Digital Financial Development, Financial Service Participation and Residents' Entrepreneurship

Shurui Wang, Dongchen Ma, Yan Yang
{"title":"Digital Financial Development, Financial Service Participation and Residents' Entrepreneurship","authors":"Shurui Wang, Dongchen Ma, Yan Yang","doi":"10.47260/amae/1465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n\nThis paper analyses the impact of different forms of financial participation on residents' entrepreneurial choices by defining different forms of lending based on CHFS 2019 data. The study finds that: (1) Both single and compound forms of participation can have a significant positive impact on residents' entrepreneurial choices, with the compound form of participation having a relatively higher boosting effect than the single form of participation; (2) Among the single forms of participation, internet loans have the smallest promotion effect, indicating that the role of digital finance is still to be explored, while private loans have the largest promotion effect; (3) Among the composite forms of participation, the form without bank loans has the lowest facilitation effect, indicating that bank loans are highly important for residents' choice of entrepreneurship; (4) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that financial services participation has a more significant contribution to entrepreneurial activity among low endowment households, both in single and composite forms of participation. This paper argues that the supporting role of formal finance should be strengthened, the development of informal finance should be reasonably guided, and the financial literacy of households should be further enhanced to bring into play the inclusive role of digital finance.\n\nJEL classification numbers: H20, H30, H81.\n\nKeywords: Digitization of financial institutions; Financial services participation; Digital finance; Internet lending; Entrepreneurial activity.","PeriodicalId":505460,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Management and Applied Economics","volume":"111 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Management and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47260/amae/1465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyses the impact of different forms of financial participation on residents' entrepreneurial choices by defining different forms of lending based on CHFS 2019 data. The study finds that: (1) Both single and compound forms of participation can have a significant positive impact on residents' entrepreneurial choices, with the compound form of participation having a relatively higher boosting effect than the single form of participation; (2) Among the single forms of participation, internet loans have the smallest promotion effect, indicating that the role of digital finance is still to be explored, while private loans have the largest promotion effect; (3) Among the composite forms of participation, the form without bank loans has the lowest facilitation effect, indicating that bank loans are highly important for residents' choice of entrepreneurship; (4) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that financial services participation has a more significant contribution to entrepreneurial activity among low endowment households, both in single and composite forms of participation. This paper argues that the supporting role of formal finance should be strengthened, the development of informal finance should be reasonably guided, and the financial literacy of households should be further enhanced to bring into play the inclusive role of digital finance. JEL classification numbers: H20, H30, H81. Keywords: Digitization of financial institutions; Financial services participation; Digital finance; Internet lending; Entrepreneurial activity.
数字金融发展、金融服务参与和居民创业
摘要 本文基于 CHFS 2019 年的数据,通过界定不同形式的贷款,分析了不同形式的金融参与对居民创业选择的影响。研究发现(1)单一参与形式和复合参与形式都能对居民的创业选择产生显著的正向影响,其中复合参与形式的促进作用相对高于单一参与形式;(2)在单一参与形式中,网络贷款的促进作用最小,说明数字金融的作用还有待挖掘,而民间借贷的促进作用最大;(3)在复合参与形式中,无银行贷款形式的促进效应最低,说明银行贷款对居民创业选择的重要性很高;(4)异质性分析表明,无论是单一参与形式还是复合参与形式,金融服务参与对低禀赋家庭创业活动的促进作用更显著。本文认为,应加强正规金融的支持作用,合理引导非正规金融的发展,进一步提高家庭的金融素养,发挥数字金融的普惠作用:H20,H30,H81.Keywords:金融机构数字化;金融服务参与;数字金融;网络借贷;创业活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信