态系统评估、保护和管理变得更加复杂。不同的影响是否以及如何影响不同但相邻领域的生态系统,在许多情况下仍未得到验证,而且很少在相同的空间尺度上同时进行验证。在这项研究中,我们在澳大利亚东部 50 公里海滩沿线的 100 个地点,量化了沿海城市化对陆地沿海脊椎动物群(包括鸟类、爬行动物和哺乳动物,使用带饵追踪摄像机)和海洋冲浪区鱼类群(使用带饵水下摄像)结构的影响。这些地点沿着后沙丘城市土地改造强度的梯度分布。虽然城市化对取样物种的影响在两个生态系统中都很普遍,但城市化土地的面积对观察到的沿海脊椎动物更为重要,而对观察到的冲浪区鱼类来说,靠近城市化土地的程度更为重要。在 5 公里范围内城市化程度较高的地点,发现的沿海脊椎动物个体和物种较少。相反,在毗邻城市地区的冲浪区,鱼类的种类更多,在距离城市化土地约 150 米的地点,鱼类更丰富。这些景观的空间特性,包括对沿海脊椎动物来说靠近岬角,对鱼类来说靠近礁石,改变了城市化的影响。我们的研究结果表明,城市化会对生态产生微妙的影响,这种影响在海陆边界都能被发现,并强调了在评估和保护沿海城市及其周边的动物群落时景观背景的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信