Is the future of work hybrid? Examining motivations and expectations related to working from home in knowledge workers' lived experiences

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Maggie Boyraz, Rosemarie Gilbert
{"title":"Is the future of work hybrid? Examining motivations and expectations related to working from home in knowledge workers' lived experiences","authors":"Maggie Boyraz, Rosemarie Gilbert","doi":"10.1108/er-09-2023-0478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study explores the topic of remote work and the changing motivations to working from home after the COVID-19 pandemic-induced exposure to working from home. It examines the effects of that forced work from home (WFH) experience on subsequent motivations for continuing part or all of that changed mode of working. In this study, the authors examine the perspective of front-line knowledge workers regarding the motivation to WFH based on their lived experiences.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Self-determination theory (SDT) provided the theoretical basis for the study (Ryan and Deci, 2000, 2017). The authors employed semi-structured individual and group interviews (with 28 participants) and explored the following questions: How has the competence aspect of motivation to WFH changed due to the shift that occurred during the pandemic? How has the relatedness aspect of motivation to WFH changed due to the shift that occurred during the pandemic? How has the autonomy aspect of motivation to WFH changed due to the shift that transpired during the pandemic?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings show that there was a change from an extrinsic motivation based on external factors to one that is more intrinsic, or internal, in nature for knowledge workers who experienced the switch to working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study makes an important contribution by developing a theoretical model based on SDT (Ryan and Deci, 2000, 2017) in the context of WFH. In the first phase (Phase 1), workers experienced many transitional challenges due to the suddenness and intensiveness of the shift. However, over time workers adapted and adjusted (we refer to this as Phase 2 in our model). Ultimately, all three aspects of SDT – competence, relatedness and autonomy – increased motivation to work from home. However, we also found some factors that act as demotivators to knowledge workers for embracing remote work such as those involving career advancement and the expectation of voice. Despite these moderating factors, the overall progression toward the desire to WFH, at least on a hybrid basis, has continued after adjusting to the forced experience of telecommuting during the pandemic.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The contribution of this study is to disaggregate the short-term effects of the sudden transition, to the longer-term effects after adaption and adjustment occurred, and to connect that to a new perspective on work by employees. It does this by extending SDT to the context of motivation regarding work from home. The COVID-19 pandemic provided experience of and opportunities for telework to more employees and changed many of their expectations and motivations. By looking at front-line knowledge workers’ expectations and motivations related to home-based work, we can better understand the increased demand by workers for hybrid work schedules.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47857,"journal":{"name":"Employee Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/er-09-2023-0478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study explores the topic of remote work and the changing motivations to working from home after the COVID-19 pandemic-induced exposure to working from home. It examines the effects of that forced work from home (WFH) experience on subsequent motivations for continuing part or all of that changed mode of working. In this study, the authors examine the perspective of front-line knowledge workers regarding the motivation to WFH based on their lived experiences.

Design/methodology/approach

Self-determination theory (SDT) provided the theoretical basis for the study (Ryan and Deci, 2000, 2017). The authors employed semi-structured individual and group interviews (with 28 participants) and explored the following questions: How has the competence aspect of motivation to WFH changed due to the shift that occurred during the pandemic? How has the relatedness aspect of motivation to WFH changed due to the shift that occurred during the pandemic? How has the autonomy aspect of motivation to WFH changed due to the shift that transpired during the pandemic?

Findings

The findings show that there was a change from an extrinsic motivation based on external factors to one that is more intrinsic, or internal, in nature for knowledge workers who experienced the switch to working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study makes an important contribution by developing a theoretical model based on SDT (Ryan and Deci, 2000, 2017) in the context of WFH. In the first phase (Phase 1), workers experienced many transitional challenges due to the suddenness and intensiveness of the shift. However, over time workers adapted and adjusted (we refer to this as Phase 2 in our model). Ultimately, all three aspects of SDT – competence, relatedness and autonomy – increased motivation to work from home. However, we also found some factors that act as demotivators to knowledge workers for embracing remote work such as those involving career advancement and the expectation of voice. Despite these moderating factors, the overall progression toward the desire to WFH, at least on a hybrid basis, has continued after adjusting to the forced experience of telecommuting during the pandemic.

Originality/value

The contribution of this study is to disaggregate the short-term effects of the sudden transition, to the longer-term effects after adaption and adjustment occurred, and to connect that to a new perspective on work by employees. It does this by extending SDT to the context of motivation regarding work from home. The COVID-19 pandemic provided experience of and opportunities for telework to more employees and changed many of their expectations and motivations. By looking at front-line knowledge workers’ expectations and motivations related to home-based work, we can better understand the increased demand by workers for hybrid work schedules.

未来的工作是混合型的吗?从知识工作者的亲身经历看在家工作的动机和期望
目的 本研究探讨了远程工作这一主题,以及 COVID-19 大流行导致在家工作后在家工作动机的变化。它探讨了被迫在家工作(WFH)的经历对后来继续部分或全部改变工作模式的动机的影响。在本研究中,作者根据一线知识工作者的亲身经历,考察了他们对在家工作动机的看法。设计/方法/途径自我决定理论(SDT)为本研究提供了理论基础(Ryan 和 Deci,2000 年,2017 年)。作者采用了半结构化的个人和小组访谈(28 位参与者),探讨了以下问题:由于大流行病期间发生的转变,全职工作动机的能力方面发生了怎样的变化?大流行病期间发生的转变对全职工作动机的相关性方面有何影响?研究结果研究结果表明,对于在 COVID-19 大流行期间经历了在家工作转变的知识工作者来说,他们的工作动机从基于外部因素的外在动机转变为更具内在性或内部性的动机。本研究在全职在家的背景下建立了一个基于 SDT(Ryan 和 Deci,2000 年,2017 年)的理论模型,从而做出了重要贡献。在第一阶段(Phase 1),由于轮班的突然性和强度,工人们经历了许多过渡性挑战。然而,随着时间的推移,工人们逐渐适应并调整了过来(我们将此称为模型中的第二阶段)。最终,SDT 的所有三个方面--能力、相关性和自主性--都提高了在家工作的积极性。不过,我们也发现了一些阻碍知识工作者接受远程工作的因素,如涉及职业发展和对发言权的期望。尽管存在这些调节因素,但在适应了大流行病期间被迫进行远程办公的经历后,知识型员工对全职在家(至少是混合型全职在家)的渴望总体上仍在继续。 原创性/价值 本研究的贡献在于将突然转变的短期影响与适应和调整后的长期影响进行了分解,并将其与员工对工作的新看法联系起来。为此,本研究将 SDT 扩展到在家工作的动机方面。COVID-19 大流行为更多员工提供了远程工作的经验和机会,并改变了他们的许多期望和动机。通过研究一线知识型员工对在家工作的期望和动机,我们可以更好地理解员工对混合工作时间安排的更多需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Employee Relations
Employee Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.80%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: ■Communication, participation and involvement ■Developments in collective bargaining ■Equal opportunities ■Health and safety ■HRM ■Industrial relations and employment protection law ■Industrial relations management and reform ■Organizational change and people ■Personnel and recruitment ■Quality of working life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信