Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors’ Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
R. S. M. Thambithurai, Lotte van Dammen, M. V. van Baar, H. Wanders, A. Weel-Koenders, T. Haanstra, C. V. van Schie, P. V. van Zuijlen, C. H. van der Vlies, E. Bosma, C. A. Lansdorp, I. Spronk, N. V. Van Loey
{"title":"Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors’ Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects","authors":"R. S. M. Thambithurai, Lotte van Dammen, M. V. van Baar, H. Wanders, A. Weel-Koenders, T. Haanstra, C. V. van Schie, P. V. van Zuijlen, C. H. van der Vlies, E. Bosma, C. A. Lansdorp, I. Spronk, N. V. Van Loey","doi":"10.3390/ebj5030021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Burn care quality indicators are used to monitor and improve quality of care and for benchmark purposes. The perspectives of burn survivors, however, are not included in current sets of quality indicators while patient-centred care gains importance. The aim of this study was to explore burn survivors’ perspectives on quality aspects of burn care, which was used to translate their perspectives into patient-centred quality of care indicators. Qualitative descriptive research was conducted in a patient panel group. First, thematic analysis was applied to the focus groups to identify overarching themes. Second, patient-centred quality indicators, informed by burn survivors’ valued aspects of care, were defined. Ten burn survivors with an average age of 54 years (SD = 11; range 38–72 years) and mean TBSA burned of 14% (SD = 11%; range 5–35%) participated in two focus groups. Four overarching themes were identified, pointing to the importance of (1) information tailored to the different phases of recovery, (2) significant others’ wellbeing and involvement, (3) a therapeutic relationship and low-threshold access to healthcare professionals and (4) to participate in decision-making. Eighteen patient-centred process quality of care indicators within nine aspects of care were formulated. The overarching themes are reflected in patient-centred quality indicators, which present a broadened and complementary view of existing clinical quality indicators for burn care. Evaluating these patient-centred quality indicators may increase quality of care and refine patient-centred care.","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj5030021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn care quality indicators are used to monitor and improve quality of care and for benchmark purposes. The perspectives of burn survivors, however, are not included in current sets of quality indicators while patient-centred care gains importance. The aim of this study was to explore burn survivors’ perspectives on quality aspects of burn care, which was used to translate their perspectives into patient-centred quality of care indicators. Qualitative descriptive research was conducted in a patient panel group. First, thematic analysis was applied to the focus groups to identify overarching themes. Second, patient-centred quality indicators, informed by burn survivors’ valued aspects of care, were defined. Ten burn survivors with an average age of 54 years (SD = 11; range 38–72 years) and mean TBSA burned of 14% (SD = 11%; range 5–35%) participated in two focus groups. Four overarching themes were identified, pointing to the importance of (1) information tailored to the different phases of recovery, (2) significant others’ wellbeing and involvement, (3) a therapeutic relationship and low-threshold access to healthcare professionals and (4) to participate in decision-making. Eighteen patient-centred process quality of care indicators within nine aspects of care were formulated. The overarching themes are reflected in patient-centred quality indicators, which present a broadened and complementary view of existing clinical quality indicators for burn care. Evaluating these patient-centred quality indicators may increase quality of care and refine patient-centred care.
定性描述研究调查烧伤幸存者对护理质量的看法
烧伤护理质量指标用于监测和提高护理质量,并用于制定基准。然而,在以患者为中心的护理越来越受到重视的同时,烧伤幸存者的观点却没有被纳入当前的质量指标中。本研究旨在探讨烧伤幸存者对烧伤护理质量方面的看法,并将他们的看法转化为以患者为中心的护理质量指标。在一个患者小组中进行了定性描述研究。首先,对焦点小组进行了主题分析,以确定总体主题。其次,根据烧伤幸存者对护理的重视程度,确定了以患者为中心的质量指标。10 名烧伤幸存者参加了两个焦点小组,他们的平均年龄为 54 岁(SD = 11;年龄范围为 38-72 岁),平均烧伤总面积为 14%(SD = 11%;年龄范围为 5-35%)。会议确定了四大主题,指出了以下方面的重要性:(1)针对不同康复阶段的信息;(2)重要他人的健康和参与;(3)治疗关系和低门槛接触医疗专业人员;(4)参与决策。在九个护理方面制定了十八个以患者为中心的护理过程质量指标。这些以患者为中心的质量指标反映了总体主题,是对现有烧伤护理临床质量指标的拓宽和补充。评估这些以患者为中心的质量指标可以提高护理质量,完善以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信