Generation of Tailored and Confined Datasets for IDS Evaluation in Cyber-Physical Systems

IF 7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
T. Hutzelmann, Dominik Mauksch, A. Petrovska, Alexander Pretschner
{"title":"Generation of Tailored and Confined Datasets for IDS Evaluation in Cyber-Physical Systems","authors":"T. Hutzelmann, Dominik Mauksch, A. Petrovska, Alexander Pretschner","doi":"10.1109/TDSC.2023.3341211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state-of-the-art evaluation of an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) relies on benchmark datasets composed of the regular system's and potential attackers’ behavior. The datasets are collected once and independently of the IDS under analysis. This paper questions this practice by introducing a methodology to elicit particularly challenging samples to benchmark a given IDS. In detail, we propose (1) six fitness functions quantifying the suitability of individual samples, particularly tailored for safety-critical cyber-physical systems, (2) a scenario-based methodology for attacks on networks to systematically deduce optimal samples in addition to previous datasets, and (3) a respective extension of the standard IDS evaluation methodology. We applied our methodology to two network-based IDSs defending an advanced driver assistance system. Our results indicate that different IDSs show strongly differing characteristics in their edge case classifications and that the original datasets used for evaluation do not include such challenging behavior. In the worst case, this causes a critical undetected attack, as we document for one IDS. Our findings highlight the need to tailor benchmark datasets to the individual IDS in a final evaluation step. Especially the manual investigation of selected samples from edge case classifications by domain experts is vital for assessing the IDSs.","PeriodicalId":13047,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3341211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The state-of-the-art evaluation of an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) relies on benchmark datasets composed of the regular system's and potential attackers’ behavior. The datasets are collected once and independently of the IDS under analysis. This paper questions this practice by introducing a methodology to elicit particularly challenging samples to benchmark a given IDS. In detail, we propose (1) six fitness functions quantifying the suitability of individual samples, particularly tailored for safety-critical cyber-physical systems, (2) a scenario-based methodology for attacks on networks to systematically deduce optimal samples in addition to previous datasets, and (3) a respective extension of the standard IDS evaluation methodology. We applied our methodology to two network-based IDSs defending an advanced driver assistance system. Our results indicate that different IDSs show strongly differing characteristics in their edge case classifications and that the original datasets used for evaluation do not include such challenging behavior. In the worst case, this causes a critical undetected attack, as we document for one IDS. Our findings highlight the need to tailor benchmark datasets to the individual IDS in a final evaluation step. Especially the manual investigation of selected samples from edge case classifications by domain experts is vital for assessing the IDSs.
为网络物理系统中的 IDS 评估生成量身定制的限定数据集
最先进的入侵检测系统(IDS)评估依赖于由常规系统和潜在攻击者行为组成的基准数据集。这些数据集是一次性收集的,与正在分析的 IDS 无关。本文对这种做法提出了质疑,提出了一种方法来获取特别具有挑战性的样本,以对给定的 IDS 进行基准测试。具体而言,我们提出了 (1) 六种适合度函数,用于量化单个样本的适合度,尤其适合安全关键型网络物理系统;(2) 一种基于场景的网络攻击方法,用于在先前数据集的基础上系统地推导出最佳样本;(3) 标准 IDS 评估方法的相应扩展。我们将这一方法应用于两个基于网络的 IDS,以防御一个高级驾驶辅助系统。我们的结果表明,不同的 IDS 在边缘情况分类方面表现出强烈的差异特征,而用于评估的原始数据集并不包含此类挑战行为。在最坏的情况下,这会导致关键的未检测攻击,我们记录了一个 IDS 的情况。我们的研究结果突出表明,在最后的评估步骤中,有必要对基准数据集进行调整,使其适合各个 IDS。尤其是由领域专家对从边缘案例分类中选取的样本进行人工调查,对于评估 IDS 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The "IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (TDSC)" is a prestigious journal that publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research in the field of computer science, specifically targeting the development of dependable and secure computing systems and networks. This journal is dedicated to exploring the fundamental principles, methodologies, and mechanisms that enable the design, modeling, and evaluation of systems that meet the required levels of reliability, security, and performance. The scope of TDSC includes research on measurement, modeling, and simulation techniques that contribute to the understanding and improvement of system performance under various constraints. It also covers the foundations necessary for the joint evaluation, verification, and design of systems that balance performance, security, and dependability. By publishing archival research results, TDSC aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners working in the areas of cybersecurity, fault tolerance, and system reliability. The journal's focus on cutting-edge research ensures that it remains at the forefront of advancements in the field, promoting the development of technologies that are critical for the functioning of modern, complex systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信