Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii and potential tick vectors infesting domestic ruminants and community perception of the disease in pastoral areas of south Omo zone, southern Ethiopia

IF 2 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Senait Getachew , Bersissa Kumsa , Yitbarek Getachew , Getachew Kinfe , Balako Gumi , Tesfaye Rufael , Bekele Megersa
{"title":"Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii and potential tick vectors infesting domestic ruminants and community perception of the disease in pastoral areas of south Omo zone, southern Ethiopia","authors":"Senait Getachew ,&nbsp;Bersissa Kumsa ,&nbsp;Yitbarek Getachew ,&nbsp;Getachew Kinfe ,&nbsp;Balako Gumi ,&nbsp;Tesfaye Rufael ,&nbsp;Bekele Megersa","doi":"10.1016/j.parepi.2024.e00369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Q fever is a worldwide occurring neglected zoonotic disease with great economic importance. The etiological agent, <em>Coxiella burnetii,</em> is a bacterium usually associated with subclinical infections in livestock, but may also cause reproductive pathology and spontaneous abortions in artiodactyl species including goats, sheep and cattle which are deemed to be the primary reservoirs of this disease.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The present cross-sectional and questionnaire survey was undertaken in three districts of the South Omo zone with the aims to comprehend the community perception of livestock keepers and professionals about the disease, estimate the seroprevalence of <em>Coxiella burnetii</em> (<em>C. burnetii</em>) in cattle and small ruminants and to determine the species of potential tick vectors of <em>C. burnetii</em> infesting cattle, sheep and goats.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A standard questionnaire was used to assess the community perception of livestock keepers and animal health professionals in the area about Q fever. Sera samples were collected from 1350 ruminants comprising 450 cattle, 450 goats and 450 sheep to detect <em>C. burnetii</em> antibodies using the ELISA technique. Furthermore, a total of 279 cattle, 197 goats and 73 sheep were examined for the presence of ticks, and overall, 2720 ticks were collected (1299 from cattle, 1020 from goats and 401 from sheep) and identified to the species level using morphologically identification keys.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Findings of the study indicated that 43% of animal owners were aware of the main symptoms of the disease while the remaining 57% did not notice these symptoms in their animals. Additionally, majority of animal health professionals 76.2% in the area reported they were familiar with the causative agent of Q fever, while 23.8% expressed uncertainty regarding the cause of coxiellosis. An overall seroprevalence of <em>C. burnetii</em> of 37.6% in cattle (37.4% in female and 37.8% in male cattle) and 28.7% in small ruminants was recorded (which is significantly higher in goats than in sheep). The study indicated statistically significantly higher seroprevalence of <em>C. burnetii</em> (49.8%) in cattle infested with ticks than in those cattle free of ticks (24.2%), with three times higher seropositivity (OR = 2.97, <em>p</em> = 0.000) as compared to those cattle free of ticks (24.2%). Similarly, statistically significantly higher seroprevalence of <em>C. burnetii</em> was recorded in both sheep and goats infested with ticks (43.6%) as compared to those animals without ticks (22.9%), with the former being twice as likely to test seropositive (OR = 2.15, <em>p</em> = 0.000). A total of nine different tick species were identified, namely <em>Amblyomma variegatum</em> (<em>Am. variegatum</em>) with 26.3% (342; 217 males, 101 females and 24 nymphs), <em>Amblyomma cohaerens</em> (<em>Am. cohaerens</em>) with 47.96% (370 males, 253 females), <em>Amblyomma gemma</em> (<em>Am. gemma</em>) with 4.00% (52; 29 males, 23 female), <em>Rhipicephalus pulchellus</em> (<em>Rh. pulchellus</em>) with 10.6% (138; 87 males, 51 females), <em>Rhipicephalus pravus</em> (<em>Rh. pravus</em>) with 0.2% (3; 2 males, 1 females), <em>Rhipicephalus evertsi</em> (<em>Rh. evertsi</em>) with 4.7% (61; 39 males, 22 females)<em>, Rhipicephalus praetextatus</em> (<em>Rh. praetextatus</em>) with 0.8% (10; 7 males, 3 females), <em>Rhipicephalus decoloratus</em> (<em>Rh decoloratus</em>) with 2.9% (38; 4 males, 34 females) and <em>Hyalomma truncatum</em> (<em>Hy. truncatum</em>) with 2.5% (32 females).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present study highlighted the significance of Q fever in ruminants and compiled information about the community perception of livestock keepers and veterinary professionals of the study areas. The role of ruminants and their ticks in the epidemiology of <em>C. burnetii</em> requires further research using molecular tools to better understand appropriate method of intervention that will help to reduce negative impacts on the productivities of livestock and the health of humans in Ethiopia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37873,"journal":{"name":"Parasite Epidemiology and Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673124000333/pdfft?md5=8897b5bd8c2742a7e5381b0d5002b9df&pid=1-s2.0-S2405673124000333-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasite Epidemiology and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673124000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Q fever is a worldwide occurring neglected zoonotic disease with great economic importance. The etiological agent, Coxiella burnetii, is a bacterium usually associated with subclinical infections in livestock, but may also cause reproductive pathology and spontaneous abortions in artiodactyl species including goats, sheep and cattle which are deemed to be the primary reservoirs of this disease.

Aims

The present cross-sectional and questionnaire survey was undertaken in three districts of the South Omo zone with the aims to comprehend the community perception of livestock keepers and professionals about the disease, estimate the seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii (C. burnetii) in cattle and small ruminants and to determine the species of potential tick vectors of C. burnetii infesting cattle, sheep and goats.

Methods

A standard questionnaire was used to assess the community perception of livestock keepers and animal health professionals in the area about Q fever. Sera samples were collected from 1350 ruminants comprising 450 cattle, 450 goats and 450 sheep to detect C. burnetii antibodies using the ELISA technique. Furthermore, a total of 279 cattle, 197 goats and 73 sheep were examined for the presence of ticks, and overall, 2720 ticks were collected (1299 from cattle, 1020 from goats and 401 from sheep) and identified to the species level using morphologically identification keys.

Results

Findings of the study indicated that 43% of animal owners were aware of the main symptoms of the disease while the remaining 57% did not notice these symptoms in their animals. Additionally, majority of animal health professionals 76.2% in the area reported they were familiar with the causative agent of Q fever, while 23.8% expressed uncertainty regarding the cause of coxiellosis. An overall seroprevalence of C. burnetii of 37.6% in cattle (37.4% in female and 37.8% in male cattle) and 28.7% in small ruminants was recorded (which is significantly higher in goats than in sheep). The study indicated statistically significantly higher seroprevalence of C. burnetii (49.8%) in cattle infested with ticks than in those cattle free of ticks (24.2%), with three times higher seropositivity (OR = 2.97, p = 0.000) as compared to those cattle free of ticks (24.2%). Similarly, statistically significantly higher seroprevalence of C. burnetii was recorded in both sheep and goats infested with ticks (43.6%) as compared to those animals without ticks (22.9%), with the former being twice as likely to test seropositive (OR = 2.15, p = 0.000). A total of nine different tick species were identified, namely Amblyomma variegatum (Am. variegatum) with 26.3% (342; 217 males, 101 females and 24 nymphs), Amblyomma cohaerens (Am. cohaerens) with 47.96% (370 males, 253 females), Amblyomma gemma (Am. gemma) with 4.00% (52; 29 males, 23 female), Rhipicephalus pulchellus (Rh. pulchellus) with 10.6% (138; 87 males, 51 females), Rhipicephalus pravus (Rh. pravus) with 0.2% (3; 2 males, 1 females), Rhipicephalus evertsi (Rh. evertsi) with 4.7% (61; 39 males, 22 females), Rhipicephalus praetextatus (Rh. praetextatus) with 0.8% (10; 7 males, 3 females), Rhipicephalus decoloratus (Rh decoloratus) with 2.9% (38; 4 males, 34 females) and Hyalomma truncatum (Hy. truncatum) with 2.5% (32 females).

Conclusion

The present study highlighted the significance of Q fever in ruminants and compiled information about the community perception of livestock keepers and veterinary professionals of the study areas. The role of ruminants and their ticks in the epidemiology of C. burnetii requires further research using molecular tools to better understand appropriate method of intervention that will help to reduce negative impacts on the productivities of livestock and the health of humans in Ethiopia.

埃塞俄比亚南部奥莫区南部牧区家养反刍动物体内库克西氏菌和潜在蜱媒的血清流行率以及社区对该疾病的看法
背景QQ热是一种在全球范围内发生的被忽视的人畜共患病,具有重要的经济意义。病原体烧伤蜱是一种细菌,通常与家畜的亚临床感染有关,但也可能导致包括山羊、绵羊和牛在内的人工兽类的生殖系统病变和自然流产,而山羊、绵羊和牛被认为是这种疾病的主要传播者。本次横断面问卷调查在南奥莫区的三个地区进行,目的是了解社区牲畜饲养者和专业人员对该疾病的看法,估计牛和小型牲畜的烧伤克西氏菌血清阳性率。方法 采用标准问卷评估该地区社区牲畜饲养者和动物保健专业人员对 Q 热的看法。从1350头反刍动物(包括450头牛、450头山羊和450头绵羊)中采集血清样本,使用ELISA技术检测烧伤蜱抗体。此外,还检查了 279 头牛、197 只山羊和 73 只绵羊身上是否有蜱虫,共收集到 2720 只蜱虫(其中 1299 只来自牛,1020 只来自山羊,401 只来自绵羊),并使用形态识别钥匙进行了物种鉴定。此外,该地区大多数动物卫生专业人员(76.2%)表示他们熟悉Q热的病原体,而23.8%的人对柯萨奇病的病因表示不确定。据记录,牛的烧伤蜱血清阳性率为 37.6%(母牛为 37.4%,公牛为 37.8%),小反刍动物为 28.7%(山羊明显高于绵羊)。研究表明,有蜱虫的牛(49.8%)血清阳性率明显高于无蜱虫的牛(24.2%),是无蜱虫牛(24.2%)的三倍(OR = 2.97,P = 0.000)。同样,与没有蜱虫的动物(22.9%)相比,有蜱虫的绵羊和山羊(43.6%)血清阳性率明显更高(OR = 2.15,p = 0.000)。共鉴定出 9 种不同的蜱虫,分别是变种蜱(Amblyomma variegatum),占 26.3%(342 只,其中 217 只为雄性,101 只为雌性,24 只为若虫);蜗牛蜱(Amblyomma cohaerens),占 47.96%(370 只为雄性,253 只为雌性);宝石蜱(Amblyomma gemma),占 4.00%(370 只为雄性,253 只为雌性)。gema),占 4.00%(52;29 雄性,23 雌性);Rhipicephalus pulchellus(Rh. pulchellus),占 10.6%(138;87 雄性,51 雌性);Rhipicephalus pravus(Rh. pravus),占 0.2%(3;2 雄性,1 雌性);Rhipicephalus evertsi(Rh.praetextatus),占 0.8%(10 个;7 个雄性,3 个雌性);Rhipicephalus decoloratus(Rh decoloratus),占 2.9%(38 个;4 个雄性,34 个雌性);Hyalomma truncatum(Hy.本研究强调了反刍动物 Q 热的重要性,并汇编了有关研究地区家畜饲养者和兽医专业人员的社区认知信息。反刍动物及其蜱虫在烧伤蜱流行病学中的作用需要利用分子工具进行进一步研究,以便更好地了解适当的干预方法,这将有助于减少对埃塞俄比亚牲畜生产力和人类健康的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasite Epidemiology and Control
Parasite Epidemiology and Control Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasite Epidemiology and Control is an Open Access journal. There is an increasing amount of research in the parasitology area that analyses the patterns, causes, and effects of health and disease conditions in defined populations. This epidemiology of parasite infectious diseases is predominantly studied in human populations but also spans other major hosts of parasitic infections and as such this journal will have a broad remit. We will focus on the major areas of epidemiological study including disease etiology, disease surveillance, drug resistance and geographical spread and screening, biomonitoring, and comparisons of treatment effects in clinical trials for both human and other animals. We will also look at the epidemiology and control of vector insects. The journal will also cover the use of geographic information systems (Epi-GIS) for epidemiological surveillance which is a rapidly growing area of research in infectious diseases. Molecular epidemiological approaches are also particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信