Nutritional status, nutritional risk, nutrition impact symptoms, and nutritional treatment in inpatients with COVID-19 during the first outbreak – An observational study

Q3 Nursing
Martine Kjærsgaard Nielsen, Anne Wilkens Knudsen, Anne Mette Larsen, Pia Sonne, Helena Osbæck Jensen, Anne Marie Beck, Tina Munk
{"title":"Nutritional status, nutritional risk, nutrition impact symptoms, and nutritional treatment in inpatients with COVID-19 during the first outbreak – An observational study","authors":"Martine Kjærsgaard Nielsen,&nbsp;Anne Wilkens Knudsen,&nbsp;Anne Mette Larsen,&nbsp;Pia Sonne,&nbsp;Helena Osbæck Jensen,&nbsp;Anne Marie Beck,&nbsp;Tina Munk","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/aims</h3><p>During the first outbreak of COVID-19 knowledge regarding nutritional status and target areas of the nutritional treatment to patients admitted to the hospitals with COVID-19 was limited. Therefore, the aim was 1) to describe baseline characteristics including nutritional status, nutritional risk, energy- and protein intake, nutritional route, and Nutrition Impact Symptoms (NIS) known to have an impact on the nutritional intake; 2) to compare these characteristics in patients who, respectively, survived or died within 30 days after discharge and 3) to describe nutritional aspects in the transition between hospitalisation and a home setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an observational study. Patients admitted with COVID-19 in 2020 and referred to clinical dietitians were enrolled. Data on nutritional status, nutritional risk, NIS, nutritional treatment, grade of inflammation, 30-days mortality and readmissions rate and nutritional aspects after discharge were collected from the patient journal.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 81 patients, 41 (51%) male, median age 75 (IQR: 63–83). Patients were referred to the clinical dietitians at median day 4 (IQR: 3–8) of the hospital stay. The median BMI was 25 (IQR: 21–28) and 58 (83%) were at nutritional risk. Nutrition route was primarily oral (89%). The three most common NIS were; decreased appetite (88%), shortness of breath (55%), and early satiety (47%).</p><p>At the 30 days follow-up 23 (28%) patients were deceased, of these 16 (70%) before discharge. The patients who died were older (median 82 vs. 72 y, <em>P</em>=0.002), and more were admitted from a care facility (48 vs. 17%, <em>P</em>=0.005). Further, among those who died fewer covered their energy requirement (25 vs. 43%, <em>P</em>=0.001), and protein requirement (23 vs. 34%, <em>P</em>=0.032). Also chewing- and swallowing problems were more prevalent in those who died (45 vs. 17%, <em>P</em>=0.048). There were no differences in nutritional status, nutritional risk, or nutritional route among the two groups. A total of 21 (26%) patients were readmitted within 30 days.</p><p>At discharge only 11 (14%) patients had a nutritional discharge plan made by the clinical dietician. Up to one fifth still experienced NIS with early satiety (20%), chewing or swallowing problems (15%) and respiratory problems (15%) being the most frequent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 had several NIS, a high prevalence of nutritional risk and the majority had a nutritional intake below requirement. The mortality was high, especially during hospitalisation, and those patients that died had a lower intake of energy and protein and hence also coverage of requirement. Most patients were fed orally during hospitalisation. More than one fourth of the patients were readmitted within 30 days. Few patients had a nutritional discharge plan made by the dietitian and up till one fifth of the patients still suffered from NIS.</p><p>Therefore, nutritional treatment is relevant in this group of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"57 ","pages":"Pages 39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000615/pdfft?md5=637bb7c1e0bf564a0ca783e1cce55964&pid=1-s2.0-S2667268524000615-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268524000615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims

During the first outbreak of COVID-19 knowledge regarding nutritional status and target areas of the nutritional treatment to patients admitted to the hospitals with COVID-19 was limited. Therefore, the aim was 1) to describe baseline characteristics including nutritional status, nutritional risk, energy- and protein intake, nutritional route, and Nutrition Impact Symptoms (NIS) known to have an impact on the nutritional intake; 2) to compare these characteristics in patients who, respectively, survived or died within 30 days after discharge and 3) to describe nutritional aspects in the transition between hospitalisation and a home setting.

Methods

This was an observational study. Patients admitted with COVID-19 in 2020 and referred to clinical dietitians were enrolled. Data on nutritional status, nutritional risk, NIS, nutritional treatment, grade of inflammation, 30-days mortality and readmissions rate and nutritional aspects after discharge were collected from the patient journal.

Results

We included 81 patients, 41 (51%) male, median age 75 (IQR: 63–83). Patients were referred to the clinical dietitians at median day 4 (IQR: 3–8) of the hospital stay. The median BMI was 25 (IQR: 21–28) and 58 (83%) were at nutritional risk. Nutrition route was primarily oral (89%). The three most common NIS were; decreased appetite (88%), shortness of breath (55%), and early satiety (47%).

At the 30 days follow-up 23 (28%) patients were deceased, of these 16 (70%) before discharge. The patients who died were older (median 82 vs. 72 y, P=0.002), and more were admitted from a care facility (48 vs. 17%, P=0.005). Further, among those who died fewer covered their energy requirement (25 vs. 43%, P=0.001), and protein requirement (23 vs. 34%, P=0.032). Also chewing- and swallowing problems were more prevalent in those who died (45 vs. 17%, P=0.048). There were no differences in nutritional status, nutritional risk, or nutritional route among the two groups. A total of 21 (26%) patients were readmitted within 30 days.

At discharge only 11 (14%) patients had a nutritional discharge plan made by the clinical dietician. Up to one fifth still experienced NIS with early satiety (20%), chewing or swallowing problems (15%) and respiratory problems (15%) being the most frequent.

Conclusions

Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 had several NIS, a high prevalence of nutritional risk and the majority had a nutritional intake below requirement. The mortality was high, especially during hospitalisation, and those patients that died had a lower intake of energy and protein and hence also coverage of requirement. Most patients were fed orally during hospitalisation. More than one fourth of the patients were readmitted within 30 days. Few patients had a nutritional discharge plan made by the dietitian and up till one fifth of the patients still suffered from NIS.

Therefore, nutritional treatment is relevant in this group of patients.

第一次疫情爆发期间 COVID-19 住院患者的营养状况、营养风险、营养影响症状和营养治疗--一项观察性研究
背景/目的在 COVID-19 第一次疫情爆发期间,人们对 COVID-19 住院患者的营养状况和营养治疗目标领域的了解十分有限。因此,该研究旨在:1)描述基线特征,包括营养状况、营养风险、能量和蛋白质摄入、营养途径以及已知会影响营养摄入的营养影响症状(NIS);2)比较出院后 30 天内存活或死亡的患者的这些特征;3)描述住院和居家环境过渡期间的营养状况。研究对象为 2020 年因 COVID-19 入院并转诊至临床营养师的患者。从患者日志中收集有关营养状况、营养风险、NIS、营养治疗、炎症等级、30 天死亡率和再入院率以及出院后营养方面的数据。结果我们纳入了 81 名患者,其中 41 人(51%)为男性,中位年龄为 75 岁(IQR:63-83)。患者在住院中位数第 4 天(IQR:3-8)被转诊至临床营养师。体重指数中位数为 25(IQR:21-28),58 人(83%)有营养风险。营养途径主要是口服(89%)。在 30 天的随访中,23 名(28%)患者死亡,其中 16 名(70%)在出院前死亡。死亡患者的年龄较大(中位数为 82 岁对 72 岁,P=0.002),从护理机构入院的患者较多(48% 对 17%,P=0.005)。此外,在死亡患者中,满足能量需求(25% 对 43%,P=0.001)和蛋白质需求(23% 对 34%,P=0.032)的人数较少。此外,咀嚼和吞咽困难在死亡者中更为普遍(45% 对 17%,P=0.048)。两组患者在营养状况、营养风险或营养途径方面没有差异。共有21名(26%)患者在30天内再次入院。出院时,只有11名(14%)患者由临床营养师制定了营养出院计划。多达五分之一的患者仍有营养不良症状,其中以早饱(20%)、咀嚼或吞咽困难(15%)和呼吸困难(15%)最为常见。死亡率很高,尤其是在住院期间,死亡患者的能量和蛋白质摄入量较低,因此也达不到要求。大多数病人在住院期间都是口服喂养。超过四分之一的患者在 30 天内再次入院。营养师为极少数患者制定了营养出院计划,多达五分之一的患者仍患有 NIS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Clinical Nutrition Open Science Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信