Leah K. Hamilton , Katharine A. Bradley , Theresa E. Matson , Gwen T. Lapham
{"title":"Discriminative validity of a substance use symptom checklist for moderate-severe DSM-5 cannabis use disorder (CUD) in primary care settings","authors":"Leah K. Hamilton , Katharine A. Bradley , Theresa E. Matson , Gwen T. Lapham","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) is increasing in the US and primary care providers need tools to identify patients with moderate-severe CUD to facilitate treatment. A single-item screen for cannabis (SIS-C) has outstanding discriminative validity for CUD. However, because the prevalence of moderate-severe CUD is typically low, the probability that an average patient who screens positive for daily cannabis has moderate-severe cannabis use disorder is low, making follow-up assessment important.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study reports the discriminative validity of a DSM-5 Substance Use Symptom Checklist (“Checklist”) for moderate-severe CUD among 498 primary care patients who reported daily cannabis use on the SIS-C. We evaluated the performance of the Checklist (score 0–11) completed during routine care, compared to ≥4 DSM-5 CUD symptoms (moderate-severe CUD) on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview <em>Substance Abuse Module</em> from a confidential survey (reference standard). We estimated areas under receiver operating curve (AUROC), sensitivities, specificities, and post-test probabilities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 498 eligible patients, 17 % met diagnostic criteria for moderate-severe CUD. The Checklist’s AUROC for moderate-severe CUD was 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.71–0.83), and Checklist scores of 1–2 balanced sensitivity and specificity. Among patients from a population with average prevalence of CUD before screening (~6 % prevalence) and daily use on the SIS-C, a Checklist score of 3 indicated a post-test probability of 82.1 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall performance of the Checklist was good and the high specificity made it useful for identifying patients likely to have moderate-severe CUD among those at average risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000441/pdfft?md5=468e165c6ff5e4b110eb7e7271a87843&pid=1-s2.0-S2772724624000441-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) is increasing in the US and primary care providers need tools to identify patients with moderate-severe CUD to facilitate treatment. A single-item screen for cannabis (SIS-C) has outstanding discriminative validity for CUD. However, because the prevalence of moderate-severe CUD is typically low, the probability that an average patient who screens positive for daily cannabis has moderate-severe cannabis use disorder is low, making follow-up assessment important.
Methods
This study reports the discriminative validity of a DSM-5 Substance Use Symptom Checklist (“Checklist”) for moderate-severe CUD among 498 primary care patients who reported daily cannabis use on the SIS-C. We evaluated the performance of the Checklist (score 0–11) completed during routine care, compared to ≥4 DSM-5 CUD symptoms (moderate-severe CUD) on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Substance Abuse Module from a confidential survey (reference standard). We estimated areas under receiver operating curve (AUROC), sensitivities, specificities, and post-test probabilities.
Results
Of 498 eligible patients, 17 % met diagnostic criteria for moderate-severe CUD. The Checklist’s AUROC for moderate-severe CUD was 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.71–0.83), and Checklist scores of 1–2 balanced sensitivity and specificity. Among patients from a population with average prevalence of CUD before screening (~6 % prevalence) and daily use on the SIS-C, a Checklist score of 3 indicated a post-test probability of 82.1 %.
Conclusion
Overall performance of the Checklist was good and the high specificity made it useful for identifying patients likely to have moderate-severe CUD among those at average risk.